Narrating first and then discussing, from reality to fiction, from things to truth, embodies the principle of putting facts and reasoning, so it is natural and natural to read; It is your criticism, the facts are there, and the irrefutable evidence makes the argument against the enemy irrefutable.

Moreover, "narrative first" is also a simple and attractive way to create a scene, through "narrative first", or to outline the image. Or present facts or tell arguments to arouse readers' interest and attention, so as to attract readers to the track of "post-discussion"

Talk to each other. The discussion is timely and quick, which is convenient for taking advantage of the gap to attack the virtual. At the same time, it can make the article appear dense and harmonious, ups and downs, and relaxed. There are two situations: one is the side discussion of the same paragraph, and the other is the discussion with the narrative, which is called narrative discussion.

Discuss before you speak. Simple discussion before narration is rare in essays. Narration is often used at the back, with discussion as the main point, notes at the end, facts as the auxiliary argument. His writing intention is "facts speak louder than words", and he uses facts to give his opponent a "counterattack" in the final round.

Extended data

Narrative

1, summary method. In other words, it is more common to summarize the event itself or process in concise language to trigger discussion. For example, there is an article entitled "The Disease of Applause", which begins: "When an actor sings to a vivid point in the theater, the audience can't help but be full. For actors and audiences, this is a normal communication.

However, applause should always be timely, timely and even quantitative. Improper is harmful. "It is to describe the incident of refueling in the theater first, and then lead to the argument that" refueling is always at the right time, and its business, even its quantity, is very expensive ". Improper is harmful. " This makes people feel natural and appropriate.

2. Extraction method. That is, directly extract the relevant language of the characters in the process of the incident, leaving out the narrative of the incident itself, and the extracted language of the characters is directly related to the argument.

For example, there is an article "Flattering Me as My Thief", which begins with this: "It is said that Comrade Guo Moruo often encourages scientists with this proverb:' The wicked are my teachers, the good are my friends, and the flatterers are my thieves.' This is really a wise saying. It is not difficult for people to understand this truth, but it is not easy to do it. "Thus get down to business, make people feel simple and lively.