Happy pigs with different status are unhappy in the slaughterhouse if they are afraid of death. Philosophers will be happier than pigs if their truth can be universally accepted and implemented. Philosophers can also practice carefree like Laozi and Zhuangzi.

Respondent: yju 666- Scholar Level 2 6-8 08:35

Pigs are happy because of ignorance, and they just need to be satisfied with their survival.

Philosophers are happy because they know. He knows why.

So the happiness of pigs is obvious. Philosophers are seldom happy, but that doesn't mean they are unhappy.

Responder: a storm and a worry-lifting people to level 5 6-8 08:52

There are only two kinds of people in the world, one is a painful philosopher and the other is a happy pig ~ ~

Respondent: sumo 1987- Assistant II 6-8 09:34

"Happiness" is a feeling of people. When you say the pig is happy, that's its happiness in your eyes. Yes, the pig eats and sleeps, lives entirely by instinct and doesn't care about anything, but it doesn't realize that it is happy at all.

Philosophers can realize whether they are happy or not, but happiness and pain go hand in hand. No pain, no happiness. No one is happy all his life. Philosophers are painful. To some extent, this painful thinking is the greatest happiness.

Responder: Rhythmic Firefly-Auxiliary Level 2 6-8 10: 14.

philosopher

Because pigs have no thoughts.

At least at this stage, what humans know is not yet.

Respondent: Song of the Year-probationary period level 1 6-8 10:30.

First, philosophers are doomed to pain.

Second, pigs cannot be happy.

Pigs have two characteristics, stupid and carefree. It is carefree because it is stupid. If you are stupid, you don't have to think about anything, you don't think about anything, you can't think about it anyway, you just don't want to. So it is stupidity that makes it carefree. It is content with the status quo and does not pursue meaningless fame and fortune; It is content with the status quo, content with eating, drinking, being happy, getting enough sleep and letting nature take its course, but it just conforms to the optimistic spirit of Taoism.

"Pig ~ ~ ~, you have two holes in your nose", Xiang Xiang sang this feature of the pig and also sang the voice of the pig.

"Look how happy the pigs in the pigsty are."

"You are not a pig, how do you know the happiness of a pig?"

"You are not me, how do you know that I don't know the happiness of pigs?"

"I'm not you, so I don't know your happiness. You are not a pig, so you don't know the happiness of pigs. Right? "

"When you ask me how I know the happiness of pigs, you already know: I know the happiness of pigs."

Now you know why pigs are happy.

Of course, pigs are unpleasant. But you know, likability comes at a price. Pugs are likable, but people call others Pugs while they like Pugs. Although people also call others pigs, pigs are self-cleaning, so scold them, and there is nothing to lose anyway. What's more, according to Taoist thought, there is no distinction between liking and not liking in the world, but someone likes something and then dislikes it relatively. Because pigs will not change with the change of people's ideas, will not take the initiative to please people, and still live their own lives, unlike pugs, "times have changed", so pigs have become the object of people's hatred. People often use their own standards to measure foreign things, but they don't know that pigs are just happy to enjoy their own lives, go their own way and let others scold them. However, the more people scold, the more they strengthen this perceptual knowledge of hate, so as to make themselves more clear about love and hate. It's also good to have clear love and hate, but it's necessary to understand that twill people need to be tied up to solve the problem. We need to learn from others to overcome the strong and eliminate love and hate with clear love and hate.

Some people say that pigs are too stupid, and swearing is called "stupid pig". I don't understand. Why are pigs stupid? He gave the pig an intelligence test? IQ below 80? That's really weird. What if an alien creature suddenly comes, has a super high IQ, gives people an intelligence test and finds himself too stupid? What should I do? Are they going to scold anything? Besides, there is no distinction between cleverness and stupidity in the world, just as people in ancient times were sincere, without hypocrisy, and did not need benevolence and righteousness at all. When saints and ethics correct people's behavior, hypocrisy appears. In ancient times, there was no difference between cleverness and stupidity. People just help each other. When there is excess productivity, people will have selfishness and competition. With competition, there will be cleverness and stupidity. Smart people only know that they are smart, but they don't know where the road is. They don't know the dialectical unity of cleverness and stupidity. The IQ given by God is the best. Don't be too demanding if you don't have enough people. The happiness of pigs lies in being content with the status quo, letting nature take its course, not demanding, and not diminishing marginal utility. Moreover, people are always admitted to Jiaotong University and want to go to Harvard again. Monthly salary 10000, I want to get another 20000. Therefore, being a pig is often happier than being a man.

Responder: lyhuangxf- Jianghu hero level 9 6-8 10:30

History (surname)

Respondent: Lingling-Assistant Level 2 6-8 10:38

The pig is stupid, so it doesn't know whether it is happy or not.

The philosopher is happy because he knows what happiness is.

