There is only one winner, and the others are losers. If you want to win the final victory, it is a shame to win.

Just like in school, the first exam is often regarded as a shame and people with lower rankings will be happy.

In fact, when I first saw this sentence, I felt illogical. This inspiring chicken soup is enough to smooth the relationship and spread it. The second place is the strongest among all the people who canceled the first place. This is the first loser. But the number one loser and the number one loser seem to be completely different. The loser who ranks first is the loser who fails the least. The first loser is the worst loser among losers. Is it completely different? Changing this sentence to doubt is not misleading, it is a serious misleading. The second is the most powerful loser.

if this sentence is changed to "the second place is the best loser" without misleading suspicion, will it still have the current communication effect?

It's really boring to play this word game for communication

Am I serious?