"People should not be arrogant, but they should not be arrogant." I stood up and answered.
"Do you know what this sentence means? Who said that? Under what circumstances? " This question puzzles me.
"You should take the meaning of this sentence literally. I want to tell you that this sentence was said by Mr. Xu Beihong. You should get to know him well and know the source of this sentence, so that you will understand it more deeply and like it better. " Teacher Zhang said kindly.
I heard it for the first time in primary school: if you like a sentence, you can know its origin and the person who said it, so as to deepen your understanding of this sentence.
Similarly, when reading a book, you can know its author or title and the background of the book, so you can know something about the content of the book.
Do you feel the same way? At the end of reading, I found that the content of the book seems to have nothing to do with the title; Close the book, you can't tell the main content of the book; Someone asks you that you can't express the main idea of the book; Even after reading it, the content has been forgotten. ...
Will you feel lonely after reading it? I always feel this way.
In How to Read, I found the answer.
All kinds of situations occur because we have not been able to locate, chew and digest the good books we want to read or need to read, that is, we have not used analytical reading.
Analytical reading is the second of the four reading levels, which belongs to active reading. Active reading corresponds to passive reading. When reading actively, we will have a clear goal, think with questions, and mobilize all our reading skills to achieve our reading purpose, so that our reading gains will be great. Passive reading is just a glimpse of the book. Without thinking, the income is greatly reduced.
There are four rules in the first stage of analytical reading. Rule one, classify the books you read by reading. The importance of the title of this step is often ignored by us.
Just like teacher Zhang asked me that famous question. The famous writer is very important. The title of the book is also very important, which can provide us with some important information.
When you see the title of Train, what kind of book would you classify it? Theory or practice? If I told you it was a novel, what kind would you classify it? If you pick up a book and read it from beginning to end, I'm sure you'll wonder at the end, why is such a story named train?
I read this book three years ago. Did I read it or did I read it all at once? After reading it, I found that the story didn't seem to match the title, so I looked it up on the Internet myself. After checking, I turned to the book again, only to find that there was an explanation before the text of the book. After seeing the author's introduction on the inside of the book envelope, I can better understand what the story writer in the book wants to convey.
So I suggest that when you study, you should check the reading classification according to the first rule of the first stage of analytical reading. You have to use a book with a cover to understand it. This is a reasoning novel. Then with the help of the explanation of the train in front of the text: 1. Burning car ii. It is used to take the dead who did bad things before their death to hell. And the introduction of the author on the inside of the book envelope, so that you can roughly understand the direction of the content in the book, so as not to see it in a fog.
When reading other books, remember not to ignore the step of analyzing and reading, so as not to miss important information.
Secondly, according to the other three principles of analytical reading, you can see through the skeleton of a book and deepen your understanding.
Do you understand why you sometimes read a lonely book? May we remember the four rules of the first stage of analytical reading and practice them in reading, so as to gain something from reading.