The first is the scientist Li Aizhen. In sharp contrast with Academician Jiu, Li Aizhen, a top scientist in China, is a Taishan figure in the semiconductor field in China. After graduating from Fudan University, Li Aizhen entered the Shanghai Metallurgical Research Institute of China Academy of Sciences. But later, for the needs of the country, the research direction shifted from metallurgy to semiconductors, and the main field was information science? Semiconductor quantum nanostructures and devices? Direction.
Second, Li Aizhen's research is of great significance to China. In 1980s, western countries imposed an embargo on molecular beam epitaxy equipment in China. In this situation, Li Aizhen led the research team to make China's own molecular beam epitaxy equipment, which directly forced the western countries to lift the embargo. This achievement is of great significance to China. During the research period, Li Aizhen won the international invention exhibition patent 2 1 item and the silver award 1 item. But it is puzzling that people who have made such great contributions have been rejected four times on the grounds of lack of ability and age. But in 2007, Li Aizhen was elected as a foreign academician of the National Academy of Sciences.
3. Where is Li Aizhen worse than Wang Li? I really don't want to talk about the strength comparison between the two people. Wang Li's honor is the national liquor judge and the national senior wine brewing judge. Li Aizhen has won numerous honors, including 5 national scientific and technological progress awards in China and 16 provincial and ministerial awards. But in the academician selection, Li Aizhen lost to Wang Li. I hope that the selection criteria of academicians can speak with strength, not with background and money.