Philosophically speaking, it is to concentrate on the key points. (Of course, we should also make overall planning. )
1. To use this sentence in commercial warfare is to put important resources on one or more centralized projects.
For example, if you are a businessman, you must surpass your opponent. If you have ten products to compete with, then you will inevitably disperse your manpower, material resources and financial resources, and the result will be a tug-of-war and a protracted war between the two sides. If you concentrate on developing and marketing a product, it will be a fatal blow to the enemy. Take it. We can break it one by one.
Apply this sentence to daily life.
Focus on what you think is most important. For example, if you want to do a project, and you play with women or other things at the same time. So what do I do?
3 interpersonal relationships
Instead of making a bunch of fair-weather friends, it is better to make a mentor who can help your career.
And give someone a hundred things, it is better to give her what she wants most. Not necessarily diamond rings and flowers, but it's true.
In the war, the other side has 1000 troops, which is more valuable, killing 3000 people or injuring 8000 people?
Of course, it is best to kill them all, but this is impossible.
3,000 people were killed, and the remaining 7,000 people may be demoralized and defeated like a mountain. In the last battle, they may retreat strategically and flee in all directions.
If another 8,000 people are injured, then another 2,000 people who are not injured may adopt the above method. More likely to help 8000 wounded people.
What can the other 8,000 wounded people do? Keep fighting? Or simply surrender?
Different ways of fighting have different ways of dealing with it.
In the era of cold weapons, it is a very good thing to get 8000 wounded. These people are all strong laborers after being injured, so ten fingers are definitely more valuable than one finger.
In the era of hot weapons, it is estimated that 8,000 wounded people have broken their arms and legs, and the treatment cost is extremely high. Breaking one finger is more valuable than breaking ten fingers.
At work, I wrote 10 work plans in a week, but I didn't finish any at the weekend. Only one work plan was written in a week, and it was finished. Is to concentrate on one thing.
Fighting the "war of annihilation" is Mao Zedong's specialty. When the enemy is strong and we are weak, fighting with the enemy is like comparing treasures with beggars and dragons. "For a strong enemy, failure is basically not a decisive thing. The war of annihilation immediately had a major impact on any enemy. " Defeat the enemy, even if it is possible to beat him away, but the enemy's effective strength still exists, and he will come back, which is still a threat to us. A war of annihilation is to destroy or capture all the enemies, and no one can escape. In this way, only a small number of enemies are afraid of being annihilated, and their strength has also been weakened. Therefore, Mao Zedong said: "For people, it is better to break one finger than to hurt ten fingers; For the enemy, it is better to destroy one of its divisions than to defeat its ten divisions. "
To annihilate the enemy, we must have absolute military superiority. The enemy is strong and we are weak, so we can only annihilate them part by part. Too much greed weakens the troops, and insufficient strength cannot achieve the goal of annihilating the enemy. Therefore, fighting a war of annihilation, in a sense, is to concentrate superior forces and break them one by one.
This is also a war of annihilation. In the first counter-campaign against "encirclement and suppression", Mao Zedong used the method of luring the enemy into depth, introducing the enemy who was advancing alone into a pre-set pocket, tying him up as soon as he entered the pocket, and then dealing a heavy blow to the enemy. In this way, the Battle of Longgang wiped out Zhang Huizan's so-called "iron-blooded strategist". The war of annihilation can also be "closing the door and beating the dog". For example, in the Liaoshen campaign, Jinzhou was attacked first, and the passage from the northeast to Shanhaiguan was cut off. The enemy was surrounded by the special terrain in the northeast and solved one by one.
The war of annihilation can take many other forms, but its basic requirements are inseparable from the following points.
Terrain: It's better to be a complicated mountainous area. For example, Jinggangshan area and Loess Plateau.
The principle of equality is more difficult.
Tactics: concentrate superior forces and surround them in a roundabout way.
Use of force: the principle of concentration.
Command: Centralized command.
1 947 65438+1on October 25th, Mao Zedong summarized two conditions for waging a big annihilation war in his telegram to the Shanxi-Chahar-Hebei Military Region: (1) to contain other parts of the enemy with small parts, to concentrate the absolutely superior forces to fight one enemy, never to fight two enemies at the same time, and never to contain them with many parts. (2) Use one to hit the front and use the main force to detour. Never use the main force to hit the front, use a detour. And asked the Shanxi-Chahar-Hebei Military Region to fight several large-scale annihilation wars according to this requirement and the past experience. Fighting a large-scale annihilation war is mainly about the deployment of troops and tactics. When these two problems are solved, it will be no problem to fight a large-scale annihilation war. During the war of liberation, wars of annihilation were fought everywhere, including three major battles, and the policy of fighting wars of annihilation was also adopted. Therefore, when the enemy is weak and we are strong, annihilation, as a tactic in the strategic decisive battle, can fully exert its power. In positional warfare, annihilation is characterized by thorough, clean and thorough elimination.
This idea can be applied to today's political and economic fields. This is also a major contradiction and a minor contradiction.
For example, in the political and ideological field of our country, a general grasp will lead to a bad grasp of everything. It's better to do it one by one, catch it one by one, and get twice the result with half the effort. At present, China's political focus should be the government's anti-corruption campaign.
In the economic field, buying and selling should be done one by one according to one's own strength, and business should be done one by one. Don't attack from many sides, which will easily lead to a passive situation.
This topic can also be analogized. For example, in social life, there is a saying that it is enough for a person to have a confidant. This is a wise saying. If you make a friend who knows you, it is much better than making many ordinary so-called friends, and ordinary friends are likely to miss real friends.
There are always some relationships that we have to give up, and only two people are struggling. I arranged it below, please enjoy it.
£º
1, don't forget what you