There is no doubt that there is a close relationship between environment and success. A good environment, the so-called "prosperity", has all the conditions needed to become a talent, which is conducive to a person's progress and growth and to cultivating talents. On the contrary, the bad environment, the so-called "adversity", restricts or even stifles people's efforts in study and career everywhere, which is not conducive to a person's progress and growth, and sometimes even destroys people. Ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, such examples are endless. In order to produce more talents quickly, society and families must strive to create and provide the best possible material and cultural conditions for the growth of talents. For a person, in order to realize the hope of success, it is understandable to try to choose a better environment for himself. Nowadays, the majority of teenagers are trying their best to get into famous brands or key schools, which is beyond reproach. Everyone is striving to enter, because the environmental conditions such as equipment and teachers of such schools are better than those of similar schools.
In short, the environment is really closely related to success, and the environment is really important to success. It can be said that without the minimum environmental conditions, it is impossible to produce talents. This is a materialistic view. Failure to see this goes against materialism. However, it cannot be concluded that prosperity is bound to succeed and adversity is bound to fail (the overall conditions are not good, but there are still some favorable conditions). This understanding is also wrong, and we should also treat this issue dialectically. In fact, are there not many such people? Family provides him with superior material conditions, school provides him with a good learning environment, and society also has various opportunities to become a talent.
It can be seen that the objective environment does play an important role in success. But as far as a person is concerned, in order to turn the hope of success into reality, no matter what environment he is in, in the final analysis, he has to rely on his own subjective efforts. In "adversity", you can't succeed without redoubling your efforts; Even in the "golden age", you can't be a talent without sweating. Hua, a famous mathematician, once said, "One point of diligence, one point of talent". This is a wise saying. Comrade Mao Zedong said: "External cause is the condition of change, internal cause is the basis of change, and external cause works through internal cause." This external cause refers to the objective external conditions, namely the environment; The internal cause is subjective self-effort. Without subjective mobilization of internal factors, external factors will not play any role, and a person will not change from "not a talent" to "a talent".
Therefore, if a person wants to achieve something and become a talent, he must have great ambition and perseverance to benefit mankind. Never give up until you reach your goal, never give up when you encounter difficulties, never retreat when you encounter obstacles, and you must keep moving forward and pursuing until you succeed. Don't blame others for a little disappointment, and don't look for reasons subjectively. Generally speaking, our country is "prosperous" for those who want to become talents. However, as China is still a developing country, there are many unsatisfactory places, some of which cannot be changed in a short time. In view of this reality, after recognizing the dialectical relationship between environment and talent, the vast number of young friends must focus on personal subjective efforts.
Worrying about death:
The existence of adversity is only meaningful to the parties concerned. The role played in personal growth is also determined by the performance of the parties. Everyone should have heard that a college student can't peel eggs; Then, for this college student, even an egg with a shell is adversity; It can be seen that people who grow up in prosperity may not be able to respond flexibly to the adversity that needs to be dealt with in reality; On the other hand, if his parents let him take care of himself at an early age, he may encounter "adversity" in the process of learning to peel eggs, but peeling eggs has become "prosperity" at this time, and what he can bear will be more meaningful challenges to his life, rather than facing an egg blankly.
(Answer Skills: "If the other party argues that adversity is conducive to growth, why are you still studying and receiving education here? It is better to go to the streets and beg. What kind of adversity is this! " )
-
Argument: Prosperity is prosperity and adversity is adversity. Man's growth refers to the process that man changes from a natural person to a social person and is fully socialized. According to the healthy development of body and mind and the maturity of social roles, although prosperity and adversity are both life situations that people must face in the process of growing up, relatively speaking, prosperity is more conducive to people's growth.
First of all, from the perspective of people's physical and mental development, on the one hand, scientific nutrition supply and sound public health system are more conducive to people's physical growth than lack of material security and public health services. On the other hand, prosperity is more conducive to the growth of people's minds, including the improvement of cognitive ability, the cultivation of temperament and the cultivation of personality. In adversity, the learning environment is depressing, and we can recognize things, but in prosperity, it provides an encouraging educational atmosphere, which is more conducive to the systematic development of cognition. Adversity can recognize the hardships of life, but it is also prone to anxiety and pain, and even produces alienation and distrust of others. In good times, we can appreciate the warmth of family, the care of society and the value of friendship, thus having a tolerant, open and healthy mentality. In adversity, the cultivation of human character is conditional, and it is easy to go beyond the basic psychological pressure range, leading to personality distortion. In good times, the cultivation of people's character is subtle, and through active education and good temperament, a more sound personality is forged.
