Here's something I'd like to hear from you.
One thing, I'd like to hear your advice.
The failure to hold the parking brake is probably caused by the wheel brake components.
Failure to press the handbrake is most likely due to wheel brake components.
You reach a point in your project where you just want to get things done.
When you are engaged in any project, you will enter a realm: you are bent on completing it.
I have reached the stage where I no longer care.
I have reached the point where I don't care about anything.
We may lose a lot of money.
In our case, we may lose money.
In some cases, this rule does not apply.
In some cases, this rule does not apply.
The company has now introduced a policy that salary increases are linked to work performance.
This company has introduced a policy that wages should be linked to work performance.
Have you ever been in a situation where you know others are right, but you can't agree with them?
Have you ever been in a situation where you know that another person is out of place with you?
More knowledge
First, attributive clauses modify abstract nouns
You've reached the point where drugs can't help you.
You have reached the point where drugs can't treat you.
The crisis has reached the point where the bankruptcy administrator has to be called. The crisis has reached the point where the bankruptcy administrator must be called.
It's time for us to change.
We have reached the point where we must change.
Note: Sometimes a point can also be a specific location:
Let the point where AB intersects CD be called e.
Let the intersection of AB line and CD line be e.
The accident happened at the intersection of A 15 and M 1.
The accident happened at the intersection of A 15 and M 1.
Second, attributive clauses modify abstract nouns
In some cases, the word "mighty" is used as adverb.
In some cases, the word mighty can be used as an adverb.
Today, we will discuss some examples in which English beginners can't use English correctly.
Today, we will discuss the improper use of English by some beginners.
Third, the activities of attributive clauses to modify abstract nouns.
Those successful deaf dancers think that dancing is a more important activity than hearing.
Those successful dancers are deaf. They think dancing is an activity that makes people look better than they sound.
Fourthly, the situation that attributive clauses modify abstract nouns.
He is in a difficult position to judge right from wrong.
He is in a situation where it is difficult to tell right from wrong.
If you risk something important, you will put it in danger and you may lose it.
If you risk something important, you put it in a dangerous situation where you may lose it.
Verb (abbreviation of verb) attributive clause modifies the position of abstract noun
This puts me in a position where I can't accept this job.
This puts me in a position where I can't accept this job.
Sixth, where attributive clauses modify abstract nouns.
She wants a job that can give full play to her management skills.
She wants to find a job where her management skills can be brought into full play.
I don't want a job that is locked in front of my desk all day.
I don't want to find a job where I sit at my desk all day.
Where to make an attributive clause 2 1. She put herself in a dangerous situation, and she is likely to die.
She put herself in danger and might lose her life.
I miss the place where I lived as a child.
I miss the place where I lived as a child.
This is the place where he works.
This is where he works.
Tell me where the accident happened yesterday.
Tell me where the accident happened yesterday.
Using where to make sentences attributive clause 3 attributive clause of where
The antecedent indicates the specific place, acts as an adverbial in the attributive clause (not as subject, predicative and object), and uses where to guide the attributive clause. For example, this is the house where I once lived.
Precedents are abstract places, such as ideas, cases, positions, conditions, activities, situations, work, etc. , and used as an adverbial to guide them.
You've reached the point where drugs can't help you. You have reached the point where drugs can't treat you.
This puts me in a position where rei can't accept the job. This puts me in a position where I can't accept this job.
She wants to find a job that can give full play to her management skills.
The difference between where in attributive clauses and adverbial clauses can be mainly seen from the following three points:
1.where leads the attributive clause, where is a relative adverb, and it is used as an adverbial of place in the clause, preceded by a prefix indicating the place.
Where-guided clause modifies antecedent. For example:
The bookstore where I bought this book is not far from here.
This is the house where I lived two years ago.
We will start from where we left off.
Second, when where leads adverbial clauses, where is a subordinate conjunction, and the clause led by where modifies the predicate verb of the main sentence.
There is no antecedent indicating the location before where. For example:
Wuhan is located at the intersection of the Yangtze River and the Han River.
Make a mark where you have questions or questions.
I found my book where I put it.
Sometimes, where-guided positional adverbial clauses have both abstract conditional meanings and can be placed before the main clause, while where-guided attributive clauses cannot. For example:
Where there is a will, there is a way. Where there is a will, there is a way.
Where there is water, there is life. Where there is water, there is life.
Thirdly, in some cases, where-guided attributive clauses can be transformed into where-guided locative adverbial clauses. For example:
A tall building was built where there used to be a garden.
Desert. A tall building was built, where it used to be a building.
A tall building was built in what used to be a desert.
Bambo grows best in warm and rainy places.
Warm and rainy places are most suitable for bamboo growth.
Use where to make a sentence attributive clause 4 Where to guide the attributive clause, and the antecedent does not necessarily indicate the place.
1. We will discuss some situations in which English beginners can't use this language well.
C. Why? Where is D.
He drives so fast that he is in a dangerous situation-he is likely to lose control of the car.
C. Why? Where is D.
Choose where for both questions, but in neither case, the situation is a place. How to understand it?
