Two words: nonsense.
The original text of this sentence circulating on the Internet is like this:
A man who doesn't smoke or drink can't be entrusted for life.
According to legend, this is the famous saying of green gang boss Du:
However, this is also nonsense, because Du never said this sentence, and Du was dying. At the beginning, a girl found a boyfriend who smoked and asked me if you smoked. When I said no, she told me, "Du said that men who don't smoke can't be trusted." This is a typical person who is victimized by rumors. It doesn't matter if her boyfriend smokes or not, but it is out of her mind to say that "people who don't smoke or drink are not worth trusting".
According to the version circulated ten years ago, Du's original words are as follows:
Most people who don't smoke or drink are strict with themselves. Those who are generally obsessed with "debauchery, wealth and cigarettes" can be imprisoned for life. Be careful!
Well, even so, I have to say that even this sentence is not what Du said at all. There was no information about this sentence before 2009. In this year, someone refined and modified the ancient classics and made this sentence. By 20 1 1, someone has moved this sentence to a book called "Farewell to Single in 30 Days". Since 20 1 1, this sentence has been inserted into Du's famous saying. Next is the counterattack of smokers and alcoholics!
Well, even so, I have to say that even this sentence is not what Du said at all.
Some smokers and alcoholics have deleted and changed the original words, directly changed the original intention, and even posted them online:
This is not bad. Later, someone directly satirized people who don't smoke or drink, and translated the words into this:
You can search these two pieces of information, both of which are very popular and even regarded as the standard by many girls. Anyway, the spirit is crazy. Ok, you smoke and drink, I know you are a good boy, ok?
In a word, smoking and drinking are common things, not bad things, but once you are greedy, it is by no means a good thing. If smoking and drinking are regarded as noble personality, Du San, a student who collects accounts in guanxian, doesn't agree. If we insist that men who don't smoke are unreliable, then all the ancient sages before tobacco was introduced to China (late Ming Dynasty) were unreliable. This is obviously a good suggestion for smokers and alcoholics to delete it. Why did they come up and ask, "How do you understand this sentence?"?
Here, let's popularize the statement of "debauchery and wealth (plus a" smoke after the Ming Dynasty) "in the broom draft of the Song Dynasty, which is also the consistent statement of ancient China:
Let me translate:
Ok, next is the advertising time:
1.
2.
3.
Well, anyway: