I think everyone should have this question, that is, are celebrities created by their own people? What about this one, is it true or false?

First of all, there is definitely such a thing as celebrities framing people, but it is reasonable. Celebrities think that basically everyone stands up, and if I don’t stand up, I won’t suffer. So let’s tell you the benefits of building your own house: First, it must be to increase the public’s favor, which also reflects that this person’s house is generally positive, which is understandable. After all, no celebrity is stupid enough to build a house for someone who is a big name. Secondly, creating a person can increase the sense of presence and leave memories for netizens. For example, creating a straight man for a male star, a foodie for a female star, etc., can help everyone remember it faster. Third, once the person succeeds and doesn't fall apart, think about it. This is a virtuous cycle. Of course the company and the artists are happy when they make money, but it also enhances the company's control over the artists. And netizens are very happy and feel that they are right.

Then the next question is whether the star’s design is real.

If you want to say it is true, it is not true. If you want to say it is false, it is not completely false. To sum up, it is half true and half false. For example, this male star's performance is somewhat good. Alas, the company will set up a school for him as soon as it is considered. So in many cases, the so-called artificial design is just an amplified trait. However, the editor said that this is normal, and the company also believes that this is not a complete deception of the public. This self-deceiving operating company is willing to do this. But someone set it up, which has nothing to do with the celebrity himself, so the celebrity is actually unwilling to do it if this company is put on him. Do you want to do what you usually do, work, act, and then play in private? Aren't you tired? Of course I am tired, but some celebrities endure it for money, and some may be forced by the company because they have no say. But this method has to be said to be dangerous. It's like, it's only a matter of time before the mice disguise themselves as a pack of cats.

So, to sum up, people can frame you, but you just don’t stand too far. After all, the people’s eyes are sharp. In fact, it's not just celebrities, there are also people who don't stand in the so-called people's group. As we grow older, our truest selves no longer know where to go. Adults not wearing masks? In front of the boss, we must protect the integrity of our employees, in front of our children, we must be good parents, etc. This kind of personality is like us putting various labels on ourselves: responsible, high emotional intelligence, good communication skills, etc. ~But only you know if you really like the person you want to be. It has to be said that good labels and good character can help us grow, but we may be confused. I like the labels I put on myself.

Our labels may be wrong, and so may the celebrities. Everyone makes mistakes. If a star mislabels himself, as long as it is not a major mistake in principle, such as forging academic certificates, etc. , I think the rest is understandable here.

I think we can be more tolerant of myself and others, and give them some time to find a more suitable "personal setting"