The accountability system should be a supporting project integrating accountability, accountability and responsibility, covering all aspects and links of decision-making, implementation, supervision and before, during and after the event. Accountability is the premise and foundation. People usually call leaders "responsible persons". Since you are the person in charge, you must first make clear which affairs you are responsible for, and what are the contents and requirements of each transaction. For these affairs, there should be not only qualitative requirements, but also quantitative indicators in the assessment and evaluation. In this way, the accountability of performance of duties can be followed by rules and regulations. To solve this problem, an important aspect is to make the responsibilities of leaders clear and specific, that is, to be accountable. To investigate the responsibility, it is necessary to solve the problem of strict enforcement of rules and violations. Accountability is to track the performance of leaders, reward cadres who are conscientious, and investigate cadres who are dereliction of duty. A good system needs not only reasonable contents and standardized procedures, but also strict implementation and clear rewards and punishments. If we cannot scientifically evaluate the performance of leading cadres and strictly investigate dereliction of duty, we will not achieve the desired results. Frequent accidents in some units and departments, inadequate implementation of the responsibility system and lax punishment for dereliction of duty are also important reasons. Whether it is accountability or accountability, its purpose is not only to deal with the relevant responsible persons, but more importantly, to urge leaders to take responsibility and dare to take responsibility, so as to better promote the cause. In other words, accountability and accountability are both means, and responsibility is the purpose.