After reading "Round Justice" written by Luo Xiang, the order is: legal person is enthusiastic about writing. This book covers many cases that have happened in recent years. Teacher Luo Xiang wrote this book from the case itself, from the trial result, or from the humanity (moral thinking) caused by the case.
If you are familiar with his video content, you will find that most of the contents of this book are said by him in videos or interviews, so I read it quickly at first, even a little dismissive, until there was a "staircase case", which suddenly made me understand some starting points of Luo Xiang's writing this book.
The case of "taking the stairs" is one of the few cases in which Luo Xiang conducted professional legal logic analysis. That paragraph is not easy to read because it is full of "French-speaking people". In an instant, I understood that he wrote a book not to popularize the law, but to popularize the value (which may be inaccurate).
In A Round Justice, Luo Xiang quoted a lot of famous sayings or stories from Chinese and Western philosophers, which led to his self-awareness and the ideas or values he wanted to promote. So this book will make people feel sincere to read, but once the "concentration" is too high, it will make people want to abandon the book and run away.
Teachers always seem to have a "strange" sense of mission, which can probably be summarized as introducing their higher values to others, hoping that the other party can be moved or infected more or less.
This is not to belittle teachers, because another name for this "strange" sense of mission is "feelings", which can be found in many beloved teachers who are called good teachers. It is this "strange" sense of mission that drives something and unconsciously affects people who have come into contact with it. Some people will call it light, and then walk into one road, while others will disagree and take another road.
The second feeling after reading the book is that people's thoughts are limited. In fact, I realized this a long time ago. Famous artists have accumulated a lot for decades, and in the end they may only have a little "thin hair" that really belongs to them. The closer you get to a teacher's research, the more you will find that many teachers only have one or two core views, and then build their own knowledge garden around this core. Sometimes they lament that these gardens are like besieged cities, and sometimes they feel that it is these gardens that constitute the beautiful scenery of this land of knowledge.
What impressed me more was that he mentioned Rousseau. Teacher Luo Xiang said that we should love certain people, and love should be paid. Love without giving is actually hypocritical. Just like Rousseau, he has always loved human beings with compassion, but he sent his children to an orphanage because he was too busy loving human beings and didn't love specific people at all.
Yes, many people have this kind of compassion, and even I am moved to tears. Of course, I can't avoid it myself. But in fact, I am selfish and have never loved a specific person. Because loving a person is troublesome and needs to be paid, I hate this kind of trouble, so naturally I won't love a specific person, so they won't feel the same for other people's experiences. When a sentence of verbal violence attacks others, they will not feel how painful this lethality will be. Maybe they can only understand if they feel it for themselves one day.
However, even if I do, I don't believe they can change much. After all, the book also said that the lesson that mankind has learned from history is that mankind has never learned from it.