Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - How to review the comprehensive writing of exams in institutions in Shandong Province?
How to review the comprehensive writing of exams in institutions in Shandong Province?
According to my experience, I can follow the following steps and learn step by step.

1, chapter review

No matter which subject is divided into big chapters and small class hours, generally, after all the class hours of a chapter are finished, the whole chapter will be strung together and told systematically.

As a review, we can also do this, because since it is a chapter of knowledge, all the lessons before class must be related. We can find out their similarities and string these bits and pieces of knowledge together by using the linked memory method, which is more convenient for us to remember.

Step 2 surprise before the exam

As the saying goes, when you get cold feet, you sharpen your knife and don't miss the woodcutter. Many students don't work hard at ordinary times and always make a surprise attack before the exam. Although this method is not desirable, I have to say that the memory of the assault before the exam is still very deep.

Especially when you see a knowledge point and get it in the exam, your memory will be deeper. Although it is not an effective review method, it also has certain effects.

3. Review by turns

Although we study more than one subject, some students only like reviewing. For example, if their Chinese is not good, they have been trying to review their Chinese without asking other subjects. In fact, this is a bad habit.

When people do something repeatedly for a long time, they will feel tired, which will lead to burnout and fail to achieve the expected results. So don't review a single subject, but take turns to go into battle, so as to turn monotonous review into an interesting thing and improve the review effect.

4, error correction finishing

You are bound to make mistakes during the exam. Whether you are careless or not, you should habitually collect these mistakes and establish an independent error set for each subject.

When we review before the exam, they are the key review objects, so since you missed it once, you can't make a mistake twice. So as not to lose points on the same issue again.

5. Mind mapping

Mind mapping is a great invention, which can not only systematize and visualize the data in your brain, but also help you think and analyze problems and make overall plans.

It is to draw all the knowledge with mind map, list a topic for each big content, and then recall and think about each topic, so that you can quickly analyze the context and key points of knowledge and remember them firmly.

Step 6 adjust your mentality

Mentality determines fate, and self-confidence can win a bright future for yourself. Some exams show a negative attitude, thinking that their competitive pressure is increasing, the exam is more difficult, the professional requirements are improved, it is difficult to get into the ideal unit, and they are not dominant in the competition.

Faced with such a situation, candidates should adjust their mentality in time, actively prepare for the exam, and believe in themselves with a constant mind. As long as you review carefully and do all the preparation work under the guidance of the teacher, all candidates can get good grades in the exam.

7. Targeted

Mastering the thinking of answering questions, paying attention to current events, understanding policies and mastering theories are the keys to improving the quality of doing questions. Master the thinking of answering questions. Be familiar with the thinking of answering various questions, answer them quickly and accurately in a short time, and improve the efficiency and accuracy of doing the questions.

Grasp the policy hotspots. By grasping the theoretical policies and current events, we can improve the reading quality and speed of materials. Cultivate the ability to control materials and improve the pertinence and accuracy of comprehensive writing answers.

8. Daily reserves

Usually, a large number of good words and sentences are accumulated, and famous sayings and standardized terms are accumulated to enhance the standardization and vividness of the article language. Directly using standard terms and current events as arguments can be directly used in the article to make the argument fully powerful.

Opening examination ideas, theoretical policies and social hotspots can help candidates to open their minds, correctly and comprehensively understand questions, accurately grasp key points, improve the reading speed and quality of materials, and help us to put forward feasible solutions that meet the actual work requirements when answering questions.

Extended data:

Judging the trend of comprehensive writing proposition in public institutions.

There are four different types of comprehensive writing topics in public institutions: viewpoint type, phenomenon type, relationship type and other type, which are different when judging positions, as follows:

Viewpoint type: the topic takes subjective viewpoint as the writing topic. For example, "brand is competitiveness". This kind of topic requires candidates to rely on materials to judge whether to support or deny, so as to determine their own position and put forward the central argument.

Phenomenological type: the topic takes objective phenomena as the writing topic. Such as "traffic jam" and "success anxiety". This kind of topic requires candidates to rely on materials to judge whether the phenomenon is good or bad (or whether there are advantages and disadvantages), so as to determine their own position and put forward the central argument.

Relational type: the topic takes two or more subject words (or phenomena or opinions) as the writing topic. Such as "exploration, discovery, insight". This kind of topic requires candidates to rely on materials to explore the relationship between subject words and take this as the central argument.

Other types: the topic itself does not provide a topic, but allows candidates to refer to the materials to find out the topic themselves. Because this kind of topic does not directly indicate the theme on the stem, candidates need to rely on materials to find the theme first, and then explore the central argument. Relatively speaking, this kind of problem will be slightly more difficult to solve.