2. "Without an independent judiciary, there can be no real judicial independence ..." Famous legal motto.
Article 3 of the United Nations Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary (hereinafter referred to as the Basic Principles) stipulates that "the judiciary has jurisdiction over all issues of a judicial nature and has absolute power to decide whether the matters submitted to it fall within its legal jurisdiction". Article 4 stipulates: "No inappropriate or unfounded interference shall be made in the judicial process, and no judicial judgment made by the court shall be revised".
4. Article 26, paragraph 1 of the German Judges Law clearly stipulates: "A judge only accepts job supervision within the scope that does not affect his independence." The duty supervision power is limited to criticizing the specific behavior of judges, and asking or urging judges to change their behavior in the future. "The power of supervision should not try to determine the specific working methods of judges in a way that affects their freedom of trial", and the power of supervision "only involves general criticism".
5. Professor Steven roux Bate pointed out in the article "Judicial Restriction and Judicial Independence" that it is obvious that if a judge abuses his power, undermines his dignity, is biased or judges without trial, neglects his duty and ignores the law, it will hardly pose any threat to his independence. However, in some cases, punishing the judge may endanger the independence of the trial, and the most important threat is to sanction the judge according to the content of his judgment. Especially when judges apply the law to difficult cases in good faith, but the judgments they make are controversial or not to the public's taste, or even wrong, sanctions or possible sanctions against judges will inevitably lead judges to become timid and cautious, because worries and doubts make them prefer safe methods to correct judgments.