The poster’s formulation is not clear enough, I hope you can add to it. Cooperation and competition are just phrases, and the views of the pros and cons are not clear... Just add some more, and I will come back when you have finished. Answer. Supplement: It is not as detailed as Zhengfang downstairs, but you can refer to Zhengfang’s answer and think of ways to refute him. (I am not a professional, so I can only provide a few directions for thinking.) First of all, you need to find the right position to make your argument: competition Better than cooperation means that cooperation is good, but competition is better. We do not deny that cooperation has certain benefits. Secondly, we can attack the other party’s foundation. For example, most (I must not say all) cooperation is to be more competitive. , and win the competition better. Of course, it is inevitable that cooperation can make civilization progress better, but the progress of civilization is fundamentally the development of productive forces, and productivity is man's ability to transform nature, which is the competition between man and nature. In the final analysis, cooperation is for better competition. These aspects are relatively important. You can focus on this and refer to the examples and famous quotes of the two guys who talk the most... I will repeat it again.

Please adopt if you are satisfied