Three elements of an argumentative essay: 1. Argument 2. Argument 3. Demonstration

1. Article examples

"Persistence is Victory"

People want to succeed in their careers or studies. Edison invented the battery and was awarded the title of "King of Inventions".

Dickens and Edison achieved their final victory by perseverance. Perseverance enabled Dickens to leave many excellent works to people and add many fine works to the treasure house of world literature; persistence enabled Edison to overcome many difficulties and make indelible contributions to the progress of mankind. It can be seen that persistence can make people achieve career and academic success.

Those losers often fail to persevere at the last moment and give up their efforts, missing out on success. I once remembered that a German chemist seemed to have discovered a new element when he was extracting iodine from seawater. However, faced with the tedious refining and experiments, he retreated. When another chemist spent a year and countless experiments, he finally added a new member to the element family - "bromine" and became famous throughout the ages. The German chemist could only watch silently as the other chemist was immersed in the joy of victory. middle. Of these two chemists, one persisted and succeeded; the other did not persist and failed. It can be seen that persistence is the last obstacle to victory. In the darkest moment, that is, the moment when light is about to come, the more we are in such a moment, the more we need to persevere. Because persistence is victory. (Chang Tianqi)

(The scientist who passed Cl into the immersion solution and missed the opportunity to discover bromine was the German chemist Liebig, and the one who discovered bromine was the French scientist Barrard) 1. The argument is that the author The views, opinions, and opinions on a certain issue or a certain type of event put forward in an article must be correct, clear, and targeted, and are generally expressed in the title of the article, or the first sentence, or the end. For example, the argument of the article "Persistence is Victory" is that if a person wants to achieve academic or career success, persistence is an important condition.

2. Arguments

Arguments are evidence that proves that the argument is correct. To prove that an argument is correct, first of all, the evidence must feel real, credible, and able to fully prove the argument. Secondly, the arguments must be typical and have the effect of “one is equivalent to ten”. Third, the arguments should be novel, and try to find some fresh arguments that can give people new feelings and revelations.

For example, the positive and negative examples of Dickens, Edison and German chemists cited in the article "Persistence is Victory" are all arguments used to prove the argument, which are both typical and surprising. People feel authentic and trustworthy.

3. Argument process

Argument is the process of using arguments to prove arguments. The purpose of argumentation is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments and arguments.

Edit three elements of this paragraph - Introduction 2

There are three elements in an argumentative essay: argument, argument, and demonstration.

Write an opinion based on the topic and then elaborate on it. The most important thing is to have the ability to persuade. All three elements are indispensable. Read the detailed introduction below carefully, and you can try to write more in the future. This way Only by writing can you make progress. In addition, you should also memorize some famous aphorisms and celebrity examples for better application in your composition.

(1) Argument

(1) The meaning of argument: Argument is the point of view to be discussed and expounded in the article, and it is the opinion and proposition that the author wants to express. When reading an argumentative essay, the first thing is to find, extract and understand the argument of the article.

(2) There are several arguments: the argument of an article can be one or more than one. If there is more than one argument, the central argument needs to be made clear. These arguments (except for the central argument) can be parallel or progressive, but they should all obey the central argument of the full text.

(3) Position of the argument: The argument of the article can be arranged at the beginning, the middle or the end of the article, and sometimes it is the title. That is, it can be placed anywhere in the article. But more often than not, it is at the beginning of the article, and the same is true for paragraph arguments. When there are similar sentences at the beginning and end, the one at the beginning is the argument, and the one at the end is the echo argument.

(4) Presentation method of arguments: Some arguments are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we only need to find them; some are not expressed directly in clear sentences. It requires readers to extract and summarize it themselves.

(5) When presenting and establishing arguments, attention should be paid to:

①Correctness: The persuasiveness of the argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, which in turn depends on the author’s position , whether the viewpoint, attitude, and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect or even absurd, no matter how hard you argue, it will not convince people. Therefore, correct arguments are the minimum requirement for an argumentative essay.

②Clarity: What you agree with and what you oppose should be very clear, not ambiguous or vague.

③Novelty: The argument should be as novel and profound as possible, beyond the opinions of others. It should not repeat other people’s clichés, nor be irrelevant and general talk. It should be as unique and novel as possible.

(2) Arguments

(1) What are arguments: Arguments are the materials and basis to prove the argument.

