Objective: The Spanish newspaper Revolution published esteban Balenty's Two Globalisations on July 14, 2002. It also disagrees with the statement that globalization has more advantages than disadvantages for all countries, but believes that there are two kinds of globalization: "globalization of rich countries" and "globalization of poor countries". The article said: These two kinds of globalization are increasingly separated by visible high walls. There are less than 30 countries in this high wall, and its powerful core is the Group of Seven, where 1 1% of the world's population lives and its GDP accounts for 70% of the world. "Globalization is profitable for them, so they strive to turn this globalization into the economic and political beliefs of all mankind. If possible, turn it into something eternal. " Beyond the high wall is another kind of globalization, which is poverty, backwardness and underdevelopment. Balenty's article actually said that globalization is good for western developed countries and bad for developing countries.
Summary: The painful historical lessons have made people in developing countries have a better understanding of globalization, so that people who were one-sided enthusiastic about globalization a few years ago now turn to look at globalization calmly and comprehensively. In developing countries, more and more people now accept the view that on the one hand, globalization may be an opportunity and benefit; On the other hand, globalization may be a kind of risk and disaster. More and more people also realize from the reality of financial crisis and economic crisis in recent years that opportunities and benefits are mostly potential, while risks and disasters are mostly realistic. It is too early to say that the benefits of globalization outweigh the disadvantages for developing countries.
Whether globalization does more harm than good or benefits than harm to developing countries does not depend on the gifts and alms of developed countries, and they will not give any gifts and alms to developing countries, but on developing countries themselves.