In real life or work and study, everyone has tried to write a composition, which can bring our scattered thoughts together. Have no clue when writing a composition? The following are five short essays on the debate I collected for your reference, hoping to help friends in need.
Debate composition 1 This afternoon, our class held a debate. The theme of this debate is: Is money everything?
At the beginning of the debate, Wang Zhongyi said, "Money makes the mare go. Have you ever heard this sentence? " ? This sentence alone is enough to prove that money is everything. "Wang Zhongyi's words gave us a blow. I replied without thinking: "money can't buy time, life, safety, health, wisdom and love." "There was a burst of laughter in the classroom, and Yang Dongyu immediately retorted," Then I want to ask another debater that you have grown up. If you have no money, which girl will marry you? "Laughter rang out again in the classroom. I saw our Wang Lin stand up, and I waited nervously for his answer, "Love based on money is not true love." "Ha ha ..." Everyone laughed even harder.
The other party was silent for a while, and Yang Dongyu asked, "Who doesn't love money?" "I immediately took up the topic:" In prison, even if you have money, you can't spend it all. " Once again, we had a heated argument, and no one would let anyone go. Wang Zhongyi asked, "Can you live without money? "Our Yang Xinjie slowly retorted," As long as you work, you can support yourself. " The other side was silent, and our Xu Liming pursued the victory: "Excuse me, have you heard a story?" Once upon a time, there was a rich man and a farmer who were neighbors. The rich man is sad all day, always worried that someone will rob him of his money, while the farmers work at sunrise all day and have a good time at sunset. One day, the rich man saw the farmer's hard work and gave him a bag of gold coins. From then on, the farmer was unhappy and worried that his money would be taken away. Therefore, money is not everything, sometimes it will take away a person's happiness and bring trouble to people. "... the wonderful debate continued, and applause and laughter continued in the classroom. Finally, the teacher declared that both sides were right and tied.
From this debate, I understand that when we look at a thing from different angles, we will get different answers.
On Wednesday afternoon, in the class, we had an interesting and tense debate.
After a nap that day, we came to the classroom and set the table on opposite sides of the debate. Four judges, Mr. Wu, Mr. Chen, Mr. Zhang and Mr. Ni, sat tight, and two timekeepers, Chen Jiahe and Xu Ying, who were sitting at the door, stood by. This scene makes us both excited and nervous. I didn't become the protagonist of the game, but became an opposing audience.
The debate began, and the pros and cons first expressed their opinions. They all talk in an orderly way and want to kill their opponents at once. The whole stadium is full of smoke. To tell the truth, I really didn't expect the debate to be so intense! Soon, it was the audience's turn to speak freely, and it was a big loss. We only have Zhang Jiawei standing on the opposite side to talk. What about the front side? Everyone is scrambling, with great momentum, but unfortunately, most of them fail to convey the meaning.
Finally, through the audience's speech, the debate between the pros and cons and the summary of their own statements. Fortunately, our four debaters, Gao Zhuoting, were fluent in language and articulate, and won warm applause. As expected, in the end, our opponent won. Among the four best audiences, I unexpectedly won the "excellent audience". I'm so happy!
Through this little debate, I understand the importance of unity. Without the joint efforts of all of us, the fruits of victory may not necessarily belong to us.
In order to welcome the annual creative festival debate in our school, the teacher organized a "preview" for us and selected the best three debaters to represent our class.
"When!" The game has already started. In the first round, the debaters of both sides stated their views. The positive statement is: as a primary school student, it is very important to have the concept of financial management, so primary school students should have pocket money. The opposing view is that pocket money can easily make pupils form bad habits, and pupils should focus on learning. With pocket money, primary school students will think about buying snacks, which will affect their study, so primary school students should not have pocket money.
Followed by a free debate session. When the referee gave the order, the opposing team immediately stood up and said, "Excuse me, my opponent, what if you are thirsty outside but don't have pocket money to buy water?" What will you do if you want to take the bus but have no pocket money? "Without thinking, we directly responded to each other:" I will bring my own boiled water, and I will bring my bus card when I take the bus. I can't live without pocket money. "Just when the other side was arguing, I immediately stood up and hit back at the other side:" Have you ever thought about the pros and cons? "If there is no pocket money, will those bad teenagers go to Internet cafes to play games? Without pocket money, would those students buy three meals? " As soon as I finished, the audience at the scene gave me thunderous applause for my wonderful counterattack, and even the referee nodded frequently.
My heart is full of joy. Just as I was immersed in complacency, the other party stood up and said, "Didn't you buy snacks with pocket money?" The three of us clamored to stand up and help me fight back: "Our parents don't give me pocket money, and we have no money to buy it." The audience burst into laughter, while another debater looked at us dumbfounded. I pursued the victory, stood up and said, "Do you know another debater? According to online statistics, 20% of children with pocket money are used to play games and 60% are used to buy snacks. " The other party was surprised to hear this data. When the other side stood up and prepared to fight back, the time was up.
