The following answers will inevitably involve comparisons. I am a fan of Spielberg and Kubrick, and a slight fan of Nolan (those who are disgusted by stupid fans), so if you are uncomfortable with it, you don’t have to read it. .

Fortunately, objectively speaking, Nolan has created a new way of combining narrative and suspense. (I haven’t seen many Hitchcock movies, so let’s put it that way) In addition, The Dark Knight is the first in the history of superhero movies that dares to explore deep connotations. It has risen to a certain height. In addition, Heath Ledger's incredible acting skills contributed to this work. If the first part of the Batman trilogy is the foreshadowing and the second part is the pinnacle, then the third part is just a continuation. The Batman series is all that.

But in terms of non-linear narrative skills, Nolan still cannot compare with Quentin and Guy Ritchie. Nolan's strength lies in giving people a smooth narrative pleasure. Moreover, Nolan's handling of fighting scenes and emotional scenes is unbearable, which is what is called a romance novel written by a science student that makes people feel pale. It goes without saying how awkward the snow scene in Inception is and the fights in the Batman trilogy are. All in all, Nolan looks at the world and is still strong enough despite the praise of those crazy fans. It's just that those who surpassed Spielberg and Kubrick's successor should just laugh and forget about these words.