An argumentative essay has three major elements: argument, argument, and demonstration. Arguments are evidence that proves that an argument is correct. To prove that an argument is correct, first of all, the arguments must feel real and credible, and can fully prove the argument. Secondly, the arguments must be typical and have the effect of “one is equivalent to ten”. Third, the arguments should be novel, and try to find some fresh arguments that can give people new feelings and revelations. 1. Argumentative arguments: There are two commonly used forms of arguments, namely factual arguments and rational arguments. Factual evidence: including representative and conclusive examples or historical facts. Reasonable arguments: refers to accurate theories that have been tested by people's practice and recognized by society, including social science theories, etc. The role of arguments is to fully and powerfully prove the central argument. 2. Argumentative argumentation: refers to the process and method of using arguments to prove arguments. It is the link between the logical relationship between arguments and arguments. The argument solves the problem of "what needs to be proved", the argument solves the problem of "what to prove", and the argument solves the problem of "how to prove". There are various methods of argumentation, and there are four types that we are required to master at the junior high school level: ① Demonstration with examples: citing conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove the argument; ② Reasonable argumentation: using incisive insights from Marxist classics and celebrities from all over the world, both ancient and modern. Use famous sayings and aphorisms as well as recognized theorems and formulas to prove the argument; ③ Comparative argument: Compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument in the comparison; ④ Metaphorical argument: Use familiar things as metaphors to prove the argument . 3. The role of argumentation methods: (1) Argumentation with examples, also known as the illustration method, using facts as arguments belongs to this method. Its function is: Facts speak louder than words, and specific, conclusive, sufficient, and representative examples to prove arguments can enhance the persuasiveness of the article. (2) Theoretical argumentation, also known as the citation method, argumentative essays using theoretical arguments belong to this argumentation method. Its function is: the truth that readers are familiar with can easily be recognized by readers, and during the reasoning process, readers' thinking can easily resonate with the author's ideas. Therefore, this argumentation method can enhance the logical power of the article and strengthen e68a84e8a2ad7a686964616f31333335313837 The persuasive power of the article. (3) Comparative argument, compare the positive and negative arguments or arguments, and prove the argument through comparison. Its function is: Only through comparison can there be identification. In the process of comparison, the reader reaches the recognition of the author's point of view through thinking, which enhances the persuasiveness of the argument. Moreover, using this method can enable the reader to have a deeper understanding of the truth to be proved. , the expression effect is better. (4) Metaphorical argument is to use familiar things as metaphors to prove the central argument. Its function is to make profound principles simple and abstract principles visual, making it easier for readers to understand. 4. There is an issue that needs to be paid attention to when analyzing the argumentation method of argumentative essays. In some articles, the author quoted an ancient text, and the content of the ancient text was a story. Some students could not figure out whether this was a theoretical argument or an argument with examples, because some teachers spoke more generally and used the phrase "quote" to describe everything. All these methods of argumentation are called theoretical arguments. In fact, they are not proved by the incisive insights in Marxist classics, the famous aphorisms of ancient and modern celebrities at home and abroad, and the universally recognized theorems and formulas. These general principles summarized by people are used as arguments to prove Arguments are logical arguments, while narrative content such as historical facts, examples, stories, etc. are still cited as examples.