On the premise that the antecedent is not a noun indicating the place, how to judge whether to use the relative adverb where to guide the attributive clause is a high-frequency test site. That is to say, the antecedent referred to by the relative adverb where is not just a noun indicating place.
When you use Where to guide the attributive clause, the antecedent doesn't always indicate the place. According to the usual understanding, when you use where to guide an attributive clause, its antecedent is a noun indicating the place, but the fact is not as simple as we thought. In many cases, the antecedent referred to by where does not indicate the place.
Please look at the following example:
1. Remember, the best relationship is that you love each other more than you need each other.
Remember, the deepest emotional relationship is that love exceeds need.
Comments: The attributive clause guided by where here modifies the antecedent, that is, the relationship (here refers to the relationship). Relationship is not a place noun, but is guided by where here, which means "under such an emotional relationship" From the structure of the attributive clause, the attributive clause does not lack a subject and an object, and the leading word where acts as an adverbial in the clause.
2. Deception is the most important thing when the vital interests are high and the chances of getting attention are low. In this case, fraud is most likely to occur: the benefits are significant and the possibility of fraud being discovered is small.
Comments: The antecedent in the sentence is situations, which means "situation, situation", and the leading word is where, which means "in this case". There is no shortage of subject or object in the attributive clause here, and where acts as an adverbial in the clause.
Until human beings realize that the population should be reduced to the level that the earth can provide a comfortable life for all.
Will have to accept more "unnatural food". Unless people can realize that reducing the population to the point where the earth can provide enough food for all, people will have to accept more "artificial food".
Comments: the antecedent here is point, which means "to some extent, a certain situation", and the leading word where refers to point, which means "to this extent". The attributive clause here is not short of subject and object, and where also acts as an adverbial in the clause.
From the above three examples, we can find the following two points: first, even if the antecedent is not a word indicating place, the attributive clause can be guided by the relative adverb where; Secondly, in the above three examples, where refers to relationship, situation and point respectively, which means "in relationship", "in situation" and "to a certain extent" respectively. Although these words are not nouns representing places, they mean "a certain point or state" in clauses. We can interpret these nouns as "nouns with abstract locative meaning", and these words can also be guided by the relative adverb where.
How to judge whether to use Where to guide the attributive clause when the antecedent does not indicate the location? When the antecedent is not a noun indicating the place, how to judge whether to use where to guide the attributive clause? From the examples given above, we can see that nouns with abstract locative meanings can be guided by the relative adverb where, and in the notes of each example, it is repeatedly emphasized that "the attributive clause does not lack subject and object, and where acts as an adverbial in the clause".
Therefore, we can boldly carry out extended induction and put forward the judgment method of "where is used to guide the attributive clause when the antecedent does not indicate the place". First, judge the structure of the attributive clause: the attributive clause should lack adverbials instead of subjects and objects. Secondly, observe antecedents: antecedents are any nouns except time nouns (when will be used in this example) and reason nouns (why will be used in this example). The second condition holds because adverbial components in attributive clauses are generally guided by three leading words: when, where and why.
In order to understand this judgment method more deeply, please look at the following example:
English is a language with a fixed word order, and each phrase has a fixed position. English is a language with a fixed word order, which is characterized by the fixed position of each phrase.
Comments: First of all, let's judge the structure of the attributive clause "every phrase has a fixed position": this clause does not lack a subject and an object, but it lacks an adverbial. Secondly, let's look at antecedents: antecedents are fixed word order languages, which are neither time nor reason. So where is used here to refer to the antecedent, which means "in a language with a fixed word order"
In college, Plato teaches students by using debates, in which two or more people argue about different views. In universities, Plato's teaching method is to organize debates, and two or more students hold their own opinions.
Comments: First of all, let's judge the sentence structure of the attributive clause "Two or more people have different ideas about an argument": the clause does not lack subject and object, but adverbial. Secondly, let's look at antecedents: antecedents are debates, neither time nouns nor cause nouns. Therefore, where is used here to guide the attributive clause, which means "in dispute"
6. In any case, enthusiasm is not for everyone. No one likes false enthusiasm when people are eager to get excited about small things. However, enthusiasm is not suitable for everyone, and no one likes the kind of fake enthusiasm that pretends to be excited about trivial things.
Comments: First of all, we judge the sentence structure of the attributive clause "one should pretend to be excited even at small things": this clause does not lack subject and object, but adverbial. Secondly, let's look at antecedents: antecedents are false enthusiasm, neither time nouns nor cause nouns. Therefore, where is used here to guide the attributive clause, which means "in a state of false enthusiasm"
Through the comments on the above three examples, I believe that readers have been able to master how to judge whether to use where to guide the attributive clause when the antecedent does not indicate the position. In addition, we need to carefully understand the meaning when where refers to the antecedent in the example, that is, "in a language" and "in a state". These meanings are similar to the examples given in the first section, and they all have abstract local meanings. Therefore, we should keep in mind in future studies and exams:
Where-guided attributive clauses, antecedents are not necessarily nouns representing places, because antecedents may also be nouns that abstract the meaning of places. From this, we summarize as follows:
Where antecedent stands for "place" or any noun with "abstract place meaning".