Introduction: The school organizes children to watch a free open-air movie "Confucius". Parents are required to accompany the viewing. The following is my review of watching the Confucius movie. Everyone is welcome to read and learn from it! Thoughts after watching Confucius's movie (1)

The Spring and Autumn Period was divided and various countries were at war. The era of Confucius was interspersed in such troubled times. He and his disciples traveled around the world for more than ten years. What has never given up is etiquette, justice, benevolence and harmony.

I went to watch this movie with not very high expectations. For more than two hours, I watched it very quietly with the audience in the venue. As Hu Mei said, ""Confucius" is a film that will definitely make you remember a lot of storylines." But what Confucius brought to me is not just as simple as stories and plots. What he left behind was an image and a spirit. Together with the disciples behind him, most of them were probably weak scholars. But what you feel must be thousands of troops like the sea waves, leading an era.

Confucius, played by Chow Yun-fat, is the main line and soul of the film. No matter what situation he is in, his firm and calm eyes and the charm of his eloquent words of etiquette and justice from beginning to end are like the reincarnation of Confucius.

Yan Hui, Zi Lu, and Ran Qiu have different personalities, but they love their teachers as much as their lives, and follow etiquette and benevolent spirit as their lives. Zilu helped defend the country, and Ranqiu returned to Lu to serve. The most touching person is Yan Hui. Yan Hui is Confucius's favorite disciple. He looks weak but is resourceful and determined. The scene where he died was criticized negatively by many people: it was pretentious, fake, and funny. But I was moved. I believe that when Yan Hui repeatedly dived into the water to save the bamboo slips regardless of his life, many viewers also shed tears. I also believe that when Confucius kept holding the dead Yan Hui and refused The scene of letting go shocked thousands of people.

Zhou Xun performed the charm of Nanzi. She is a born good actor, and the characters she plays are lifelike to the core. The role of Nanzi is not dispensable. The important role is that it exists and you feel it is dispensable. Once it does not exist, you will feel that a huge piece is missing. Confucius was actually amazed and attracted by Nanzi's beauty, but he finally cut off the emotion that was about to be sublimated into ambiguity with the sentence "But some people just love virtue as much as lust." Nanzi allows the world to see that Confucius is not a god, but also an ordinary person. Although Nanzi appears briefly and has only a few plots, he cleverly reflects the character's choice between nature and belief. It is really an interesting point of view. How can it be dispensable?

It is not difficult to predict that "Confucius" will be the same, leaving different impressions in different people's hearts and planting different seeds in different people's hearts.

But it is undeniable that Hu Mei was successful. He captured the spirit of Confucius and the crux of that era, and his performance was not as obscure and boring as reading a history book. The overall feeling of this film is good, and neither the storyline nor the presentation techniques are watered down.

The media’s concerns now appear to be safe. “Confucius” will not be threatened by the box office because of Avatar. China's history is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, Confucius' etiquette, righteousness and benevolence are highly respected, and Hu Mei's strength has also been witnessed.

It has been a few days since the release of "The Son". The audience's reaction is divided into two groups. One group, led by experts and scholars, supports it, while ordinary moviegoers are enthusiastic about watching it. They feel that the film is mediocre. Wuqi, I saw Fa Ge kneeling down and crying, and thought it would be very good, but after watching it, I found that I had been deceived by Fa Ge. This result surprised me but also made me think it was reasonable.

It is an accident because the movie "Confucius" is similar to the lectures of Dan and Yi Zhongtian, both of which want to pass on the knowledge of traditional culture to everyone in a relaxed form. But what Yu Dan and Yi Zhongtian received was enthusiastic support from ordinary audiences and waves of contempt from academic circles. "Confucius" with the same nature has received the opposite treatment. It makes sense because I am also a semi-professional. When I watched this movie, I shed tears in several places. I can say that I was indeed moved by this movie.

First, Confucius was in trouble with Chen Cai. The film devised a plot in which master and apprentice share a bowl of horse meat soup. This plot is a common plot in movies and is not very touching. But when I saw the master and the disciples singing and dancing in the cold wind, I suddenly thought of the sentence "A gentleman is poor, but a villain is poor." I also thought of Confucius's evaluation of Yan Hui: "A basket of food , a ladle of drink, in a back alley, people can't bear their worries, and they won't change their happiness when they return." Thinking of this, I suddenly realized that the plot of the horse meat soup and the master-disciple dance came from this sentence.

The second part is that Zi Lu died in a tassel. There was a small flaw in the background narration in the film, which is not consistent with the records in "Historical Records". What the movie says is that Zi Lu died to protect Wei Chu Gong when he was away on business. In fact, before Zi Lu arrived, Wei Chu Gong had already been exiled to the State of Lu, and Zi Lu went there. But I didn't care about this small flaw, because this scene in the movie evoked my sadness for Zilu's death. Confucius once said: "Kill oneself to achieve benevolence, and seek life to harm benevolence." A gentleman's death is righteous. This comment is enough to comfort Zilu's soul and allow us to see the staunch side of Confucian scholars.

