First, Zhang Taiyan used the "three natures" in the phenomenology of physiognomy as the foundation of his religion establishment and measurement. What is "three natures"? "One day: count the self-nature; Second: according to his self-nature; Three: the circle is true. " [1] First of all, the self-consciousness of the plan is "only portrayed by the consciousness of the plan." If the color is empty, if it is self-contained, if it is inside, if it can be used, if it is different, if it is absent, if it is born, if it is broken, if it comes, if it goes, if it is caused. Without consciousness, there can be no such difference. Although its name is there, its meaning is absolutely nothing "[2]. That is to say, the self-reliance of the plan begins with the distinction between human consciousness and the outside world. Without human consciousness, there would be no such distinction. Judging from the truth of Buddhism, this distinction is only a conceptual distinction, but there is no distinction in the world in essence. Secondly, according to his self-nature, it is made up of the eighth Arya knowledge, the seventh last knowledge and the five senses, such as eyes, ears, nose, tongue and body. ..... The number of knowledge, not as conscious weeks count degrees persistent famous saying. That is to say, according to this knowledge, we can divide them into two parts. Although there is no environment, there is an illusion [3]. This means that he feels and knows all kinds of external things because of the difference between eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, terminal knowledge and Araye knowledge [4], but from the perspective of truth, these different external things are all formed on the basis of certain karma, so they are just some illusions, which are illusory or not. Finally, Yuan Cheng's real self-nature is "made up of reality, truth, and Farr (which is still natural), and it is also made up of Arayer's knowledge" [5]. This means that the self-nature of the circle is composed of reality, truth and farr. It is the ontology of the world. Secondly, Zhang Taiyan quoted the philosophical theories of western philosophers such as Plato, Zhi Nuo, Kant, Fichte and others to analyze them respectively. He thought that the three natures could make up for the shortcomings of these western philosophical theories. Because of the tedious argument, here is only Zhang Taiyan's analysis of Plato's theory of ideas. First of all, Zhang Taiyan quoted Plato's ideal form to demonstrate the reality of the circle. He said: "And Plato's so-called Illyrians are often close to their areas. Buddhists think that what is right for wisdom is true; Plato thought that the understanding of the opposite situation of wisdom and knowledge was a fall, and its proportion was similar. " [6] This is to compare Plato's highest ideal that human reason can achieve to the truth of Buddhism. Although their ultimate goals are different and their understanding of the world ontology is different, they do have the same philosophical thinking when seeking the world ontology. Secondly, Zhang Taiyan believes that Plato's theory of ideas is not perfect. "Although its secret meaning can be solved, the meaning of the text is still impassable" [7]. Therefore, he revised Plato's theory of ideas with Buddhism's self-nature. He said: "Plato can be said to be good at falling in Iraq, but it means that all individuals exist, either falling in Iraq or leaving Iraq." Yidieye is there, but not this is not there, and that individual is both there and there. You can't have both what you have and what you don't have, and you can't have both. " [8] Here, Zhang Taiyan accurately describes the relationship between the conceptual phase and individual things. The conceptual phase is a more real field independent of the things that individuals can feel. Individual things have or imitate the conceptual phase to a certain extent, and only the conceptual phase is the truly determined knowledge object. Based on this accurate grasp, Zhang Taiyan analyzed and criticized: Since Yidiye is real, why should the world not exist because of karma? What kind of karma is there, so that those who have it can reconcile what is not there, thinking that there is and there is not? If the cloud is real, it is outside the non-existence, then the non-existence is also outside the real existence. There is nothing, but it can be opposed to reality. Although it is temporarily called non-existence, it will have to be recognized as existence, and its name is opposite to reality. If the cloud is real, it has nothing to do with it, and the special people can't observe it with clear knowledge, cross the real thing, and see it without it; After seeing what is wrong in this illusion, we can see what is, and even more wrong, and then become the existence and non-existence of this individual. If you are, you will become this individual, and you will see and see each other. If you don't say that you are self-centered, it is not enough to be an individual. Zhang Taiyan asked in this regard, since the concept phase is noumenon, why can't it exist widely in all the world and make the world have a vast and sensible world? And how can we combine ideas with sensible things and distinguish between what is and what is not? If ideas are independent of sensible things, sensible things should also be independent of ideas. Since there is the name "non-existence", which can be opposed to the actual existence (idea), even if it is temporarily called non-existence, it will eventually have to be admitted as existence, so that the name of "non-existence" of sensible things is opposite to the essence. If the reality of individual things is not real at all, it is only because people can't observe the reality with reason, so what they see in the concept reality is not false, and in these individuals' non-existence, they can understand a little and see the reality, so they are intertwined, and then say that these individuals have both the existence and the non-existence. The reason why we can understand that an individual has both existence and non-existence is that the subject and object of cognition are dependent on others. If you don't understand the self-nature, you can't fundamentally understand why individual things are right and wrong. Therefore, Zhang Taiyan advocates the introduction of Buddhism's "self-nature according to others", thinking that this can truly explain the relationship between ideas and individual sensible things and the non-existence of individual sensible things. In addition, Zhang Taiyan also quoted the paradox of Zhi Nuo, one of the representatives of eleatic school in early ancient Greece, and Kant, a German classical philosopher, criticized the practical reason. He pointed out their theoretical shortcomings one by one and advocated using Buddhism's "self-reliance" to make up for the explanation, which showed his thoughts of criticizing western philosophy by quoting Buddhism. Thirdly, Zhang Taiyan realized a new understanding of Buddhism as the only Sect in this criticism, and endowed Buddhism with a new object of criticism, the significance of the times and the transformation of significance, thus proposing to establish a new religion with "self-knowledge as the Sect". He said: the debatable person is still teaching today, but taking self-knowledge as the Sect. What is the knowledge? Truth is only knowing the truth, and the so-called round is also true. And this round is also true, too impulsive, eager to enter, have to rely on him. If you catch his certificate, you will be removed from it. Therefore, the person who is revered today is self-sufficient, not self-sufficient. If he goes with the flow, it is only convenient to follow him. All sentient beings are as true as this, and as aware as this Alaye. Therefore, it is the only way to know the non-local self and the universal beings. If we persist in speaking for ourselves, we can only teach knowledge, that is, we are no different from God and me. With all sentient beings sharing this understanding, I made a big vow to do my best to get rid of all sentient beings, unlimited doom, and do my best in the future. (Not original ~ sorry, ha) Follow-up: I haven't seen the information given by my friends, at least I have learned a lot. However, I would like to ask "what is a virtuous heart". Answer: This is a bit difficult. . . . . . However, after consulting a lot of materials, I believe you can understand ~ Ask: .........................................................................................................................................................