Speaking of the anime "The Patriarch of the Demonic Way", everyone will know about it. This anime has been very popular since it was aired. When the first episode of the anime was aired, it reached a record of two days. It has 300 million views, but usually such a very popular work will be questioned a lot, and someone will always come out to make irresponsible remarks.

First of all, I think it is inappropriate to say plagiarism in literary works. When many authors create their own works, they will be more or less influenced by the works of their predecessors. The related works they have read before will be deeply influenced by them. It is deeply implanted in the author's mind. When creating his own works, he will subconsciously use some of the things he has seen before in his own works.

I think this kind of transformation cannot be regarded as plagiarism. Just like after we read famous works such as The Romance of the Three Kingdoms or Dream of Red Mansions, we often quote famous quotes from them in our compositions, or there are touching words in them. When we write articles later, we often explain these principles in our own words and become the central idea of ??our articles. If this is also considered plagiarism, then how many people's works have been plagiarized since ancient times? Where is he coming? Just like painting.

In the early stages of learning, we often copy the paintings of our predecessors. If this can be said to be plagiarism, then every great painter will be slandered as a plagiarist. In the field of literature, we cannot use Ordinary thinking is used to judge whether the author has plagiarized. This transfer of thinking can only be said to be a re-creation of literature, not plagiarism. The so-called popular right and wrong.

Same as many popular works before. Mo Dao was also exposed to a plagiarism scandal, but is this really true? Can plagiarism in literary works really be identified from some words? I think the answer is no.

When reading the works of predecessors, there must be some sentences or some truths in them that will resonate with you. These things will gradually penetrate deep into your heart. When you are creating, you will use them subconsciously. This subconscious move comes from your own accumulation of literature and cannot be said to be plagiarism.