Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - Cao: Young people would rather deliver takeout than work in a factory. Why?
Cao: Young people would rather deliver takeout than work in a factory. Why?
Cao once said that today's young people would rather take delivery and be security guards than engage in manufacturing. In the long run, what about the manufacturing industry, which is the foundation of the country?

Hearing this, Cao revealed the seriousness of the current problem. Nowadays, young people would rather deliver takeout than work in a factory. What is the reason?

You know, decades ago, it was an extravagant hope for migrant workers to work in better factories, and some even had to ask someone to find a relationship to get in. Because the job is stable, I still have food and shelter. At that time, many migrant workers flocked to big cities such as Beishangguang to work, and the most choice was to work in factories.

But the last thing young people want to do now is to work in a factory. They would rather choose to deliver food, be an e-commerce company or even be an anchor. Even if they don't have a job, they stay at home and don't want to go to work in the factory. Why is this happening?

It is not so much that young people give up manufacturing that manufacturing drives them away. We can see that in the rapid development of market economy in these decades, no matter products, marketing, management mode or employment environment, everyone is changing with each passing day.

Let's look back at the manufacturing industry. Everyone's products have been innovated and their technology has been upgraded, but the management model still stayed decades ago. Treat young people today in the same way. Will they buy it?

First, because of the young people now, their concept of choosing a job has undergone fundamental changes; Second, because the current employment environment is not the same, young people have more choices.

Some time ago, the labor shortage in Guangdong's manufacturing industry once again showed that it is reasonable for the manufacturing industry not to recruit workers if it does not change its management mode, employment environment and welfare treatment. Even if there is more labor force, it will not solve the labor shortage in manufacturing industry.

At present, there are three major problems in the manufacturing industry, each of which is an insurmountable gap for migrant workers.

The working environment in manufacturing industry is very boring. Workers have to face the rumble of machines and rigid assembly lines every day. One stop is a whole day, and the work content is extremely boring and repetitive. Imagine how such a colorful young man can stand this environment. Many people left within a week.

Guo Taiming of Foxconn replaced assembly line workers with robots many years ago, on the one hand, to save more labor costs, and on the other hand, because it is difficult to retain people in this boring job in the future, which will cause unstable factors for enterprises.

Therefore, at present, our manufacturing bosses should not only think about saving costs and making money, but also think about how to create a good working environment and atmosphere for their employees. This is the most important thing.

Nowadays, many manufacturing enterprises still make money by manufacturing, not by brands. In this way, the company's profits are not high, and employees' wages are bound to be low.

In order to recruit employees, some enterprises pay 5-6 thousand yuan a month in job advertisements, but the actual salary is only 3-4 thousand yuan, including all kinds of overtime expenses.

In some manufacturing enterprises, due to rigid and inefficient management, the management always deducts punishment or delays the payment of wages. In the current employment environment, these will make migrant workers flinch and choose another job.

Therefore, at present, our manufacturing bosses should not only want to be made in China, but also become a brand in China, creating profits for employees, rather than exploiting employees' profits.

Third, there is limited room for growth.

The daily work of manufacturing enterprises is repetitive and streamlined, and employees cannot get better growth opportunities. Even if an employee has worked in a certain position for ten or eight years, he will still be a little white in the workplace after coming out, and he will have to start all over again in other units.

This kind of work that can be seen at a glance must be restless, impatient and unwilling to do it.

Secondly, today's young people don't want to look at the boss's face, let alone deal with complicated interpersonal relationships. If the leader says something unpleasant, he may pack up and leave. Where will he be subjected to all kinds of harshness in this kind of work?

Therefore, our manufacturing bosses must upgrade their industries and technologies, give simple tasks to machines, and give employees more opportunities for growth.

In fact, imprisoning the growth of employees means imprisoning the growth of their own enterprises and letting them finally withdraw from the stage of history.

Cao said that young people would rather send food than engage in manufacturing. Is it the fault of young people or these manufacturing industries? what do you reckon ? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.