(2) Types of arguments:

①Factual materials As factual materials for arguments, they can be a. specific examples, b. Summarized facts, c. Statistics,

② Theoretical materials. Theoretical materials used as arguments can be a. Classic works and wise sayings of predecessors, b. Folk proverbs and sayings, C. Scientific axioms, laws, etc.

(3) Requirements for using arguments: 1. Confirmation. We must choose the hard and typical facts. When citing theoretical materials that have been tested in practice as arguments, attention must be paid to the precise meaning of the cited theory itself. ②Typicality. The examples cited should be broadly representative and represent the common characteristics and general nature of this type of thing. ③Unity of arguments and arguments. Arguments are meant to prove arguments, so the two should be closely linked and consistent.

(3) Argument

(1) What is argument: Argument is the process of using arguments to prove an argument. The argument of the argumentative essay is to solve the problem of "what to prove", the argument is to solve the problem of "what to prove", and the argument is to solve the problem of "how to make the argument". The purpose of argumentation is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments and arguments.

(2) Types of argument: Argumentative argumentation is generally divided into two types: argumentation and refutation.

① Argument is a method of argumentation that uses sufficient arguments to positively prove the correctness of the author's own argument; ② Refutation is a method of argumentation that uses powerful arguments to refute other people's wrong arguments. Both argumentation and refutation are a kind of proof. One is to prove that it is correct from the positive side, and the other is to prove that it is wrong from the negative side. They can use essentially the same argumentation methods.

(3) Basic argumentation methods: including three major categories and five types: induction, illustration, deduction, metaphor, and comparison.

①Induction method. Inductive argument is a method of argumentation from the specific to the general. It uses many individual examples or sub-arguments, and then summarizes their unique characteristics to draw a general conclusion. The induction method can first give examples and then draw conclusions, or it can first put forward conclusions and then prove them with examples. The former is what we usually call the induction method, and the latter is what we call the illustration method. The illustration method is an argumentation method that uses individual and typical concrete examples to prove the argument.

②Deductive method. Deductive argument is a method of argumentation from general to specific. It proceeds from general principles to derive conclusions about individual cases, and the connection between the premises and the conclusion is necessary. There are many forms of deduction such as syllogism, hypothetical reasoning, disjunctive reasoning, etc., but the most important one is syllogism. A syllogism consists of three parts: major premise, minor premise and conclusion. For example, the major premise "all metals can conduct electricity", the minor premise "iron is a metal", and the conclusion "so iron can conduct electricity".

③Comparative method. Comparative argument is a method of argumentation from individual to individual. It is usually divided into two categories, one is the analogy method and the other is the contrast method. Analogy is a method of comparing different things that have the same or similar properties and characteristics in some aspects to draw conclusions. The contrast method is a method of proving arguments through comparisons between different things whose properties and characteristics are opposite or antagonistic in some aspects.

(4) Argumentation methods are also called example argumentation, comparative argumentation, quotation argumentation, and metaphorical argumentation.

(5) Refutation methods: There are three methods of refutation, namely ①refuting arguments, ②refuting arguments, and ③refuting arguments. Since an argumentative essay is organically composed of three parts: argument, argument, and demonstration, refuting the argument or argument also denies the argument, which has the same effect as directly refuting the argument. A refutation paper can be combined with several refutation methods to enhance the power and persuasiveness of the refutation.

① Refuting arguments, that is, directly refuting the one-sidedness, falsehood or fallacy of the opponent's argument itself. This is the most commonly used method in refutation. ② Refuting arguments, that is, revealing the errors in the other party's arguments in order to overthrow the other party's arguments; because wrong arguments must lead to wrong arguments. ③Rebuttal argument, that is, expose the opponent's logical errors in the argumentation process, such as the contradiction between the major premise, minor premise and conclusion, the contradiction between the opponent's arguments, the contradiction between the argument and the evidence, etc.

Edit this paragraph three elements of argumentative essay - Introduction 3

Details the three elements of argumentative essay: argument, argument, demonstration

Argument

Definition: The author’s opinions and opinions on the issues discussed (events, phenomena, characters, concepts, etc.)

Form: A complete judgment sentence with a clear stance on the topic

1. Argumentative papers generally have only one central argument. Some argumentative papers also propose several sub-arguments around the central argument. The sub-arguments are used to supplement or prove the central argument. As long as the relationship between these arguments is studied, the main and subordinate points can be distinguished.

