Communicate more, communicate more.

Give up prejudice and accept even counter-common sense knowledge to impact your cognition.

Read more books and think like a god.

When you are exposed to new things and have comprehensive and systematic knowledge, you can look at a problem from different angles.

Let's analyze it in detail ~

Not self-centered, everything follows objective laws.

I remember, in the history books of high school, I once quoted a sentence published by Guangming Daily:

Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth

The main method of testing truth is practice. Any book knowledge theory comes from practice and should be constantly tested by practice. As long as we follow the facts and learn new methods and knowledge by action, we can look at things objectively.

Method sharing

Understand how and why

Knowing how to do it and why to do it, the learning process and methods can get the desired results.

For example, in the experiment of chemistry class, after understanding the theoretical knowledge, we can discuss and learn the rationality, scientificity and perfection of the experiment by watching the experimental video (if possible, we can get on the horse and do the experiment ourselves), so as to spread our own thinking and achieve the purpose of thinking.

Do what you can't do, but ask yourself.

If you are unsuccessful in doing things, encounter setbacks and difficulties, or get along badly with others, you should reflect on yourself and find the reasons from yourself. But what we usually do often runs counter to the saints. When there is a problem, it is not complaining, but introspection.

For example, if you preach to Comrade Jianguo, you should reflect on yourself!

American bestsellers, in popular language, intuitively explain the basic problems, viewpoints, methods and skills of critical thinking, correct reasoning and reasonable argumentation.

It tells how to think correctly and write clearly, to the rules of effective argumentation, reasonable deduction and inductive reasoning, and then to detailed moral, legal and aesthetic argumentation.

Here are some wrong ways of thinking:

Appeal to personal/generational fallacy: to refute a position or argument by criticizing its source.

Hasty generalization: too much trust in the conclusions drawn from small samples.

Group thinking: let loyalty to a certain group interfere with the judgment of the problem.

Diversion: Answer irrelevant questions and avoid the focus of the question. Wishful thinking: let your own preferences judge and refuse to explore the truth.

A person knows more, knows more, is natural, objective and calm.