The last round is the summary session. Both sides summed up their views through a large number of examples and theories, and the teacher also selected three excellent debaters to represent our class in the school finals.
Although the whole game is over, the fierce debate in the process still echoes in my ears. Although it is a pity that I was not chosen as an excellent debater to represent my class in the school competition because of my personal behavior habits, this wonderful debate has been deeply engraved in my mind.
I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books, because there is a heated debate in the classroom. Do you want to know what is going on? In fact, a special debate is going on. ...
The theme of this debate is the eternal topic "Is it beneficial to open books", so every student has made full preparations and decided to give it a try. A war without smoke is about to begin. As soon as the debate started, the classroom exploded. Everyone in the forest is a preemptive strike. He said confidently, "I don't think it is beneficial to open books." Liu Xiang once said that books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools. " Since the book is compared to medicine, it has two functions just like medicine. One is a good medicine, which can cure diseases; One is that poison kills people. What can I say about this? "Lin Jun's words are like a depth charge and thrown into the enemy's heart. The applause thundered. I thought to myself, it's amazing to refute others with what celebrities have said.
Chen Zhengnan stood up again and said plausibly: Gorky once said that "books are the ladder of human progress, and Gorky used to be a small clerk. It is he who has read a lot of books and can become a generation of celebrities. " I thought about it again: but is there any harm in books? My deskmate Huang righteously said: As the British writer Fielding said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may harm you. Can a person study hard when he falls into the dark abyss? " Unexpectedly, Huang's words, like a sharp dagger, deeply penetrated the enemy's weakness. I thought it was a shoo-in
Then Niu Shensen stood up again and said forcefully, "If so, you can ask your parents to help you choose some books, so you won't buy them indiscriminately." His words reduced the number of people who volunteered to join us. "But now the cover of the book is clean, and the contents inside are unhealthy ..."
After 998 1 round, we all know that everyone has different views on books, which is really a unique debate.
Article 5 of the composition debate competition "Now I declare that the debate on whether it is beneficial to open books now begins." When the host gave the order, the whole class immediately burst into warm applause.
"We think it is beneficial to open books, because reading can cultivate temperament, cultivate body and mind, be eloquent and be respected ..." Li Jiayan, the founder, came straight to the point and waited for her words to finish. Our Wan Ruoxi also said methodically: "We don't think that opening books is necessarily beneficial, and our reason is that blindly opening books is not necessarily beneficial. Opening books indiscriminately is always half the effort, and it is not worth the loss! "
When both sides finished their views, the voice of the host sounded again: "Now both sides have finished their views, and then we will enter the four-minute free debate time." At first, no one came forward to argue. With the encouragement of teachers and classmates, finally, Li Jiayan broke the deadlock and began to quote classics: "As the ancients said, it is beneficial to open books. Indeed, extensive reading can make people knowledgeable. Du Fu, an ancient poet, famously said: Reading is like breaking ten thousand volumes, and writing is like being divine. This is undeniable. Du Fu read a lot of books, countless ... "Not to be outdone, our Zhang stood up and retorted:" The writer Zhao Shuli said that reading is like digging a mine. So, it's not easy to learn your knowledge about a good book, but it's easy to read a bad book ... "At the sound of Zhang's voice, a large part of the audience in the class nodded and said yes.
When relatives saw it, almost all of them jumped up from their seats like springs, scrambling to speak, and like birds vying for food, fearing that they would not have their share. Finally, Li Jiayan first said that she was eloquent: "You just said that as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people to evil. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't resonate with readers and go deep into them? " This statement is a bit too perfect, and I am secretly nervous, for fear that one person will lose accidentally. I took Zhang, discussed it, and threw out this passage: "As the ancients said, traveling thousands of miles is not as good as Wan Li Road, and studying is not as good as reading thousands of books. A letter is better than no book! "
Li, who is in the square, seems to have been prepared, and he also moved out a wise saying, "The ancients Liu Xiang also said that books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Haha, this just gave us a chance to fight back, and I laughed myself. We stood up again and retorted: "Since books are medicine, they have two functions: First, good medicine can cure diseases; One is poison that kills people, isn't it? " This sentence can be described as lethal.
Zheng Fang was dumbfounded for a moment, unable to speak. There was thunderous applause in the class, and eight judges nodded in succession. After a while, Zheng Cai said, "As far as the benefits of reading are concerned ..." "We don't think reading is necessarily beneficial, because ..." "The ancients said: ..." The debate became more and more intense, and the audience below sometimes nodded, sometimes applauded, and sometimes whispered and discussed a sentence or two.
"Stop, it's time for the end of the free debate. Now it is the judges who score. " Even if you don't want to, the argument is over. "Which judge voted for it?" No one raised their hands. "Then which judge voted against it?" Eight people raised their hands at the same time. "We won here!" Some of our players couldn't believe it, and even rubbed their eyes and looked at each other because the result was really unexpected.
The debate is over, but my heart is hard to calm for a long time, because this debate has taught me how to read more and be an eloquent person.
;