What is science? "Science" should be a truth that is credible to mankind; the purpose of establishing "science" is to tell people the existence of some facts in the universe, and to truly and sincerely dissect many things that people still don't know. thing. However, by using Darwin's reputation and correcting Darwin's theme, the fans who took advantage of the topic changed the direction of the meaning of "science". It is not about discovering the existence of unknowable facts to study and explore in depth, but more simply and concisely than ordinary people─ Throw it away. Whatever is invisible, incomprehensible, and cannot be put into the laboratory, no matter how real, is shelved. Or call it religious belief, superstition or idealism. It is swept into the dustbin with a broom and hits a dead end. You don't enter it yourself and don't allow others to enter it. The concept of "Darwin" has become synonymous with science above all else, so people expect that "science" will continue for more than 150 years until today, and there will be so many unsolved mysteries in the world. Many so-called "sciences" have now become child's play and have completely lost their "scientific" value. Darwin's "science" should only be responsible for the level of farmer cultivation. A bright and tidy room is obscured by the dirt of the light bulb and cannot see the truth, and even the true high-tech achievements suffer.
If human beings want to truly achieve progress, they must first change the immanence of the meaning of "science", or simply replace the word "science" with more appropriate words so that people can gain true knowledge. Science, enjoy true knowledge.
Life on earth is by no means the result of random evolution based on the theory of evolution. The scientific study of the true origin of humans on earth must not be conducted purely from the perspective of biological struggle, but should be started from multiple perspectives including intangibility and transcendence. Research. Otherwise, mankind in this generation will never get the essence of science, and will only know the word "science".
5,000 years ago, Cangjie saw that the word "ox" had two horns on its head and four legs under its belly, so he created the word "fish". When he saw that "fish" had no legs and only a tail, he created the word "fish". The word "cow" was added. When the teachings were spread to various tribes, they were careless and turned upside down. The one with only one tail and no legs is pronounced as "cow", and the one with four horns is pronounced as "fish". Thousands of miles away, people are taught to pronounce the word "heavy" as "heavy". On the contrary, the word "heavy" (heavy), which should represent weight when two mountains are put together, teaches people to pronounce the word "chu" (chu) for traveling far away. It is still used today, and some readers and teachers have paid attention to it. Who can change the pronunciation of these words? Is it not wrong if the pronunciation of these words cannot be changed?
Someone discovered it at that time and pointed it out, but it has been taught to various tribes. Became a household name. For this reason, the person involved, Cangjie, was so ashamed that he even knelt down with tears in his eyes to express his repentance. However, these words have been spread all over the world and cannot be changed.
The same is true for Darwin's "Evolution Theory"; it was spread as a philosophy of struggle at that time, but now it affects people as biology. However, humans cannot change as apes. The person involved, Darwin, wrote with embarrassment in the "Extremely Perfect and Complex Organs" section of Chapter 6 (Theoretical Problems) of his book "The Origin of Species": "I frankly admit that The hypothesis that eyes were formed through natural selection seems to be the most ridiculous. "Similarly, many advanced researchers and truly accomplished scientists have discovered and pointed out this. Darwin also expressed remorse, but it had already spread all over the world. He did not expect that people would actually treat his "theory of evolution" as "science" and put it on the screen. The only way to coax the fish down is to draw the four legs of the "fish" into tails, and the mistakes can only be passed on to this day. No one cares, no one knows, they just copy and copy, because its shape is no longer a pictogram. , regardless of whether it has four legs or eight legs. Unfortunately, the word "heavy" thousands of miles away is too obvious, and people often see it. My parents-in-law and my descendants racked their brains and searched for etymology, but they couldn't find any eloquent words. No matter how many years of influence, no one can change it, as long as they "never admit their mistakes".
However, people who have never seen a "fish" should not insist on admitting that a "fish" has four legs; even if people have seen a "fish", they should not open their mouths and say Shouted: "Fish" has four legs! If you want to mix it with "science", you cannot allow any falsehood.
Even if there is a scientific explanation of the tangible phenomenon "seeing is believing", it may not be the real truth;
When we look at Altair and Vega in the sky, they are both small stars. The highlight, in fact, is that Altair and Vega are 10 and 50 times brighter than the Sun, and 7 and 27.6 times larger in diameter.
People! What is knowledge? Only one kind of knowledge is true. One plus one is two. If the answer is not two, it is wrong or false. Stop being childish. There is no sophistry to explain. Using strong words can only show your stupidity.
The word "evolution" conforms to human logical reasoning, but "apes evolve into humans" does not have any credible evidence or scientific reason. If one more year of study means one more year of vacation, then what's the point of graduating from college?
