1. If you don’t climb the mountain, you won’t know how high the sky is. If you don’t go down to the deep stream, write a 600-word essay.
There is an old saying that goes, “If you don’t climb the mountain, you won’t know how high the sky is. If you are not near a deep stream, you will not know how thick the earth is. ”
In my opinion, this sentence is not only to describe the height of the sky and the thickness of the earth, but also to remind us: there are people outside. There is always a bright future, so keep a humble attitude and a never-ending mentality! Don’t be a frog in the well!
We all know that there are no absolutes in the world, that is to say, they all have objective relativity!
When we are satisfied with our current situation, thinking that we have achieved our goals and are on top of the world! But in fact, it is still far from reaching that peak! Just like "If you don't climb a mountain, you don't know how high the sky is; if you don't go to a deep stream, you don't know how thick the earth is." The meaning expressed by this sentence: When we think that we know how high the sky is when we stand on the flat ground, as long as you Once you climb a high mountain, you will realize that the conclusions we reached on the ground are wrong! When we think we know how thick the earth is on the ground, once you dive into a deeper stream (generally speaking, water), you will understand that our judgment of how thick the earth is is incorrect!
In fact, the contrast of things can be divided into horizontal contrast and vertical contrast. Just as our judgment of the height of the sky and the thickness of the earth is only on the ground, this is a horizontal contrast; and when we climb mountains , wade into the stream to compare our previous judgments, this is a vertical comparison!
We do not comment that horizontal comparison must be correct, nor do we comment that vertical comparison must be wrong! Because the most important thing for us as a result of the comparison between them is to let us understand a truth: that is, use your energy in endless exploration and pursuit, rather than wasting it on meaningless comparison!
"If you don't climb a mountain, you don't know how high the sky is; if you don't go to a deep stream, you don't know how thick the earth is." I think the most appropriate thing to do is to serve as a warning for us! Always remind yourself not to give up, not to give up, not to be proud, not to be complacent! Only in this way can we climb higher mountains, dive into deeper streams, and seek results closer to objective facts! Explore every unknown area and find out the truth that belongs to this area!
Due to my limited knowledge and limited knowledge, I can only provide such an article with ideas, for reference only! 2. If you don’t climb a mountain, you don’t know how high the sky is; if you don’t stand by a deep stream, you don’t know how deep the earth is.
Reference for you:
State of mind - never stop
There is an old saying that goes, "If you don't climb a mountain, you don't know how high the sky is; if you don't go to a deep stream, you don't know how thick the earth is."
In my opinion, this sentence is not just to describe The height of the sky and the thickness of the earth remind us: there are people outside the world, and there is heaven outside the sky. We must maintain a humble attitude and a never-ending mentality! Don’t be a frog in the well!
We all know that there are no absolutes in the world, that is to say, they all have objective relativity!
When we are satisfied with our current situation, thinking that we have achieved our goals and are on top of the world! But in fact, it is still far from reaching that peak! Just like "If you don't climb a mountain, you don't know how high the sky is; if you don't go to a deep stream, you don't know how thick the earth is." The meaning expressed by this sentence: When we think that we know how high the sky is when we stand on the flat ground, as long as you Once you climb a high mountain, you will realize that the conclusions we reached on the ground are wrong! When we think we know how thick the earth is on the ground, once you dive into a deeper stream (generally speaking, water), you will understand that our judgment of how thick the earth is is incorrect!
In fact, the contrast of things can be divided into horizontal contrast and vertical contrast. Just as our judgment of the height of the sky and the thickness of the earth is only on the ground, this is a horizontal contrast; and when we climb mountains , wade into the stream to compare our previous judgments, this is a vertical comparison!
We do not comment that horizontal comparison must be correct, nor do we comment that vertical comparison must be wrong! Because the most important thing for us as a result of the comparison between them is to let us understand one truth: that is, use your energy in endless exploration and pursuit, rather than wasting it on meaningless comparison!
"If you don't climb a mountain, you don't know how high the sky is; if you don't go to a deep stream, you don't know how thick the earth is." I think the most appropriate one should be a warning for us! Always remind yourself not to give up, not to give up, not to be proud, not to be complacent! Only in this way can we climb higher mountains, dive into deeper streams, and seek results closer to objective facts! Explore every unknown area and find out the truth that belongs to this area! 3. Imitate sentences, urgent
You don’t know the depth of the water without crossing it.
