Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - Love without material things is like scattered sand. What do you mean?
Love without material things is like scattered sand. What do you mean?

There is nothing wrong with the literal understanding of this sentence, but most people who say this sentence have great problems. Many girls want their boyfriends or husbands to spend money on her, which can't satisfy their desires. They take this sentence as an example. Between the lines, it is revealed that men don't deserve to fall in love without money, and there is a meaning that "I am poor, but you deserve it". How ignorant people can put this sentence every day.

There is no specific relationship between material and love. In this era, without material, everything may become loose sand. Why do you have to refer to it specifically as love? Even if not, it's between you two. Why do you have to use this sentence to talk about your partner, but never reflect on yourself?

You are poor, and you are scattered when you are alone. It is not love that makes you scattered, but you happen to meet another boy who is not rich either. You don't want to change so hard, but you are eager to fill the loose sand in your heart with his material in the name of love. This is obviously selfish and irresponsible.

Your loose sand has nothing to do with love. What you should do at this time is to make money, instead of criticizing your boyfriend or husband here. If you admit that you worship money, dislike each other or you are poor, you can choose not to talk about it, or go to the rich second generation uncle, but you can't find it, but you have to force a poor boy who loves you like you to satisfy your desires like an old man, or you will say that people don't love you.

It's just what you do or what you think. Love without material things is a piece of cake. You just want to kidnap each other in the name of love and let him contribute selflessly to you. This is just an excuse and a fallacy. But many people regard it as a wise saying to spread it widely. If we have to reflect the rationality of this sentence, it can only come from the context of the bystander, and the person who acts on it between his objects is either stupid or bad.