Therefore, philosophers are happier than pigs.

Interviewee: Qingqing Bugua-Apprentice Magician Level 3 6-8 1 1:26

At first, I thought pigs were happy, because pigs didn't have so many problems to consider, and carefree was not bad.

Later, I think philosophers are happier, because they have their own thinking, can see through many problems, and can get many things that pigs will never know and understand.

After that, I still feel that pigs are happier, because philosophers have thinking, see many social things and have troubles, but pigs don't.

Finally, I feel that both have gains and losses, and neither side is more dominant.

Answer: The nickname is Xiao Qiang-Jianghu rookie level 5 6-8 12:2 1.

First of all, what we are talking about here is happiness, not knowledge or ignorance, cleverness or stupidity. So, what do you mean by happiness? Modern Chinese Dictionary explains that happiness means feeling happy or satisfied. We believe that happiness is: people's positive psychological evaluation of their own state, their relationship with others or society under certain historical conditions, and it is a relative and concrete subjective psychological feeling.

On the one hand, happiness is a positive mental state. A person may have a successful career and a happy family, but if he is not satisfied with it, then he will naturally not be happy. At the same time, a person may not have a successful career, a happy family, or even be naked and hungry, but he will also have his own happiness. Even for a pig who is considered ignorant and stupid, it can become extremely happy because it has no worries about food and clothing and faces the status quo calmly.

On the other hand, happiness is a relative, concrete and subjective psychological feeling. A person may have different psychological feelings about the same thing in different situations and conditions, and different people may have different psychological feelings about the same thing in the same situation and conditions. People should not doubt or deny the happiness of pigs whose intelligence is quite different from that of human beings because of their advanced intelligence or aesthetic level, let alone think that the so-called lower animals are really unhappy than the higher animals.

Secondly, based on our understanding of happiness, happiness is a feeling of satisfaction or satisfaction, a positive psychological evaluation of self, the relationship between self and others or the state of social relations under certain conditions, and a relative and concrete subjective psychological feeling. So we think pigs are happy. Because we judge whether a person or a pig is happy, we think and judge from his or his pig's point of view, and we can't rely on subjective assumptions or arbitrariness.

As a much lower and more stupid animal than human beings, pigs mostly live in human reproduction. They may not know that their fate is to be slaughtered or barbecued by human beings, but they are satisfied with the gift of human beings. They are very calm and have no complaints about food, shelter and environment. It is a kind of contentment and no complaints.

Thirdly, in view of our consistent view of happiness and the understanding of pig happiness, we believe that pigs who are calm and happy about themselves and their relationship with others or society are happier than their philosophers!

It is true that we do not deny that there are happy philosophers, or that philosophers have happy moments, but which philosopher can be happier than our lovely pig's life? Throughout their lives, pigs are happy, and philosophers such as Nietzsche and Schopenhauer also had happy lives? What's more, the Russian philosopher Radishev committed suicide by taking poison, and the famous philosopher Wang Guowei of China also committed suicide. Excuse me: Is the "happy" philosopher who committed suicide happier, or the pig who calmly faced life and death happier?

Our philosopher Wang Guowei: human nature is desire, and desire is endless; Some desires can be realized, although they can be proud for a while, but they are rapidly changing and fleeting; Most desires cannot be realized, resulting in all kinds of troubles and pains; On the contrary, sometimes I lose my desire, have no desire in my heart, feel empty and bored, and feel more troubled and painful. In this way, the philosopher's temporary happiness is just a temporary satisfaction of desire and a short stay of mind. How rare and short-lived the so-called happiness is; The pig's calmness, cheerfulness and happiness run through life, and it is full and enjoyable everywhere. Therefore, pigs are happier than philosophers! !

Perhaps another debater will ask us: Since pigs are happier and happier than philosophers, would you rather be an ignorant pig or a wise philosopher?

I want to say that the center of our discussion today is to be happier. If I have to choose between knowledge and wisdom, I will choose a philosopher, a philosopher who faces up and admits that pigs are really much happier than us, and a philosopher who is willing to learn from pigs how to be happier!

Here are some information about happiness that may be useful:

Han Jiaogan's Shoes of Lin Yigan: "Richness and pleasure."

Hokkekyo Jing Juan: "Wang is much happier living in the palace, playing music all day."

Yin Mingtang wrote in his poem "Feelings": "With the joy and drunkenness of Qian Qian, idle people in the world go to heaven."

Ba Jin's home VI: "He is neither happy nor sad."

Have fun. -Tao Jin Yuanming's "Peach Blossom Garden"

The tourists went and the birds were happy. -Ouyang Xiu's Drunk Pavilion

Kant believes that "happiness means that our needs are met".

Interviewee: Get what you want-assistant level 3 6-8 12:37.

