Those who cannot tolerate others are not worthy of being tolerated by others - Bernay.
——Inscription
Tolerance is a virtue, but how can we truly tolerate others? I think a very important way is to learn to think from others' perspective.
When you learn to think from other people’s perspective, you will see things from other people’s perspective and put yourself in others’ shoes when you encounter problems. However, only when we do this, can we Be more understanding of others and tolerant of others. In life, you must learn to put yourself in someone else's shoes. When you have conflicts with classmates, turn hostility into friendship and rebuild good friendships. When you encounter setbacks, you may as well turn negativity into hope, and the sun will smile at you. When we learn and practice empathy, we will find that life is actually very beautiful and we feel in a good mood every day.
"There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers" This is really insightful. Yes, you may think that Hamlet is a coward who is only interested in random thoughts but timid in practice, but I read that his sentence "To live or to die, that is the question" is extremely profound.
If this is the case in reading, why is it not the same in life? Different lives, different environments, different outlooks on life, different ways of thinking - different identities determine different perspectives of thinking. There may be conflicts between two people's thoughts, but please put yourself in the other person's shoes and the complaints or anger that pour into your heart will disappear. As the reader sees Hamlet, who can say which one is absolutely correct? No, so you have to accommodate the other person's point of view and put yourself in their shoes to gain a more thorough understanding of the other person's comedy.
If you put the same flower in front of you, you will have the feeling of "when the flowers wither and the flowers fly all over the sky, who will pity the red flowers when the fragrance fades", and there will also be the feeling of "falling red flowers are not heartless things, they turn into pounded mud" "More protective flowers" is profound.
The same bright moon hangs in the night sky. Zhang Ruoxu would recite his thoughts: "Who first saw the moon by the river, and when did the moon shine on people?" Li Taibai would sigh, "The moonlight is bright in front of the bed. It’s the nostalgia of frost on the ground.”
Can you blame Sister Lin’s sadness for being dependent on someone else? Can you deny the fact that red leaves protect flowers? Can you blame Zhang Ruoxu for complaining about nothing? Can you disdain Taibai's nostalgia? I'm afraid not even. That’s why we need to learn to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes, to appreciate the rich connotation of a flower, and to feel the same moon that turns out to be so affectionate.
Learn to put yourself in someone else's shoes, and you won't walk past those begging hands with a frosty look on your face. There will be one more hungry beggar today. Learn to put yourself in someone else's shoes, and you won't laugh at the cleaners on the road. You will have the support of the idea of ??"labor is glorious". If you learn to put yourself in someone else's shoes, you won't turn your friends into enemies again. Perhaps, if you learn to put yourself in someone else’s shoes, if the sky is affectionate, the sky will also grow old!
It’s just that empathy is not a frivolous word. To learn it, you need to have a broad mind, a broad tolerance, and a considerate heart.
If you are ready, please be open-minded and learn to think from someone else's perspective. You will find that the world could have been so beautiful, life could have been so rich, and the spirit could have been so fulfilling.
1+1=? Different people have different calculation methods, and the conclusions and answers they draw are also different. Mathematicians have spent half their lives trying to prove 1+1=2. Some people say: "1+1=3 is a writer. 1+1=2 is a mathematician. 1+1=0 is a philosopher." That’s right, mathematicians seek truth from facts, that’s why science cannot be false; writers like to process the original stories and exaggerate the facts to make their writing shine; philosophers look at both pros and cons. The disadvantages and advantages of the problem are both there, so return to zero. Imagine writers, mathematicians, and philosophers sitting together and discussing 1+1=? When talking about a topic, I believe they will all come up with evidence that they think the answer is correct, but they are not convinced by each other. Based on the fact that they only look at the same problem from their own position, different positions will lead to different views, and different views will lead to different results. The same is true when looking at the entire society. Because different people handle a matter, the methods used may also be different, and the results may be even more different.
Think from someone else’s perspective, there are no absolutes in the world. Everything has two sides.
When we encounter other people who have different opinions, we might as well put ourselves in their shoes, consider certain issues from the other person's point of view, and deal with the problem from the other person's point of view and the environment they are in. It is possible that some Some of the conflicts that we see as irreconcilable, when we are "overwhelmed by mountains and rivers, and there is no way out", because of our empathy, we have entered the realm of "a village with dark flowers and bright flowers". Please learn to think differently!