Today, when dark matter and dark energy have been revealed by modern scientists, they will soon unravel the secrets in the universe. When all mysteries are revealed, I believe that human beings will occupy the palace of true "science", and the hat of "science" will definitely be worn on the head of true "science".
The saddest thing is that in China, no matter whether it is true or not, humans generally do not think about it, and they can always hear the greatest expression of identity: "I only believe in science." !” No one who can say this knows what science is, and the strange thing is that people who really know science will never say: “I only believe in science!”
Of course I only believe in it! Science is good. Generally, people who say this still consider themselves to be "knowledgeable" so-called materialists, and think that they are extremely noble. Little do they know that this "science" is just a small discipline that explores the mysterious ready-made universe and finds a few clues; this is limited to the fact that the "material" visible to the naked eye is only 4% of the universe, and the real things But it is the 96% that cannot be seen by the naked eye. People who only hold up the words "science" and "materialism" often do so because they don't know what "science" is. If you really use your thinking to enter the exploration and research of the universe, you will not ignorantly say: "I Just believe in science”.
It's like the owner of a villa said to his son one day: "Son, this villa belongs to you." The son looked full of knowledge and smiled and replied: "I only believe that according to the What picture of this villa!”
What’s even more sad is that the picture of the villa is called materialism, but the real villa is called idealism. As long as it is this thing, what you get is a piece of paper; you don’t want this. Heart, I really have no heart from now on!
People don’t know that science is a discipline that explores and studies existing materials in the universe, because it will never be able to break through the universe and become the only truth, that is, it is just a picture drawn according to this villa. A floor plan.
To put it simply, "science" is when children lick fruit candies with their tongues; which one is banana candy and which one is chocolate, and it is often wrong. Who can make people see the truth and lead them into the candy factory? In particular, the "evolutionary theory", the struggle philosophy of "the weak and the strong", has been mixed into the scientific queue as biology. After entering the textbooks, human beings have become confused and it is difficult to distinguish right from wrong.
The period when Peking Man lived has been taught to mankind for so many generations in textbooks. Now it is found that the age of the textbooks taught by the people is wrong by more than 200,000 years;
The protein molecules that make up life must have water to maintain The inherent concept of three-dimensional structure is now found to be wrong;
It has been a generally accepted view throughout history: the beautiful feathers of male peacocks are to attract the opposite sex; the color change of chameleons is to blend in with the environment and hide themselves , the purpose of deceiving the enemy. However, it is now discovered that both views appear to be inaccurate...and so on.
Because of this, many people who only remember the old scripts will cling to the "ape-to-human" of the backward era 150 years ago.
An article on page 23 of "Metropolitan Express" on August 15, 2006 said: It's hard to believe that astronomers don't know what a planet is. ...There may be 8 planets in the solar system, or there may be 50, and all existing textbooks will be rewritten...
Many relevant scientific discussions in textbooks are based on current scientific discoveries. In other words, many of them are false, but there is no way to rewrite them. There are many aspects that even great writers cannot explain satisfactorily, and they will not explain them, because any explanation would overthrow all known knowledge. There are also many difficult problems that cannot yet be explained and proven with the current scientific level and means of mankind, but they do exist. No real scientist in the world dares to say: I can answer everything in the universe; and no book called "science" dares to write "absolutely correct."
Human knowledge is limited. This is known to most profound scientists and senior intellectuals.
An article by a top scientist in Information Technology News (Stegodragon/Compiled) said: Physicists have a good standard model, which carves the known universe into a particle system and can be used to describe anything. , from magnetism to the composition of atoms to how they remain stable. The standard model treats particles as infinitesimal points with fundamental forces. There are two obvious problems with such a Standard Model: it fails to include gravity, and it becomes useless data in the face of high energies.
You already think the actual concept is best understood, hell, Newton figured it out long ago, but is it correct?
No, gravity is the weakest of the known forces in the universe, and standard models of physics cannot explain how it is produced. Gravity is completely different from the other forces that can be described by the Standard Model. When you do some calculations on the gravitational force of small interactions, you get stupid answers.
An article on page 7 of "Reference News" on June 15, 2010, reported by the British "Sunday Times" on June 13: Leader of the most authoritative scientific institution in the UK, professor of cosmology at Cambridge University, British Royal Martin Rees, chairman of the association, said: "The mysteries of the universe may never be solved because they are beyond the scope of people's understanding."
Rees said that due to the limited wisdom of human beings, we may never be able to solve problems such as whether parallel universes are Difficulties such as existence, the cause of the Big Bang, and the nature of human consciousness.
Rees pointed out that Einstein used the mathematical theory of the early 19th century to propose the general theory of relativity in 1915, believing that gravity controls the activities of planets and stars. Physicists in the early 20th century such as Dirac used "ready-made" mathematical methods to propose quantum theory, which explained the workings of the universe from the subatomic level.
