If you want to get a high score in the summary and improve the overall score of the test paper, you must do the following:

1, graded. For example, when expressing a problem, can we distinguish the problem from the cause and performance of the problem? When stating reasons, there are subjective and objective points, or, which are superficial reasons and which are fundamental factors; Whether the impact can be divided into short-term impact and long-term impact; When stating the countermeasures, can you answer them from the aspects of ideology, institutional mechanism, legal system, social supervision, technological innovation and capital investment? Or something else? Of course, these are just references, and the specific operation should be based on reality. In addition, if you can't see it or really think it's rare, don't force yourself to be layered.

2, organized. After the necessary integration and induction, similar contents will be marked with serial numbers.

3. Be concise. When reading the material, you should lock the key words in the sentence and ensure that the whole article is nonsense and full of words.

4. It has its own characteristics. If the measures to be taken are summarized as "one basic point, two necessities", "two enhancements, two supplements" and the impact is summarized as "one long and two short", it will give the examiner a refreshing feeling to some extent.

5. Be beautiful. Don't alter the answer sheet a lot. If you can't be beautiful, you will be neat and tidy, and take care of the examiner's mood.

Second, the countermeasures

How to express or choose countermeasures in the examination room?

Operational countermeasures generally involve: subject, way, concrete practice (verb-object structure) and purpose. In addition, some key points of the response measures should be presented in a logical way, which can be presented in accordance with the logic of the total score, that is, the core response key words, short sentences or general sentences should be added before each key point of the response measures.

Third, comprehensive analysis questions

1, sentence understanding type

First of all, express your point of view, combine the questions and materials, and explain the meaning of words and sentences in a simple sentence or two; Then, demonstrate the above viewpoints, which can be data examples or theories; Finally, I draw an appropriate conclusion and explain the enlightenment of this sentence to reality in one or two sentences with data. If there is no countermeasure enlightenment in the data, it needs to be inferred according to the "problem".

2. Viewpoint type

Combining information, the first step is to show attitude; Then, demonstrate the above viewpoint and explain the reason for holding this viewpoint (from the data), which can be an example or a theory; Finally, the appropriate conclusion is drawn, and the enlightenment significance to reality is briefly explained in combination with the data.

3. Contrast type. To combine the data, the first step is to comprehensively explain the advantages and disadvantages/advantages and disadvantages/similarities and differences of A and B, and the following steps are the same as the types of opinions.

Fourth, in the face of practical writing, we should "take our time"

Practical writing is the "highlight" of the whole small problem. If you want to keep clear thinking and get high marks in practical writing, you need to pay attention to the following three points:

1, looking for ideas in the stalk.

The longer the question, the more information will be prompted. When reading the stem, we should pay attention to its identity, occasion, intention, language, object and requirements. When you see the information related to "identity, occasion and object", you should pay attention to your language style, whether what you say is in line with reality and what you need to avoid; From the "quasi-answer", you can roughly know what to write at the beginning and end of the article; Grasping format requirements from "literary genre"

2. Arrange troops in the content.

In most cases, the key contents of the article can be defined directly from the article, such as suggestions, opinions, plans, working ideas, work plans, work outlines, work plans, etc. The key content of these languages falls on countermeasures. Therefore, the key part of the article should focus on expressing countermeasures; If you can't know the train of thought from the text, you need to combine the information and analyze the specific problems.

3. Explain in words.

Most practical writing has clear requirements for language expression, such as "vivid language and vivid image", which requires us to introduce some rhetorical devices in writing, such as metaphor, parallelism, duality and personification, so as to make the article more attractive to read.

Fifth, refuse to demonstrate the "persistent problem" in the composition.

Diversified and rich argumentation methods are undoubtedly one of the secrets of high scores in composition. Here are some brief summaries for you:

1, example method

The specific writing logic is: describing examples+enlightening.

To make good use of examples, we must pay attention to:

First, the case should be typical, conclusive and influential. Generally speaking, celebrities or examples should be given priority.

Second, the narrative of the case should be concise and not too detailed. Examples are given to prove points, not to clarify facts. Never put the cart before the horse.

Third, the examples should not be single and narrow, but rich and broad, and should be combined with points and faces. When similar cases have been mastered for a long time, you can consider sentence parallelism.

Fourth, we should make a brief analysis after listing cases, and we should not turn the example method into case sorting to avoid undocumented cases.

Step 2 introduce the method

Prove your point of view by quoting famous sayings, ancient poems and famous sentences, proverbs and epigrams that reflect scientific laws, such as emphasizing the importance of determination, choosing "the three armed forces can win the handsome, but the ordinary man can't win the ambition", emphasizing that the ambition is high, and choosing "How can a sparrow know the ambition of a swan?"

3. Comparative method

One is analogy, that is, reasoning from one to another with the help of one or several similar stories, examples or situations arranged by the author. There are several kinds of things used for analogy: historical facts, myths and legends, fables, situations created by writers themselves, etc.

The second is the contrast method, that is, the positive and negative arguments and arguments are analyzed and compared, so as to deny the wrong views and establish the correct arguments.