I am on the side of the opposition. Recently, I read Li Nan's simple, clear and vivid book "The Design of Reading Guide", and there are also some words, such as sticking your nose into your throat, but don't spit it out.
I'm not going to criticize middle school students' popular books. Recently, they like to watch horror ghost stories, and you are shocked just by the cover-the bloody head on the gray picture. I wonder if these books will become the future Strange Tales from a Lonely Studio. I just asked them how they felt after watching it. "Fun and excitement" are the evaluation words they often use. What did you get? They shook their heads.
Teacher Li means that we don't have to criticize students for reading books, let alone interfere, because Hegel said that "existence is truth".
I don't quite understand the meaning of this sentence I always feel that this sentence is more or less absolute. A search on the Internet mostly translates into "existence is reasonable". Although there is only one word difference between "reason" and "reason", they are also thousands of miles away. Besides, just because Hegel is a philosopher, we can't accept his famous words completely. If this sentence is true, is it reasonable for YanTaitai to let "I" steal money from adults, spread rumors that "I" has stolen money from adults, and show a child pornographic pictures? Is it reasonable for feudal autocratic society to exist for thousands of years? Is it reasonable to be overthrown? Moreover, if this sentence is used to prove that many middle school students think that many famous books recommended by experts are "boring" and "boring", is it also reasonable?
Mr. Wen Rumin put it well: "We should respect students' Chinese life", especially "we should give them due respect and care for their Chinese life". So I chose a class of Grade 789 to conduct a sampling survey. Of the 50 students in the ninth grade, 50 said they were in a fog. Apart from his childhood experience, that is, several articles selected into junior high school textbooks, no one else knows what Mr. Lu Xun is going to say. A student with poor grades said that he could understand cats, dogs and mice. He thinks Cat, Dog and Mouse is a fairy tale, which tells us why cats and dogs become enemies. Most of the 52 students in Class One, Grade Eight read it all at once, and no one remembered all the contents. All the students said that they couldn't understand Mr Hu's obscure language. The seventh-grade students are even worse. They are reading this book, and they even question that there are too many sick sentences in this book. I asked a few Chinese teachers casually, and they all thought that Mr. Lu Xun's iron personality was worthy of the title of soul of china, but "Morning Flowers and Evening Picking Up" was really not suitable for seventh-grade children to read.
? However, since we don't respect students' choices and give them some articles that our experts think are profound, it is no wonder that students say that they are "three afraid of Zhou Shuren".
? Teacher Wen Rumin said that we should respect students' preferences, so we can't respect students' preferences without principles. I think we can examine what they like as an experienced person and whether it is appropriate as reading materials. You can't just let it go because of "respect", you must agree with what they like. For example, they like to play games, watch interesting and knowledgeable crayons, and even indulge in unsightly yellow cartoons and even obscene videos. Should we all say "existence is reasonable" without any intervention or guidance?
We must give guidance.
Looking back, is "Morning Flowers and Evening Picks" suitable for seventh-grade students? I quite agree with Mr. Tang Jianxin's suggestion: no, I agree with Mr. Tang's reason: the language of Mr. Lu Xun's works is "obscure", and the article "Cat, Dog and Mouse", as Mr. Tang analyzed, is a blow. Our teacher still needs information to understand Mr. Wang, not to mention a seventh-grade child.
Teacher Li Nan insisted that this book is suitable for seventh grade children, and he also designed an introduction. He thought that students' interest in reading could be stimulated by clarifying the background of the times: this period was the passionate wedding of Lu Xun and Xu Guangping. Does Mr. Li think that using Mr. Lu Xun's love (knowing that Mr. Lu Xun is a teacher-student love) can arouse students' strong interest? Teacher Li went on to say that some of his works are bitter satires on people after the "March 18th" tragedy, while others are full of warm memories because of love. What I want to say is that when the "March 18th" tragedy happened, Mr. Lu Xun criticized the government for creating the tragedy and showed strong indignation. Secondly, it is ironic to satirize those royal scholars who are waving flags and shouting for the government: it is wrong for students to just study, which will cause social unrest. The mood here is bitter ridicule, not gentle criticism.
It should be said that the truth of education should be "teaching should be based on learning". For example, you bring walnuts and say to your baby, "Eat it, it's good, it can replenish your brain!" " Things are good and true, but it depends on whether he can accept them. Teacher Li said that this difficult book can be solved by three words: "shallow, clear and lively". I don't think it's that simple.
"Shallow" Teacher Tang said: Lu Xun's lengthy quotations, trivial parenthesis, quotations from ancient and modern times, Chinese and foreign countries, and spontaneous use of words like schoolbags all make the seventh-grade students who have just risen from the sixth grade feel at a loss and even feel afraid. Few people have read the whole book. Even after reading it, they still remember several articles in the book. Of course, "cats, dogs and mice" are remembered, but they think that, that is to say, I misunderstood Mr. Lu Xun's profound thoughts. Don't interpret them easily, otherwise Mr. Lu Xun will be furious. Xiang Zhuang's sword dance is intended to be Pei Gong. You can't see his intention to dance the sword, but you admire: Xiang Zhuang, your swordsmanship is wonderful! What is not superficial? Either don't read it, and wait until your understanding ability and experience reach a certain level, which is better than our fragmented reading now!
? The second word: Qing. Clear, definite clues. Teacher Li said that the whole book is arranged according to the world of childlike innocence, the life choices of youth and the memories of teachers and friends. There is no uniform standard for this classification, so the analysis is not accurate enough.
? The third word: alive. I don't quite agree with teacher Li's supplement to Shuo Wen Jie Zi. Of course, this shows that Mr. Li has a profound knowledge of ancient Chinese, but it still depends on his study. He knows what the word "Guangdong" means. What does it mean? Over the years, the "iron wishful" smile ... "The old man in" Shou "put" Reading aloud "into" Reading aloud "and it became a classic, which let us know that reading can be so forgetful, and also let us know that the charming conductor Li Keyong has an irreparable mistake. How does this help to understand the old man Shou Jason Wu? Off topic, I don't think students will fall in love with Flowers in the Morning because of this "living" treatment.
We recommend works to children because they can get spiritual food from works and let them learn the power of growth. In recent years, I have been recommending a series of tender mystery novel by Malaysian writer Xu Youbin to students, such as October, Seven Days and Blue Fence. You can teach students in a certain way. Everyone likes reading and gains something.
Of course, I don't dislike Mr. Lu Xun's articles. On the contrary, I have great respect for Mr. Wang. Many times, I can't help but think of Mr. Wang's words, his characters, his cold eyes, his fiery heart, his thoughts on children's education, his thoughts on dark rooms, and his famous saying, "There is no road on the ground, so there are many people walking, so it becomes a road." These characters are deeply remembered in my heart. I just don't think some of his articles are suitable for seventh grade students. Of course, there are no problems with some articles, such as "From Baicao Garden to San Tan Yin Yue", "A Chang Shan Hai Jing" and "Kite", but not necessarily. So, you must finish reading his flowers sooner or later.
When we choose famous books, what kind of knowledge can we let children accumulate and improve their cultural quality according to their age characteristics and existing cultural level? It can make them walk into the text, accept information, form a correct outlook on life and world, and improve their spiritual level, but they don't have to choose Mr. Lu Xun's obscure works.