The problem faced by future generations is that these two theories are opposite in many aspects, and no one can find a mathematical method to combine the two into a "unified theory". Thousands of scientists have spent decades working on this problem and still can't figure it out.
Reese believes that "human beings may have reached the limit of understanding." He even said that human beings are like fish. Although they swim around in the sea all day long, they have no understanding of the properties of the water in which they live. known.
The 7th page of "Reference News" on September 27, 2011 reprinted an article reported on the website of the British "Sunday Times" on September 25, saying: In many cases, science is not revised gradually and frequently. As for development, a more common situation is: scientists have been digging along dead ends like madmen for decades or even centuries, until one day a genius suddenly appears, or an accidental discovery turns the initial hypothesis and its valuable Certainty is completely overturned.
What is the truth of human life? What is the true knowledge of life? If you get it, civilization will come out of your heart; if your nation gets it, a unique effect will naturally occur in your nation. Come;
Professor An Yanshi, a well-known person, said: The United Kingdom and the United States, which believe in Protestant Christianity, are developing the fastest; most Nobel Prize winners in science believe in Protestant Christianity, and only later did the West catch up with the East;
The United States is a developed country with science and technology, and it is also the country with the most popular Christianity.
In the past century, major human inventions have appeared in the United States. For example, the telegraph was born in the United States in 1837, the typewriter was born in the United States in 1867, the telephone was born in the United States in 1876, the incandescent lamp was born in the United States in 1879, and the washing machine was born in the United States in 1901. The air conditioner was born in the United States in 1904, the airplane was born in the United States in 1908, the refrigerator was born in the United States in 1913, the television was born in the United States in 1922, the fax machine was born in the United States in 1925, the talkie was born in the United States in 1927, and the electrostatic copier was born in 1938. Born in the United States, the atomic bomb was born in the United States in 1945, the computer was born in the United States in 1946, the microwave oven was born in the United States in 1947, the hydrogen bomb was born in the United States in 1952, Americans discovered the double helix structure of DNA in 1953, and the integrated circuit was born in the United States in 1958. In 1959, the video tape recorder was born in the United States. In 1960, Americans proposed the principle of maglev train. In 1969, Americans were the first to land on the moon. In 1971, email was born in the United States. In 1975, the United States built a relatively complete network. In 1990, the Internet began to globalize. The networking of computers is the networking of human brains - mankind on earth has officially entered the information age! So many original inventions have changed the development status of all mankind, the world structure and human lifestyle. Without the pioneering technology of the United States, it is impossible to imagine what our world would be like now! The United States only accounts for 5% of the world's total population, but accounts for about 30% of the world's GDP! Technology and economy are like this, and the military is even more dominant! It has only been 219 years since Washington was inaugurated as the first president of the United States in 1789 (2008). Why can the United States do this? Are Americans smarter than people from other countries or ethnic groups? No! The rapid development of the United States is due to the fact that the United States has a large number of good sons and daughters who know the Creator. Their country has been blessed because they have entered the realm of higher levels of spiritual consciousness in the universe; this is true science, also called true knowledge. It drives spiritual civilization and promotes social stability, harmony and development. The deeper they study the universe, the more clearly they see the Creator, and the more they fear the Creator. Science enabled them to know the "man from heaven", and the "man from heaven" changed their lives. Everyone understands science, everyone can use science, and science has been popularized.
Even though their science is so advanced, they do not worship science because they know what science is. On November 27, 2011, the 7th page of "Reference News" reprinted the British "Financial Times" report on November 25 with the title: Why do Americans not like science?
The article said: ...The CEO said, " Oh, I don’t believe in science,” and the article reposted by the Chinese said: “Can this person continue to do this? Are you kidding? This is unbelievable.” The article goes on to say: "These remarks may be echoed by many observers, especially American scientists."
Why is this? Because people who really get into science understand what is True science, this is indeed "unbelievable" in China. People who only talk about "science" in a high-profile manner are because science has not yet become popular. People have only heard this new term as a fashion, and they still don't know what science is. Even they can't distinguish between "science" and "philosophy". Darwin's philosophy of struggle in the backward era 150 years ago was "the weak and the strong" and never felt ashamed for the sake of science. This is just like if there are many people watching a play, everyone will talk about the play as a high point. If the performers talk more about the play, they will talk less about the play, because they know that the work is compiled by an author, and everything is done purely according to the director's intention. Just an action.
Maybe you are the boss of the beggar class, and maybe getting a bowl of white rice is worth bragging about, but compared with the boss’s feast, there is nothing to brag about. In the face of the facts, I can only feel ashamed! There is no room for falsehood.