"Moral kidnapping" means demanding ordinary people by the standards of saints and moral obligations by virtue. Or confuse political obligation with moral obligation. For example, asking a person to lay down his life to save others, or he will be condemned, is moral kidnapping. From one point of view, this is a kind of thinking with chaotic moral judgment logic.
? As for why the logic of moral judgment is confused, I would like to say some immature ideas here. Personally, one is that the current policy can be enforced, but it is really helpless; Second, for the weakness of human nature, harmony is the most important, so you can bear it. Some of them are influenced by ancient thinking, or they are convinced that "the prime minister can punt in his stomach" and "take a step back and broaden the horizon" are wise sayings, so they obviously feel wronged and have a sense of pride; The third is that the other party is too aggressive and overbearing. In people's minds, it is better to do more than one thing, and don't make trouble when you are away from home. It is also the hard work of parents since childhood, and the teacher's inculcation has been implanted with thoughts and has penetrated into the bone marrow. Is it that easy to change? As far as the group is concerned, it is more polarized, so it shows that one party is strong and the other is weak, and there are two camps. In the face of the same problem, if there is a result, one side loses and the other side obeys. In this case, it will inevitably lead to the logical confusion of personal moral judgment, and the gas field in the middle will also lead others, people who don't know around, to immerse themselves in this logical confusion of moral judgment. Then, the people who ate melons began to vomit a lot, so a cross-screen war of words began!
In this case, I can only say that it is everyone's responsibility to protect themselves. If you can't protect yourself, who will?
?