2． How to find the central argument. An argument should be a clear judgment, a complete statement of the author's opinion, and should be in the form of a complete sentence. The positions can be divided into: article title, article beginning, article end, article middle, and some require readers to summarize. The general format is (…) is (…) (But in the exam, it is best to make the argument clear, because the marking teacher does not have much time to read, so it is best to make it clear to them at a glance.

(In order to prevent yourself from unnecessary deductions)

Note: rhetorical questions and metaphors cannot be used as arguments

Arguments

It is the material to support the argument. It is the reason and basis used by the author to prove the argument

1. Factual evidence: Facts play a very obvious role in argumentative essays. Analyze the facts, see the truth, and test whether they are logically consistent with the article points. (Representative examples, conclusive data, reliable historical facts, etc.). Factual arguments include examples and data.

2． Reasonable arguments: The theories used as arguments are always familiar to readers or generally recognized by society. They are the result of abstraction and generalization of a large number of facts. Theoretical arguments include famous aphorisms, proverbs and mottos as well as the author's reasoning analysis.

Argument

The process and method of using arguments to prove arguments

The relationship between arguments and sub-arguments: proving and being proved

Discussion The arguments and arguments in the text are organized through arguments. Argument is the process and method of using arguments to prove arguments. It is the logical relationship between arguments and arguments. The argument is to solve "what needs to be proved", the argument is to solve "what to prove", and the argument is to solve "how to prove".

The argument methods include the following:

1. Argument with examples (factual argument): List conclusive, sufficient, representative examples to prove the argument; (Function: Concretely and forcefully demonstrate the point of view (main argument or sub-argument) to enhance the persuasiveness of the article)

2. Proof of argument: Use incisive insights from Marxist-Leninist classics, famous sayings of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign celebrities, and recognized theorems and formulas to prove arguments; (Function: effectively demonstrate the point of view (main argument or sub-argument) and enhance the authority of the article

3. Comparative argument: compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument in the comparison; (Function: highlight and comprehensively demonstrate the point of view (main argument or sub-argument) , impressive)

4. Metaphorical argument: Using familiar things as metaphors to prove an argument. (Function: vividly demonstrate the point of view (main argument or sub-argument), making the article easy to understand, easy to understand and accept) In addition, in the refutation, the method of "using the spear of the son and attacking the shield of the son" is often used Methods of criticism and "reductio ad absurdum". It is often used comprehensively in most argumentative papers.

5. Citation argument: Citation argument is more complicated, which is related to the specific citation materials, such as citing famous quotes, aphorisms, authoritative data, anecdotes of famous people, jokes and anecdotes. (Function: For specific analysis, quoting celebrity quotes, aphorisms, and authoritative data can enhance the persuasiveness and authority of the argument; quoting celebrity anecdotes and anecdotes can enhance the interest of the argument and attract readers to read on.)

Argumentation method:

Argumentation method:

In terms of argumentation method, argumentative essays are generally divided into two types: argumentation and refutation.

(1) Argument: Argument is an argumentative method that positively explains the author's opinions and propositions on a certain event or issue.

(2) Refutation: Refutation is to discuss certain events and issues, exposing and refuting wrong and reactionary opinions

1. Argument: Argument is an argumentative method that positively explains the author's opinions and propositions on a certain event or issue. When expressing your attitude, you should pay attention to the following three points:

(1) These opinions and opinions must be the result of careful thinking or certain practice, and must be your own unique and correct understanding and insights. Or a proposition that can actually solve a practical problem. It is necessary to make readers feel new ideas, increase their knowledge, and improve their understanding of things.

(2) The argument must be based on the issues discussed and the central argument. What kind of question is asked at the beginning, and the ending should be attributed to this question. During the argumentation process, you cannot go too far away from the topic, use it arbitrarily, or change the topic arbitrarily. If there are several sub-arguments, each sub-argument must be related to and subordinate to the central argument. All arguments must revolve around the central thesis. This way the reader can clearly understand the sub-points and the central argument. The argumentative essay is very logical, and the argument must stick to the center and be consistent from beginning to end.

(3) "Establishment" is often based on "destruction". In the process of establishing an argument, you need to mention some erroneous opinions and claims, deny and refute them to enhance your persuasiveness and prevent readers from misunderstanding your point of view.

2． Refuting: Refuting is to express opinions on certain events and issues, exposing and refuting wrong and reactionary opinions or propositions.

