Shaanxi Liu Juanhua's innovation is the highest expression of human talent and the wheel to promote the progress of human society. Throughout history, everyone who has made outstanding achievements has dared to innovate. Dare to innovate, is a very valuable spirit, we should all learn. A story is written in the text "The Third Little Bench" in primary school: Einstein, a world-famous great scientist, handed over a poorly made small bench to his teacher after a work class when he was in primary school. When the teacher was extremely dissatisfied, he took out the first and second small benches from under the desk ... Einstein made the first small bench, why didn't he stop there and do it twice until he thought he was satisfied? This is because of his innovative spirit. It is precisely because of this innovative spirit that he became a world-famous scientist. About 23 years ago, there was a great Greek thinker Aristotle, who thought that the speed of falling objects was proportional to their weight. About 4 years ago, Galileo, an Italian scientist, didn't believe it easily because of what Aristotle said. He overthrew Aristotle's view through experiments and established the law of free fall: all objects have the same acceleration in free fall at the same place if they are not resisted by air. With such innovative spirit, Galileo established the laws of free fall and inertia in physics, and discovered the laws of projectile motion and shimmy. Some people say that the first person who used flowers as a metaphor for a girl was unanimously praised as a genius; The second person who uses metaphor is ridiculed as a mediocre person; When the third person still uses this metaphor, he will be dismissed as a fool. This statement is exaggerated, but the meaning of praising innovation is an irreproachable truth. Hugo said it well: "Even if you successfully imitate a talented person, you lack his original spirit, and this is his genius. Let's praise the masters, but don't imitate them. Let's be ingenious. If it succeeds, of course, it's good. If it fails, what does it matter? " We should advocate innovation, and dare to innovate, instead of following others' footsteps and picking up others' wisdom. Young friends, while we are in the prime of life, work hard. May we be innovative and inventive! A brief comment on this essay on innovation is a typical argumentative paper with clear views, clear levels and a combination of reasons and examples. Focusing on the argument that "being brave in innovation is a very valuable spirit", the author selects two examples, Einstein's making three small benches in a row and Galileo's overthrowing Aristotle's old theory, which show that scientific development cannot be separated from the spirit of innovation; Then quote the famous words of Balzac and Hugo to further prove the importance of originality in theory. Conclusion the whole text is tied up and prayers are issued. Students who regard writing argumentative essays as a daunting task can imitate this model to get started, and then engage in horizontal and vertical strategies. Beijing Lu Beirong The Golden Gate Bridge in the United States is famous for its magnificent architecture and magnificent momentum. Near the Golden Gate Bridge, there is a curved bridge that is deliberately imitated. Except for its appearance, its width and practical value are better than those of the Golden Gate Bridge, but its popularity is far less than that of the Golden Gate Bridge. What is the reason for it Someone said meaningfully, "This is the difference between the first and the second." What is the difference? The Golden Gate Bridge was designed and built after long-term thinking and brewing by designers. It has a unique style and is an innovative bridge. The curved bridge is just a replica of the Golden Gate Bridge, an imitation bridge. Their shapes are similar, but their connotations are quite different, because imitation is only a shallow thinking activity, while innovation is a higher thinking activity, so it is more advanced and more valued by people. It is innovation that drives the progress of human society. It takes courage to innovate. Innovation needs to break the original imprisonment and take risks. Imitating others' old ways is risk-free and requires no courage. Zhang Daqian, who started a generation of landscape painting style, copied the works of Shi Tao, a famous painter in the former Qing Dynasty, and was able to confuse the real with the fake, but he was not satisfied with these. He resolutely gave up imitating other people's works and created his own landscape painting method with infinite courage, which shocked the painting world. If he didn't have the courage to stop making "fakes" of Shi Tao and explore by himself, there would be a mediocre painter in the world and a master who would shine through the history of painting. Innovation requires a high degree of wisdom. Balzac said: The first person who compares a girl to a flower is a genius, the second is a mediocrity, and the third is a fool. Indeed, innovative works can always give people a refreshing feeling, because it has gone through human brain thinking activities, from quantitative change to qualitative change, and is the crystallization of wisdom. Imitation is only a shallow re-creation. If innovation is compared to writing an article, imitation is just turning it into type and printing a few more articles. But this does not mean that we should reject imitation blindly. Imitation is also a practical activity, from which people can get innovative inspiration and find innovative ways. But we can't be confined to imitation. Qi Baishi once said: "Those who learn from me live like I die." The word "learning" reflects the process from imitation to innovation. "Like" means being satisfied with imitation and not moving forward. If the designers of curved bridges "learn" rather than "resemble", surely there will be another wonder in the world. At present, with the reform and opening up, new things are constantly emerging. We need to imitate, but we need to innovate more. We should put down our burdens, start the machine, and build a bridge with China characteristics to a bright future with a hundred times of courage and innovative spirit! The brief comment links imitation with innovation, which makes writing more difficult, but the author has a good idea of it. The article does not simply promote this and suppress the other, but points out the difference in thinking levels between the two, and affirms the value and importance of innovation. At the same time, it also points out that "people can get innovative inspiration and find innovative ways". The conclusion that "we need imitation, but we need innovation more" is objective and fair. The novelty of the opening example, the following examples and the accurate analysis when quoting all add luster to the discussion. I hope these are helpful to you!