Secondly, from the perspective of people's socialization process, on the one hand, wealth is more conducive to meeting the growth needs of all stages of life. When we were children, the care of our families in good times gave us confidence and self-awareness, while children who grew up in broken families were prone to inferiority and suspicion. When we are teenagers, a good education in prosperity can make us succeed in our studies and live a prosperous life, but without education, we temporarily lose the support for growth and the direction of life. When we reach adulthood or even old age, prosperity enables people to gain the motivation for lifelong growth in self-affirmation, while the impact of adversity easily leads to depression and self-denial. On the other hand, prosperity is more conducive to the maturity of people's social roles, because people's growth is always marked by their independent playing of appropriate social roles. Difficulties in adversity are prone to frustration and interrupt the process of life growth. However, sustained social development, sound institutional arrangements and prosperous and harmonious daily life provide more benign space for the maturity of people's social roles.
Good wind, with its strength, helps me to rise to the top. With the downwind, we can spread our wings of growth and fly higher and farther in the sky of life. thank you
That's all I found. :-O-:)
-
You can refute: let's briefly analyze what the other side's argument tells us. They say that prosperity brings people a comfortable environment, and adversity brings people a mechanism. What mechanism will let you know which way is wrong? There are 108 chemical elements. If you want to test which elements are toxic, you can do it one by one, but when you taste the first one, you are dead. In addition, what is human growth? Another person told me that people's growth is the process of guessing chocolate, and we don't agree. In fact, life, like the growth of a tree, needs a stable environment to ensure it. What is the other person's confusion? In adversity, people can grow, and adversity is conducive to people's growth. These are two completely different concepts. Why is it that Edison can sum up his own experience and gain something through experiments? I can tell you that Edison has first-class experimental equipment and first-class laboratory. If these are scarce, don't say that Edison experimented with 50 thousand kinds of materials. I'm afraid he is still wandering in the street, so he can't do scientific research.
Conversely, what can grow in adversity, like Sima Qian's Historical Records, was created in adversity, but adversity is conducive to scientific research. Is this another concept? It is easy to understand that drugs can play the role of medical paralysis, but to demonstrate that drugs are beneficial to people's health, these are two completely different concepts. Why else should we stop drugs? In fact, adversity provides a process of individual experience, while prosperity is a process of all-round development. Are all-round development and the cultivation of some extreme personalities two completely different concepts? In fact, we don't deny what the other side said about adversity. What he said is that adversity brings setbacks to people, and prosperity brings you the ability and conditions to overcome setbacks. Is it more important?
-
Times can create heroes, but also stifle and hinder the progress and emergence of some talents, resulting in the adversity of talent growth. The insufficient demand for military talents in the peaceful and prosperous times is not conducive to the display of people's military talents, and it is a social "adversity" for the growth of military talents; In the era of social revolution, armed struggle or world disintegration, people with military talents came into being to show their ambitions. However, in this era, talents with scientific and technological talent and literary expertise are often faced with the unfavorable situation that there is no way to serve the country by studying. It can be seen that the "status quo" also has a negative side to the growth of specific talents.
Judging from the five social forms experienced by human beings, feudal system and theocracy are the most unfavorable to the growth of talents, and they are also the most destructive to talents. In medieval Europe, the military personnel system was centered on feudal family status, and the status of officers was the hereditary privilege of a few nobles, which blocked the channels for a large number of civilians and their children to become officers and display and give play to their military talents. After Sui and Tang Dynasties, the imperial examination system in China was actually a trap that restricted people from giving full play to their talents. Because of life, the broad masses of workers lost the opportunity to study, and it was impossible for them to take part in the imperial examination and leave their jobs. In the Ming and Qing Dynasties, eight-part essay was used to select scholars, and candidates could only draw a gourd ladle to speak for the ancients, but could not have independent thoughts. The imperial examination system has become a shackle that binds people to become talents. I want to know how many talents are buried in this institutional adversity.
Some old ideas and habits in the history of our country have caused all kinds of adversity, which still fetters the growth and progress of talents. The first is about the habitual adversity of seniority. Whether a highly respected and talented person can enter his position depends on his qualifications. "Fools and sages are all qualified", and promotion must be "ranked according to qualifications, one term after another". The junior should obey the arrangement, endure hardships for many years, and even be buried in the soil for a long time. The second is the interpersonal adversity of jealous talents. In an environment full of jealousy, it is difficult for talents to stand out. Even if you have achievements, you will not feel a sense of accomplishment, but you will feel "heart-warming". Some people don't allow talents to stand out, and even some leaders lack due tolerance. They would rather let talented people be abandoned in vain than let them "show their faces", resulting in potential talents being "stuck by dragons and lying with tigers" Third, close and conservative social, cultural and psychological adversity. China's traditional culture regards conservative and introverted psychological character as the virtue of self-esteem. Philosophy of life such as "It is better to hide than to be smart" and "Don't teach others to swim" are out of the need of so-called "self-esteem". For example, young talents have suggestions and ideas about their work, academic research and opinions, and even have doubts about some authoritative conclusions, but they don't show traces, because once they make jokes, they will be humiliated, despised and lose their "self-esteem." As a result, how many insights have been erased and how many creations can be stillborn? Inappropriate emphasis on self-esteem is tantamount to creating mental shackles and psychological adversity for yourself.