Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - What did Delserre understand? (German problem)
What did Delserre understand? (German problem)
Landlord, your reference translation version is too poor

This is a sentence in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.

It is noted that "bliebe" in "mithin übrig bliebe" and "Best ü nde" and "An hinüHinge" in the above article are all Konjunktiv II, indicating that "mithin übrig bliebe, Wenman von Allen subjektiv n be dingung en der anschauung der selben abstract "is still a part of the clause led by the opening" was ",and it is in a parallel structure with the previous" fü rsich selbst bestü nde, or der den dingen als objektiveness be boring an Hinge ". It shows that "Mithin ü brigbliebe, Wenman von Allen Subjektive n Be Dingung en der Anschauung Derselben Abstrahiert" is still denied by "nicht" at the beginning of the original sentence. Therefore, what we want to translate is this sentence:

When Allen was asked this question, he said, Now is not the time.

The dictionary has the following explanation:

jmd。 This is your birthday.

Is there anyone who doesn't know where he is? ssigen

Ignore, ignore

The philosopher Rudolf isler explained the "abstraction" used by Kant as follows:

Abstract concept. How are you? When "he is not here", it is not "he is not here". I said, "Dad? There is no relationship between people.

It shows that Kant really uses "von Etvas abstraction" to mean "not considering".

Therefore, derselben is not the object of abstrahieren, but after consulting Demonstrativpronomen in hilker Dreier's Lehr-und ü bungsbuch der Deutschen Gramatik, I found that derselben can only be written with the third negation, the second negation and the second plural.

Personally, derselben refers to die Zeit, which is a negative usage in the second case, meaning "time", while "Allen subjective n bedingung en der anschauung Derselben" means "all subjective conditions of time intuitively". If it means "die dingen", "best boring" and "bedingungen", it doesn't make sense. This is my understanding of the whole sentence:

Time is not a thing of its own existence, nor does it belong to the objective provisions of things, so if all subjective conditions are not considered intuitively, there will be no time.

This sentence of Kant appeared in the chapters of transcendental sensibility and time in Critique of Pure Reason. From the paragraph meaning, "derselben" should also refer to time.

In this section, there is another sentence behind this sentence:

How are we? Don't say: everything is the product of the times. Although all works of art are abstract, their characteristics are the product of the times. NDE· guy? rt。

Here, Delserre should also refer to time.

I am a high school student, not a philosophy student. In order to answer your question, I have learned a lot myself.