There are many units in the test questions that are "three stooges are better than one Zhuge Liang", but there are also many units that are "three monks have no water to drink". Please explain this phenomenon and share your views.

Analyzing famous sayings and aphorisms

This question tests the core comprehensive analysis ability

The main lines of the answer are discussed separately + comprehensive summary

Refer to the answer "Three "A cobbler is as good as a Zhuge Liang" means that as long as everyone in a unit is united sincerely, unites as one, gives full play to their respective advantages and cooperates with each other, the work can be done well.

"Three monks have no water to drink" means that if there is no cooperation and selfishness in a unit, then no matter how many people there are, the work cannot be done well.

Regarding this phenomenon, I think the above polarization is caused by the following reasons:

Awareness of teamwork. Only when people in a unit unite sincerely for a common goal can they have cohesion, centripetal force and combat effectiveness, and can they do a good job. If everyone works independently, even if everyone is excellent, they will do bad things, because many of our jobs require the cooperation of people with multiple aspects of knowledge and abilities to complete.

System construction. Only by establishing an effective restraint and incentive mechanism can a unit unleash everyone's enthusiasm, initiative and creativity for work, otherwise it will be like scattered sand with no achievements.

Reasonable division of labor. A job usually requires several people to complete it at the same time. Only by giving full play to each person's comparative advantages in this job and rationally allocating tasks can work efficiency be improved.

Finally, as national public officials, we must establish a sense of unity and a spirit of cooperation. Only in this way can we complete the tasks assigned by the party and the people.

Experts’ comments These two famous aphorisms illustrate the importance of unity and cooperation from both positive and negative aspects. When answering this type of question, we must also discuss it from two aspects respectively, and finally make a comprehensive summary and improve it in conjunction with the actual work.