Comrade Bethune's selfless dedication is manifested in his extreme responsibility for his work and his extreme enthusiasm for comrades and the people. Every party member should learn from him. Many people are irresponsible for their work, choose the light and fear the heavy, pass the burden on to others, and choose the light. At present, consider yourself first, then others.
I feel great except for a little effort, and I like to brag, for fear that others will not know. He is not enthusiastic about comrades and the people, but indifferent, indifferent and insensitive. This kind of person is not actually party member in * * *, at least not party member in pure * * *. No one who came back from the front spoke of Bethune without admiration and without being moved by his spirit.
The soldiers and civilians in the Shanxi-Chahar-Hebei border region were moved by Dr. Bethune's treatment and his work. Every producer in party member should learn from Comrade Bethune's true spirit of capitalism.
Extended data:
The article uses comparative reasoning in many places, which enhances the persuasiveness of the article. The contrast in the second paragraph is particularly obvious. Comrade Bethune was "extremely responsible for his work" and "many people were irresponsible for their work". Comrade Bethune's "extreme enthusiasm for comrades and people" is compared with the four main manifestations of many people's "lack of enthusiasm for comrades and people"
One is "altruism, dedication to others", "every party member should learn", and the other is selfishness. "In fact, it is not * * * party member, at least not pure * * * party member", which is particularly striking.
In contrast, the third paragraph criticizes "a group of people", who change their minds, despise technical work and think there is no way out. Organizing these contents in an argumentative sentence has strong pertinence and practical significance, and also makes the written focus prominent and the sentence patterns changeable.