In fact, every statement makes sense. Human nature is good: people want a blank sheet of paper when they are born, and then they will be polluted. Inherent bad habits: people are born greedy, greedy, greedy and greedy, so they are evil. Later, we should educate them and so on, so that they can return to kindness.

Is human nature good or evil? There is no textual research. Like the story of chicken and egg. "At the beginning of life, human nature is good" is Confucianism. Xunzi's "At the beginning of life, inherent vice." But it can better explain human nature.

In life, wearing a mask is very tiring after all. In the network, human nature is exposed very openly. Cry if you want, love if you want, and hate if you want. However, hate is ethereal and can't last long after all. As time goes on and the id disappears, it will soon fade away. What can you hate?

But love will be remembered. Happy moments and happy words, occasionally aftertaste, as mellow as coffee. You don't necessarily get angry when you are presumptuous. ...

It seems to be beside the point. Let's go back to this topic. Local thinkers, including Confucianism, Legalism, Taoism, Mohism, Yin and Yang and their mixture, usually argue whether human nature is good or evil. No matter what the so-called correct answer to this question is, what can be noticed is the way these fires are answered:

Confucius said: Sex is similar, but learning is far away. Tell: there is no difference between good and bad human nature ... or: civil and military officials are prosperous and kind, quiet and energetic, and violent. Or that Yao is the king and has an image ... Meng said: the human heart has four ends, the heart of compassion and the end of benevolence; The heart of shame and evil, the end of righteousness; The words of the heart are the end of the ceremony; The heart of right and wrong is also the end of wisdom. Meng made another analogy: the trees on the mountain can grow into big trees according to their nature, but the mountains near the city are generally bare because they are often cut down, which hinders the normal growth of trees.

Today, we have finally solved the problem of good and evil of human nature that puzzles countless philosophers at home and abroad. Egoism is human nature, and from the political and moral point of view, human nature is evil. The famous physicist Schrodinger has a famous saying: "living things feed themselves by negative entropy." As an open self-organizing system, we can use the following formula to describe the change of entropy: ds=des+dis, where des represents the change of entropy brought by input and dis is the increase of entropy caused by irreversible process in the system. According to the second law of thermodynamics, dis can only be positive, des can be positive or negative. If people want to survive, they can only absorb negative entropy from the environment (that is, des should be negative) to prevent the increase of the overall entropy of the system. If des is not enough to offset the constant entropy increase of the system for a long time, it will have to reduce its order and organization to maintain the stable state of the system, and the result will be aging and death.

In order to survive, people must constantly absorb negative entropy, which is the root of self-interest. Since human nature is selfish and "evil", why does man benefit his behavior and kindness? In fact, the individual is only the basic unit of the upper system such as society and country, and the upper system needs to absorb the negative entropy of the lower system to increase the order of the whole system, so the lower system realizes the organic connection between itself and the upper system, thus producing the great significance of altruism, kindness, honor, discipline and sacrifice. The state promotes altruism through violence, morality, education and law, and a great life realizes its own value and long-term interests through labor, struggle and sacrifice.