I think this should be due to meeting a close friend, or meeting someone with a particularly open mind. In addition, the painting itself is a painting left over from the Southern Song Dynasty, and history has also plated it for him. A layer of gold.

And the point is not the writer. He painted the old man fishing but not the water. The point is that someone understood his painting and thought it was worth a thousand pieces of gold. This is the key to his becoming a famous painting through the ages.

Because if you take it in my hand and look at it, I will think it is pretty good-looking at most. But in my case, it completely lacks the artistic value of appreciation. Only those who truly understand it understand its value.

In fact, I also feel that every time I evaluate historical paintings, there are some magical special effects, and only some people can really appreciate them in the end. The most interesting thing to me is that he said that the blank space has a very profound artistic conception, and he said something unflattering, but I didn't see it.

Okay, I admit that I do not have the ability to appreciate art. I don’t exclude him from becoming a famous painting through the ages, but I really don’t like people who always like to use artistic conception to speak. Painting is inherently subjective and receptive. It is normal for everyone to have different opinions.

If it were me, look back at that painting. Don't look at the inscription, just look at the painting. I think it was just a little old man squatting on a field of ice and snow, poking around with a stick.

In the minds of those who understand it, it is a famous painting through the ages; in the minds of those who do not understand it, it is just a piece of waste paper. So there is no need to explore why it has become a famous painting through the ages. Some things are good but you can’t tell why they are good, you just feel that they are good.