(1) Refute the argument. Refutation is mainly to refute arguments, because the fundamental purpose of argument is to elaborate on opinions and express opinions. If we cannot agree with the other party's opinions and opinions, we must use various methods to refute and deny this opinion or opinion, and point out its absurdity or false. A counterargument is a direct refutation of the opponent's argument.

One of the ways to refute an argument is to point out the error of a certain argument directly, directly refute it with solid and irrefutable facts, or conduct a thorough theoretical analysis and dissection to directly point out the error. .

Another way to refute an argument is by reductio ad absurdum.

Reductio ad absurdum is to take a certain argument as the premise and make reasonable extensions according to the laws of logic, but the conclusion drawn is absurd. Since the conclusion drawn cannot be established, the argument derived from it cannot be established. In writing, we can use reductio ad absurdum to reveal the "irregularity" of some vague understandings that are plausible, which can have a good effect in clarifying understandings.

Rebuttal arguments can also be counter-evidence, that is, the author does not directly point out the fallacy of the opponent's argument, but establishes a new argument that is diametrically opposed to the opponent's argument, and establishes this new argument through sufficient argumentation, so The opposite argument is self-refuting.

When using the method of proof by contradiction, it should be noted that the argument refuted and the argument proved by oneself should be mutually exclusive and incompatible. Only in this way can we meet the requirements of the law of contradiction in logic and achieve the purpose of affirming one thing and negating the other.

(2) Refute arguments. Counterarguments are a way of refuting the other party's arguments at the bottom of the barrel. In the process of argumentation, arguments are the pillars on which the argument relies. If the argument cannot be established, the argument will lose support and collapse without attack.

(3) Refute the argument. Refuting an argument is to deny the argument put forward by the other party by exposing loopholes in the illogical relationship between the arguments and arguments of the other party in the argument process. To conduct such an argument, you need to calmly analyze the other party's remarks, discover the contradictions in the logical reasoning, and then expose them forcefully.

(4) points: logical argument, metaphorical argument and factual argument.

Edit this paragraph Three elements of argumentative essay - Introduction 4 1. Three elements of argumentative essay

1. Argument: It is the soul and commander of an article. Any article has only one central argument, and generally it can have sub-arguments. The argument should be correct, clear, and summarized, and should be a complete judgment sentence. Never be ambiguous.

There are generally four positions for arguments:

①Title

②Beginning

③Middle of the article

④End

2. Arguments

The materials used to prove arguments include factual arguments and theoretical arguments.

When choosing factual arguments, please note:

① It must be typical. Both ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign are acceptable. It is something that most people know, at least it has been in newspapers and on TV.

②It is best to be novel.

③The expression of the arguments should be accurate, the narrative should be summarized, and it only needs to be able to prove the argument.

Please note the following when choosing theoretical arguments:

① It can be famous quotes, aphorisms, sayings, proverbs, theorems, formulas, etc., but it cannot be selected from novels such as Paul and the like. .

② It must be accurate and cannot be tampered with or distorted.

③It is necessarily related to the argument and can prove the argument.

3． Argument: The process of using arguments to prove an argument.

①Basic types of argument: argumentation and refutation. To establish an argument, discuss it from the positive side, and to refute it from the negative side. When we write argumentative essays, we generally focus on establishing arguments.

②Basic structural level of argument: syllogism structure.

Ask a problem (what is it) → analyze the problem (why) → solve the problem (what to do)

That is: introduction and conclusion of this thesis

Common Argument structure:

a. Total fraction structure b. Comparative structure c. Hierarchical structure d. Parallel structure

③Commonly used argumentation methods:

< p>a. Illustration method (also called argumentation by examples): Use typical examples as arguments to prove arguments. As the saying goes, facts speak louder than words.

b. The citation method (also called logical argument), in addition to quoting the theoretical arguments introduced above, can also quote some famous lines from classical poetry. On the one hand, it can strengthen the power of the argument. On the other hand, it It can also enrich the content of the article and enhance the literary nature of the argumentative essay.

c. Comparative argument (also called positive and negative argument): This method can enhance the clarity of the argument and make the reader clear what the author agrees with and what he opposes.

d. Metaphorical argument (also called metaphorical argument) enhances the image, literature and persuasiveness of the work’s argument.

e. Argument by analogy

2. Logical expression.

The language of argumentative essays must be accurate, clear, rigorous, and targeted.

