Feudal autocracy refers to the feudal system. Its autocrat is not necessarily a monarch. The autocrat of monarchy is a monarch, but it is not necessarily an autocratic rule under the feudal system. Both are It is a system in which the power of the country is concentrated in the hands of one person or a few people.

"Feudal autocracy" and "monarchy" have similarities and differences. The same thing lies in the meaning of "authoritarianism". "Despotism" means "arbitrary". Specialized, independent; controlled, decisive. In other words, they are all regimes ruled by one-man dictatorship. Therefore, "authoritarian system" refers to all political systems of personal dictatorship. Whether it is slave society, feudal society, or even fascist rule in modern history, it can be called "authoritarian rule."

The difference lies in the previous attributive: (1) "Feudal autocracy" specifically refers to the personal dictatorship in feudal society, whether it is an emperor, king, concubine, minister, or like some cities in the late Middle Ages in Western Europe* The rule of the dictators of the Republic of France (such as the Medici family of the Republic of Florence, Italy) was a "feudal autocracy." (2) "Monarchy" specifically refers to the absolutist rule of people with the title of monarch (emperor, king, grand duke, etc.), no matter what society it is in, from the slave society of the "kings of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties in our country" "The emperors after the Qin Dynasty, the emperors of the ancient Roman Empire, the Russian czars, and the Japanese emperors before the end of World War II were all ruled by "autocratic monarchy".

：)