Say and translate words:
Moreover, according to Ming's point of view, a noun can be interpreted in three ways: explaining words by writing, explaining words by writing, and saying only one of them.
Aquatic, for example, has both words and explanations for the lotus growing in water. In other words, because it is a lotus growing in water, it can be called aquatic, so there is an explanation; In rhetoric, especially in Tibetan poetics, when it comes to "aquatic", you know it is a lotus, so there is also a saying. This is a situation in which both words are interpreted and spoken. Talking without explanation is like a lotus growing on the ground. Although it can be called aquatic, it does not have enough explanatory power because it grows in water. Frogs that grow in water can be said to be aquatic, but this is only an explanation, because when it comes to "aquatic", no one knows that it refers to frogs. So, it only has enough words, not enough words.
Minimal: when these brutal and ruthless laws are divided again and again until they can no longer be divided, they are collectively called minimal in pawn. In other words, a grain of dust has 49 tiny amounts. As small as 7 times that of iron dust, and so on, water dust, rabbit hair dust, wool dust, elephant hair dust, sunshine dust, scorpion dust and lice dust increased by 7 times until knuckles.
Species: refers to the earth, fire, water and wind.
Mass production: refers to the touch of color, sound and fragrance. There are five kinds of voices, and only four kinds of voices.
Eat Mi Pai, heresy, liberal.
Viewpoint: Dust must contact each other and gather together to combine. If they don't touch, the coarse consolidation method can't be combined, so all the dust must exist one by one.
In fact, because they think that dust always exists, it is impossible for dust to stick or not, and this view can easily be covered up in this way.
The so-called random dust, that is, the smallest, can no longer be divided. However, according to your opinion, when dust is bonded, there will be dust in different directions, such as dust in the east and dust in the west, so there will be contact and non-contact parts, so the so-called dust has no place. Why? Non-fractional dust has now become fractional dust, because some of it has come into contact with eastern dust and western dust and has become fractional dust, which is obviously contrary to your holistic view.
The other side argued that there was no non-stick part.
In this case, the dust in the east and the dust in the west, countless dust and this dust together, will lead to the rough method will never be established, because the volume of this dust will never expand, and finally, Mount Sumi will become dust. There is a sect's point of view in Neidao: pillars and the like are all made of dust, and there is no gap between dust and dust. They are gathered together by the power of the wind, so they will not be scattered. They think they have both the ability to be separated and the ability to accumulate. Why can't more dust be inserted into the gap between dust and dust? They said: this is the law of a famous saying. Although there is a lot of space in the middle, there will be no other dust.
Broken: If these dust particles are separated from each other, then the smallest light and shade will have a chance to enter that position. For example, there are many gaps in columns, so there should be bright dust and dark dust in the gaps of columns. In other words, the bright dust we see is also composed of many dust particles. When the sun shines on the earth, although there are many gaps invisible to the naked eye, there should actually be many gaps, and letting dark dust enter these gaps will definitely lead to the wrong light and shade.
Since there is really a gap between dust, there is no doubt that there will be other dust in this gap.
Because there is a gap between the promised dust, there will be other dust inserted between the dust and the dust. In the end, all the worlds of the whole 3,000 worlds and the world of all beings can be accommodated between the two dusts, which is a big mistake, so this statement is unreasonable. According to sects such as the Confucian classics, contact is contact, but it does not stick together.