The third point is that Yan Hui died young. The ancient books do not clearly explain the cause of Yan Hui's death, but only say that he died young. Therefore, the movie takes advantage of this historical gap and finds a cause of death for Yan Hui, who died of freezing in the glacier while trying to rescue the sage's bamboo book. In the movie, after Yan Hui died, Confucius hugged his body tightly. I thought that the famous sentence "Heaven is mourning! Heaven is mourning!" should appear at this time, but it did not. Confucius always remained the same. He didn't say a word, just sitting there blankly, as if begging for help, as if thinking. This scene reminds me of the sentence in "The Book of Songs: Shuili" "Those who know me say that I am worried, and those who don't know me say that I want nothing." (Mao's poems say that "Mi Li" is a poem about the decline of Min Zong Zhou, but three poems say it is a mourning poem.) Confucius even loved Yan Hui more than his son, because his son could only pass on the blood, but Yan Hui could pass on his. Avenue. In the film, Yan Hui loves Confucius' great way more than his own life. Modern people may not understand why a person would fight for a few bundles of bamboo slips. People who are majoring in literature can deeply feel how difficult it is to pass on culture. Sometimes it depends on a few bundles of bamboo slips to survive. As soon as Yan Hui died, Confucius felt that Heaven was going to mourn him. But Confucius also said a famous saying: "Hear the Tao in the morning and die in the evening." This sentence is actually somewhat contrary to the spirit of his preaching to the world. Is it really true that "one has to hear the Tao in the morning and die in the evening"? In fact, in Confucius' view, it should be "there is no rest in life". A gentleman preaches the Tao and never stops dying. Thoughts after watching the Confucius movie (2)

After watching "Confucius", I only remember one sentence: Seek benevolence and get benevolence, so why complain. Perhaps I might add a sentence: Although I haven’t been able to arrive, my heart is longing for it. Just the belief of seeking within yourself is to seek things from yourself instead of looking from outside to others.

Perhaps, only by doing nothing can we do everything, but doing nothing is not impossible. Knowing that it is useless is not of great use. Why care about the result instead of the process, fruitlessness instead of success? There is an effect only if there is a cause, and there is no effect without a cause. The cause is more important than the effect, isn't it? Only when there is point A can we reach point B. Where is the end point without a starting point? How can we die without life? Just seeking results is proof, having causes without results is courage, and having results without causes is absurd. If you want to have results, you have to endure the hardships of supporting the value of the results.

Perhaps, the straight line between two points is not the shortest. Our will and conscience tell us that we are free to choose and responsible, but our daily experience in the external world is governed by the law of cause and effect. In life, we know clearly that "every cause must have an effect." Do our lives have to obey the law of cause and effect in the end? We used to talk about "saving the country through curves" because straight lines are direct and bloody, and represent revolution rather than reform. If understood in this way, can it be said that the curve is the shortest between two points? When we encounter mountains and rivers, we build bridges, pave roads, and even dig tunnels. From an economic perspective, this is not the most economical. The road always follows the terrain. If you build bridges and dig roads, you are not beautifying nature, but destroying it. If we want to reach the top of the mountain, can we also build bridges and dig pits? Therefore, Zhan Tianyou's "herringbone" railway is a great innovation. All great innovations cannot be placed above the cost of others or nature.

Confucius knew that he could not do anything but did it, but he was fearless because his thoughts could be passed down through the ages. Its usefulness as the source of Confucianism will not be discussed here. Perhaps in today's utilitarian society, there is a cause but no effect, it is not mainstream, and it is really stupid. Therefore, today's shortest thinking concept has become the mainstream, so successful learning has become mainstream. Everyone wants to have a car, a house, a beautiful woman, and marry a rich man. Some people say that rich people only become rich when they have money. Learning mathematics, physics and chemistry is not as good as being a dad. If you have money, you can live in heaven. The difference between heaven and hell is whether you have money or not. It is no longer the difference between good people and bad people. .

Nowadays, society likes to establish heroes most, so Confucius can only be regarded as a saint. Galileo said: A country in need of heroes is unfortunate. So what is most lacking today are saints, not heroes. Confucius knew what could not be done and did it. In fact, the responsibility given by the times is also the role that conscience should play. Today in China, what we are talking about is power, money and relationships, so the mission of the times must be the opposite. How many people can clearly understand the mission entrusted to us by the times?

Sometimes we talk about personal greatness, but in fact history does not make a single person immortal. Although Confucius knew what was impossible and did it, he could not interrupt the cycle of history. History always moves forward in a curve, just like genes also move in a spiral. If an individual wants to interrupt the cyclical progress of history in a straight line, then certain individual instances, deeds or events will also interrupt the cycle of our daily lives. Whenever men pursue their aims, like tilling a land that would produce nothing without their labor, it is interrupted by forcing the free-flowing wind to lift their sails over the rolling waves. It is purposeless and can only rotate within itself. Therefore, it is said in the film that no one can understand Master’s thoughts. Therefore, when we think deeply about the nature of history, the historical destiny of countries and their ups and downs in the sense of a historical process, we can never place our trust in individuals and ignore that the historical process must be cyclical.

All of us are born into this world and the world is continually renewed through birth. Perhaps this is my biggest thought when reading "Confucius". History cannot be borne by individual people. Since the concept of "cultural power" has been proposed, is it okay to return to Confucianism? Change the current situation of people without people and government without government.

Now that Confucius finally returned to Lu to give lectures, we can also reflect on today’s education. From the perspective of educational function, its goal is not to introduce young people into the world, but only into a limited part of the world. Education must be accompanied by teaching. Education without learning is empty and it is very easy to fall into moral and emotional preaching. However, teaching can be easily done without education. Even if a person lives to learn, he may not necessarily become an educated person. people. All of these issues are details that must be left to the consideration of experts and school boards.

In fact, the essence of education is that we have to decide whether our love for the country is enough for us to take responsibility for the country and whether to save it from destruction, because if there are not new, young faces constantly Join and rebuild it, its destruction is inevitable. Therefore, education is the foundation of a country and is not a joke. The strategy of building a strong country is all about talent strategy, rather than political, economic, and military strategy. But it is not unrelated, it is just a matter of importance.

At the same time, education also requires the government to decide whether the government loves children enough not to exclude them from the system and whether to let them make their own decisions, that is, not to take away education from them. Take advantage of their opportunities to innovate and create things we never could have foreseen, and prepare in advance for their mission to rebuild a different world. Perhaps this is the difference between China's abnormal education and Western education methods.