The information about the fifth paradigm thinking is as follows:
The concept of "paradigm" was first put forward by thomas kuhn, a famous American philosopher, in 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolution, which refers to the theoretical basis and practical norms on which conventional science operates.
Kuhn pointed out that in a certain period of scientific development, there is always a dominant paradigm. When the "anomalies" that cannot be explained by the dominant paradigm accumulate to a certain extent, the old paradigm can no longer be used to explain. The scientific community will seek a more inclusive new paradigm, which can not only explain the arguments of the old paradigm, but also explain the arguments that the old paradigm cannot explain. At this time, a scientific revolution will take place.
On the basis of paradigm and scientific community, Kuhn put forward the growth mode of scientific knowledge: pre-discipline (no paradigm)-conventional science (establishing paradigm)-scientific revolution (paradigm shaking)-new conventional science (establishing new paradigm).
In the pre-discipline period, there were differences of opinion among scientists, so there was no universally accepted paradigm. As a result of the competition and choice between different paradigms, a paradigm is supported by most scientists, forming a paradigm recognized by the scientific community, thus entering the period of conventional science.
In the period of conventional science, the main task of scientific community is to engage in doubt solving activities under the guidance of paradigm, and promote the development of science through doubt solving activities. "Conventional science is a puzzle." In the process of dispelling doubts, some new problems and new things gradually appeared, which shook the original paradigm and triggered a scientific revolution to establish a new paradigm.
As a result of the revolution, a new scientific community with a new paradigm replaced the old scientific community with an old paradigm. The emergence of the new paradigm does not mean that the new paradigm is closer to the truth, but the ability to solve problems has been enhanced.