This sentence "There are no eternal friends in the world, only eternal interests" is simply an abetment and a highly poisonous drug. I don't know how many young men and women have been misled into mistaking it as a wise saying. If everyone thinks so and lives for their own interests regardless of everything, can our civilization still progress? Does it have nothing to do with promoting the progress of human civilization? If this statement is taken as a guideline, it is likely to lead to serious polarization and even unipolarization of the human spirit, which is collective degeneration and degradation! This sentence may sometimes be true between countries, but it absolutely cannot be advocated between people. It should be denied, criticized, and completely liquidated!

In this sentence, "friends", "forever" and "interests" are not wrong. The mistake is that "forever" and "the world" are used to make "friends" and "interests" absolute. ation, opposition, and connection, leading to misunderstandings by many people. The mistake in this sentence is that there is no premise and no object, but only the scope of application or adverbials. So it looks like philosophy, but it's actually poison. There are no absolute things in the world, and there is no absolute truth. "Friends" generally refers to the relationship between people. It is a group of people who come together due to various tacit understandings and synchronizations. They are made with the heart, made with the heart, and are spiritual things. They are not originally This is related to the word "interest" on the material level. However, it is understandable that friends have consistent "interests" needs, and it is also the basis of "friends". Obviously, it is wrong to make "friends" and "interests" absolute or even antagonistic. The mistake in this sentence is that the words "in the world" and "forever" are used to oppose, separate and make "friends" and "interests" absolute. It seems to mean that the relationship between people is not a friendship. It is a relationship of interest or an "enemy" relationship. It is wrong to use this sentence to describe or define the relationship between people.

We must believe that among people, except for parents, family members, children, relatives, friends, classmates and colleagues, most people are strangers and ordinary people who can live in harmony. Unity, friendship, good-neighborliness, and win-win cooperation are the proper ways to be a human being and to conduct yourself in the world.

British Prime Minister Palmerston said something in the 19th century. The original words were "A country does not have permanent friends, only permanent interests" (literal translation: A country does not have permanent friends, only permanent interests) ), his true meaning in Chinese should be "The British Empire has no permanent friends, only permanent interests" or as British Prime Minister Churchill said: "There are no permanent friends between countries, only permanent interests." This sentence was first used to describe the relationship between countries. Now it has become a basic diplomatic concept for getting along between countries and serves as the theoretical support for variable state relations.

"There are no eternal friends in the world, only eternal interests." This is a misinformation.