Babies will laugh when they meet familiar people or eat and run away, but they will not be happy, because it is only instinctive and instinctive satisfaction. When pigs are killed, they will be afraid. This is the most important feeling given by life, so pigs will only be afraid of sadness and will not be happy. The philosopher doesn't know whether he will be happy soon.

Respondent: _ eggplant ABC- probation period level 1 6-8 12:39

There is something wrong with this debate. No one can feel the happiness of pigs. The latter said that pigs have no so-called happiness. But philosophers have their joys and sorrows. So the philosopher's anger and sadness will offset the joy and joy. As for pigs, it's much simpler.

Interviewee: 6-8 14:23, a new assistant to an old Chinese medicine doctor.

Philosophers need to understand the happiness of pigs.

God knows who is happier than who.

Responder: skingfor- trainee magician level 2 6-8 16:25

I guess pigs are happy, because philosophers will think about whether pigs are happy, and pigs will not be idle to think about whether philosophers are happy.

This question is really profound ~~lz is very talented ~ My political teacher said that different world views, different values, and even his education stand will have different views. How can you know the happiness of a pig if you are not a pig ~

Reply: Thirsty Flying-Introduction to Jianghu Level 3 6-8 17:42

Happy pig or miserable philosopher, don't you think?

Responder: Tong Yizhe-Trainee Magician Level 2 6-9 00:08

Philosophers are happy, because according to dialectical materialism, only people are conscious can we talk about happiness, pigs are not people, philosophers are people, and they can also be happy. So philosophers are happier.

Respondent: hbrx- manager level 4 6-9 00: 19

Pigs are happy, because Socrates once said, "There are two things in this world, one is a happy pig and the other is a painful person. Be a miserable person, not a happy pig. "

Responder: Lei Game Assistant Level 2 6-9 0 1:08

This argument is a bit nonsense, but in any case, it is the happiness of pigs, because any living thing should be happier than philosophers. It's not that you don't know anything, so you are the happiest philosopher and know everything, so he is the least happy.

Interviewee: Joelin _ Kim-Juren Level 4 6-9 04:22

I am happier than that. Haha ~ Ignorant pigs and optimistic philosophers will be happy. Ignorance has the pleasure of ignorance, and erudition has the interest of erudition. Simple thinking and complex thinking can be happy or unhappy. Is the landlord happy?

Responder: H Baidu H Assistant Level 2 6-9 07:39

Some time ago, I went out to study. On the trip, I can't help talking about how to be a teacher and how to make my life happier. A colleague broke a classic: there are only two choices in life, either to be a happy pig or to be a painful philosopher. Unforgettable When the journey is coming to an end and I am about to return, I think I will be a painful philosopher from tomorrow. In fact, happiness and pain are relative. We think that pigs are happy. In fact, they also have pain. We just can't feel it. Sometimes, we tend to equate the life of a pig with the life of a pig. I can't say how much difference there is, but at least it can't be equal. People must think, keep asking questions, have goals and keep achieving them. In this process, is it happiness or pain? Different value orientations often lead to different conclusions. In fact, the happiness and pain in the world are only people's subjective experiences. Every day has reasons to make us miserable and reasons to make us happy! My choice is to be a happy philosopher. Starting today, we will be a happy person!

References:

/d/736 1/42434.shtml

Respondent: Hi loser-the first stage of the probation period 6-9 08:32

Happiness is a kind of inner feeling. How can people know the happiness of pigs?

Since this is the topic, shouldn't there be a sign of happiness first? What is happiness?

Respondent: Yang Tianxiao 2007- Primary Level 1 6-9 18:59.

If a philosopher knows how to be satisfied, then he can be happy.

Pigs can't be happy if they don't know how to be satisfied.

Respondent: ztangry- Assistant Level 3 6-9 20:34

People are pigs when they think they are happy.

When pigs think that people are pigs, people are still pigs.

When people put the definition and standard of happiness on pigs, they must be pigs.

It can't be proved that pigs are happier or unhappy than people, because people and pigs can't be compared.

Happiness or unhappiness comes from one's own feelings as well as one's inner feelings, even if happiness or unhappiness is different between people.

The mating process of pigs eating and drinking Lazarus is the same as that of humans, which is a physiological need.

Interviewee: heyu 19770705- manager level 5 6-9 23:07.

A neutral attitude, I feel that happiness depends on myself. For example, I like to eat steamed stuffed buns, and I am very happy. And you like eating apples, and you are happy, which means that happiness is their own feeling. Pigs and philosophers have their own understanding of happiness. You can't stop me from eating steamed buns, and you still insist on it. How can onlookers know the heart of the client! !

Another debater, happiness is itself! ! !

Responder: UFO 8337228- Trainee Magician Level 3 6- 10 16:33

There is no comparability. However, philosophers are happy although they are distressed by their ignorance.

Respondents: P.E. 32 1 123- Scholar Level 3 6- 10 2 1:43.