There should be very clear logical relationships between paragraphs, such as total score, comparison, layering, juxtaposition, etc. Use transitional statements to highlight this relationship. Such as: "there is", "there is", "although, but", "of course", "it is true", "therefore", etc.

3. Argumentative writing requires more philosophical thinking.

Especially argumentative essays are meant to reward good and punish evil, to persuade and guide people, and therefore must be persuasive and have a correct value orientation.

Take political classes seriously, and often read rational articles, famous quotes, etc., which will improve our ideological quality, improve our cognitive ability, and be of great benefit to our writing, especially argumentative writing. .

It will enrich the content of the article, deepen the idea of ??the article, and improve the persuasiveness.

Edit this paragraph Argumentative essay structure 1. Basic structure

1. The basic structure is to ask questions (introduction), analyze problems (thesis) and solve problems (conclusion).

2. Classification

2. If analyzed from the logical relationship of the article content, the specific structural forms of argumentative essays can be divided into two categories:

a. Vertical style: a layer-by-layer in-depth argumentation structure

Example 1. The "going deep layer by layer" method first puts forward the argument, then demonstrates it step by step, gradually unfolds the truth, and finally summarizes it.

Example 2. "Pros and cons argument" style: first put forward the argument, first demonstrate it from the negative aspect, and then further discuss it from the positive aspect.

b. Horizontal format: Parallel development of argumentation structure

For example:

There is a formula of "overall - sub-themes - general conclusion", which is presented first The argument is then elaborated from several aspects, and finally summarized;

There is a "general conclusion-part argument" style, which first puts forward the argument and then demonstrates it from several aspects.

There is a "partial conclusion - general conclusion" formula. What is to be discussed is always analyzed from several aspects, and then a comprehensive conclusion is drawn.

In short, to analyze the structure of an argumentative essay, you must first understand the internal connections between the levels of the middle paragraphs, and also pay attention to the transitional paragraphs, transitional sentences and transitional words in the article that serve as a link between the previous and the following.

Edit common test question types in this paragraph

1. Argument (what to prove) The argument should be a complete expression of the author's opinion, in form a complete, concise and clear sentence. Viewed from the full text, it must be able to unify the entire text. The expression form is often a judgment sentence expressing affirmation or negation, which is a clear statement of attitude.

A. Grasp the argument of the article. There is only one central argument (to lead the sub-arguments) ⑴Clearly: There can be N sub-arguments (to supplement and prove the central argument)

⑵Method ①Find from the position: such as title, opening, middle, and end. ②Analyze the arguments of the article. (Can be used to test whether the expected argument is appropriate) ③Excerpt method (only sub-arguments, but no central argument)

B. Analyze how arguments are presented: ① Present the facts and reason and then conclude the points; ② Get straight to the point and put forward the central argument; ③ Put forward a topic based on the phenomena existing in life, and summarize the central argument through analysis and discussion; ④ Narrate an experience of the author , summarize the central argument; ⑤The author raises questions from the story, then analyzes and infers step by step, and finally draws a conclusion and puts forward the central argument.

2. Arguments (what to prove) ⑴Types of arguments: ①Factual arguments (summarize after giving examples, summarize the arguments and closely follow the arguments); ②Philosophical arguments (analyze famous quotations).

⑵The arguments must be true, reliable, and typical (discipline, country, ancient and modern, etc.). ⑶Sequence arrangement (corresponding to the arguments); ⑷Judge whether the arguments can prove the arguments; ⑸Supplementary arguments (must be able to prove the arguments).

3. Argument (how to prove)

⑴ Argument method (must be four words) ① Demonstration with examples (exemplification method) Factual argument description ② Logical argument (citation method and reasoning) Argument with logical arguments

③ Comparative argument (it can also be an argument by example and logical argument) ④ Metaphorical argument Metaphor is an analogy in expository writing and a metaphor in prose.

⑵ Analyze the argumentation process: ① How the argument is put forward; ② How the argument is proved (what principles and facts are used, and whether there are positive and negative analytical reasoning); ③ Connect the structure of the full text, Is there a summary?

⑶ Completeness of the argument (Answer: Make the argument more comprehensive and complete to avoid misunderstandings)

⑷ Analyze the role of the argument: prove the argument of this paragraph.