Nothing happens, no wisdom is gained.
If you don’t go deep into the mountains, you won’t be able to dig out treasures; if you don’t work hard, you won’t be able to find the truth.
If you don’t climb the mountains, you won’t see the plains.
If you don’t climb high mountains, you don’t know how high the sky is; if you don’t enter deep valleys, you don’t know how deep the earth is.
If you don’t enter the tiger’s den, you won’t get the tiger’s cubs.
If you don’t eat Coptis chinensis, you won’t know the bitterness of the medicine.
If you don’t travel thousands of miles, there will be no iron feet.
You cannot become a good sailor without drinking a few sips of sea water.
If you don’t compare, you don’t know. If you compare, you will be shocked.
If you don’t see it, you don’t know it, and if you don’t do it, you won’t know it.
If you don’t experience the cold of winter, you won’t know the warmth of spring.
How can there be the fragrance of plum blossoms without a chill to the bones?
If you don’t take the burden, you don’t know the weight; if you don’t take the long road, you don’t know the distance.
I won’t cry until I see the coffin.
Don’t lift the pot until it’s hot enough.
One practical action is better than a dozen programs.
One cannot learn to swim on land.
You can’t become fat with one bite, and you can’t reach the horizon with one step.
A long journey begins near, and big things start from small things.
No matter how high the clouds are, they are always under the sun; no matter how bright the moon is, they cannot dry the grains. 4. Write an argumentative essay based on the theory that you will not know how high the sky is without climbing a mountain.
The copyright of papers is subject to voluntary registration. Regardless of whether the paper is registered or not, the copyright obtained by the author or other copyright holders according to law will not be affected. The purpose of my country's voluntary registration system for works is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of authors or other copyright owners and users of works, to help resolve copyright disputes caused by copyright ownership, and to provide preliminary evidence for the resolution of copyright disputes.
(1) The references at the end of the article are not numbered, they are only arranged according to their importance or the order of reference at the end of the article. (2) Page numbers are not included in references after the text. (3) The bibliographic items and order of references at the end of the article are basically the same as the notes. 1) The bibliography can reflect the scientific attitude of the author of the paper and the fact that the paper has a real and extensive scientific basis. It also reflects the starting point and depth of the paper. 2) Documenting references can easily distinguish the author's achievements from those of predecessors. 3) The bibliography can serve as an index. 4) Describing references helps save the length of the paper. 5) Bibliographic references help scientific and technological intelligence personnel conduct intelligence research and abstract metrology research.
a. Report
[Serial number] Main person responsible. Document title [Document type identifier]. Place of publication: publisher, year of publication.
b. Journal article
[Serial number] Main person responsible. Document title [J]. Journal title, year, volume (issue). He Lingxiu. Reading Gu Cheng's "History of the Southern Ming Dynasty" [J]. Research on Chinese History, 1998(3).
c. On the Documents
[Serial Number] The person mainly responsible for the extracted documents. The title of the extracted documents [A]. The person mainly responsible for the original documents (optional). Original Title of the document [C]. Place of publication: Publisher, year of publication. Qu Qiubai. Problems of Modern Civilization and Socialism [A]. Luo Rongqu. From Westernization to Modernization [C]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1990.
d. Newspaper articles
Types of papers
In order to explore and master the writing rules and characteristics of papers, papers need to be classified. Because the content and nature of the paper itself are different, as well as the research fields, objects, methods, and presentation methods, papers have different classification methods. According to the nature of content and research methods, papers can be divided into theoretical papers, experimental papers, descriptive papers and design papers. There is also a comprehensive classification method, which divides papers into four categories: topic type, argumentation type, review type and comprehensive type:
Topic type
This is before analysis A paper that expresses opinions in the form of direct discussion based on the research results of others and puts forward an academic issue in a certain discipline from the front.
Debate type
This is another person’s opinion on a certain academic issue in a certain subject. With sufficient arguments, it focuses on exposing its shortcomings or errors and is expressed in the form of a debate. An essay of insights.
Review type
This is based on summarizing and summarizing the research results of previous or current people on a certain academic issue in a certain discipline, introducing or commenting on it, and then publishing it. A kind of paper based on one's own opinions.
Comprehensive type
This is a kind of paper written by organically combining the two forms of review type and argument type.