Fudan University has put its opinions on handling three cases of academic plagiarism on its website, which has aroused social concern, because many schools hope to solve this problem privately or secretly on the website. Then the self-exposure behavior of Fudan University can be said to have caused great controversy. As you can see, this series of events is also related to whether the academic fraud problem that everyone is concerned about recently is becoming more and more serious in universities, especially in China University, so whether this integrity problem is questioned by everyone is also related.

Because of this academic violation, someone reported it, and he reported it anonymously. What about such an event? After the Academic Standardization Committee has made a clear investigation and put forward corresponding handling opinions, then because it is anonymous, according to the rules, there should be a reply to the reporter. Then if this reporter is a real name, then of course you can reply. Then if he is anonymous, there is no way to reply. Therefore, on Fudan campus network, it is such an announcement, which is actually a reply to whistleblowers, especially anonymous whistleblowers.