4. The structure of an argumentative essay ⑴General form: ①Introduction (raising a question)--②Thesis (analyzing the problem)--③Conclusion (solving the problem).

⑵ Type: ①Parallel type ②Total fraction type ③Total fraction type ④Minimal type ⑤Progressive type.

6. Reading of refuting papers

⑴What is the wrong view that the author wants to refute? ⑵ How did the author criticize, and what principles and arguments did he use? ⑶ From this, what is the correct view established by the author?

7. Common test points

①. Test points for arguments in argumentative essays: First, distinguish the issue discussed and the author’s views on this issue (that is, distinguish the topic and argument). Second, pay attention to the position of the argument in the article:

(1) At the beginning of the article, this is the so-called clear and straightforward writing method.

(2) At the end of the article, it is the so-called summary of the whole text, highlighting the topic at the end of the article, and revealing the central writing method. This kind of writing is mostly used when clearly expressing arguments. So, in a word, therefore, all in all, in the final analysis and other summarizing words.

Third, distinguish the central argument and sub-argument: The sub-argument is usually located at the beginning of the paragraph or has iconic words: first, second, third, etc.

Fourth, pay attention to the content of the argument Form of presentation: Sometimes the title is the central argument. An argumentative essay has only one central argument.

Fifth, use arguments to deduce arguments: Arguments serve to prove arguments. By analyzing arguments, you can see what they prove, affirm, and support. This is the argument.

②. Argumentative essay test points: Arguments are the basis for the argument, which are generally factual arguments and rational arguments. 1. Use facts as arguments. The examples must be true and reliable, have typical significance, be able to reveal the essence of things and have a certain logical connection with the argument. In argumentative essays, the description of the examples cited should be concise and to the point, highlighting the parts directly related to the argument. When clarifying arguments, you must not only know where in the article the factual arguments are used, but also be able to summarize the factual arguments. When summarizing, to be accurate, you must grasp the essential characteristics of the argument based on the argument, and then express it in precise language. 2. Speeches used as arguments should have a certain degree of authority. When quoted directly, they should be copied from the original text and verified with authenticity. They should not be quoted out of context; when quoted indirectly, the original meaning should not be misinterpreted.

③. Structure and hierarchical test points of argumentative essays: Structures include: parallel structure, contrastive structure, hierarchical structure, and total score structure.

The basic form of this test point: How does the author prove his argument?

Edit this learning method

If you are new to learning how to operate these argumentative essays,

you can start by imitating them. Take an article as an example. The most typical one is Wu Han's "Talking about Integrity":

1. Introduction part: The argument is put forward at the beginning: We Chinese people have backbone.

Then, use Mencius’ words to explain the argument: “Wealth and honor cannot be lascivious, poverty and lowliness cannot be moved, and power cannot be bent.”

2. Part of this thesis: Three examples are used to prove the argument: Wen Tianxiang's wealth cannot be fornicated; the poor cannot move away from their poverty if they do not eat what they have received; and Wen Yiduo's majesty cannot be surrendered.

3． Conclusion: Explain the backbone of today’s proletariat and issue a call to action.

There is a transition between the three parts: between the introduction and the main article, there are "many touching and touching deeds of our ancestors, as well as his positive educational significance." The following three examples are introduced. narration. There is a transition between the main thesis and the conclusion: "Although these words of Mencius were spoken more than two thousand years ago, they still have positive significance until now."

Between the first and second examples, there is a transition between "another story" and "another example". These transitional sentences make the article coherent.

The three parts answer three questions respectively: the introduction part answers the question "what"; the thesis part answers the question "why (with backbone)"; the conclusion part answers "what should we do" problem.

The three examples are all summarized, and each example is followed by a few brief remarks. These discussions clarify the meaning of the event, tie the case tightly to the argument, and are the link between the argument and the argument. Otherwise, it will just talk about the matter, and the argument and the argument will be out of touch.

Argumentative essays are a style of writing that uses argument as the main form of expression. It elucidates the understanding and knowledge of things by listing factual materials and using logical reasoning, and expresses views and attitudes towards issues. People from all walks of life need to read and write in this style regularly in order to receive or express ideas.

An argumentative essay usually contains three major elements: argument, argument, and demonstration. The argument is the ideological point of view expounded by the argumentative essay; the argument is the basis used to prove the argument in the article; the argument is the revelation of the logical relationship between the argument and the argument.

The close relationship between these three forms the main body of an argumentative essay