In the system model, the "connection relationships" between "elements" are hierarchical. Partial thinking refers to the thinking habit that only focuses on low-level relationships and fails to see high-level purposes. This is partial thinking.
Partial thinking refers to the thinking habit that only focuses on low-level relationships and fails to see high-level purposes. A typical expression of partial thinking is: I don’t care about other things, this is the most important thing!
The corresponding one is hierarchical thinking and overall thinking.
The so-called hierarchical thinking is to use the thinking method of "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" to gain insight into the system models superimposed layer by layer. For example, there are cells with various functions in the human body, which constitute organs such as the heart. The heart is at a higher level than cells. Then, the heart, spleen, stomach, kidneys and other organs constitute the life of the human body. The human body is at a higher level than organs. Cells, organs, and the human body are three levels from low to high.
For example, what determines the rise and fall of an enterprise?
People with "hierarchical thinking" may tell you: It is the four levels of factors that determine the rise and fall of an enterprise.
The first level: era. When time abandons you, you won’t even say goodbye.
Level 2: Strategy. Don't use tactical diligence to cover up strategic laziness.
The third level: governance. The structure is wrong, nothing is right.
Level 4: Management. The essence of management is to inspire goodwill.
Among these four levels, era is higher than strategy, strategy is higher than governance, and governance is higher than management.
So how can we establish "hierarchical thinking"?
Keep asking yourself: Could the whole you see in front of you be a higher-level part?
Only by finding the connection relationship between each element can we find the fundamental solution to the problem.
After-class thinking questions:
Some people say that knowledge should be free. What do you think? Please think about this question on at least three levels.
Thoughts and answers:
1. From the perspective of the beneficiaries, knowledge must be free, but there are also disadvantages, because free things are usually not respected, such as water and water. Air will only be cherished when it is found to be lacking and polluted. From the provider's point of view, there is definitely a charge. If it is made for free, the quality will not be considered. Only charging can provide motivation and enable better iterations.
2. From the combination of the two, knowledge should not be free. The wisdom of our predecessors is our ladder. Fees and knowledge are the same interests. Only by promoting each other can both benefit at the same time.
3. From a higher level, knowledge can be made into a platform. Because it is the distribution of information, real users can be screened. The more users there are, the provider will have almost no marginal cost and great benefits. Then Users can also reduce fees.
Teacher Liang Ning’s five levels of user experience: micro-perception layer, role framework layer, resource layer, ability circle layer, and strategic existence layer;
The four levels organized by Teacher Ning Xiangdong There are three levels: professional unity, interest unity, career unity, and destiny unity;
Teacher Dai Su’s four levels of communication: clichés, facts, opinions, and feelings ;
Roy Martina’s three levels of happiness: competitive happiness (happy when you are better than others), conditional happiness (happy when conditions are met), and unconditional happiness (peaceful);
Maslow's five levels of needs: physiological needs, safety needs, love and belonging, respect and self-actualization;
The three levels of brands: category, quality, taste;
Three levels of goals: tactics, campaigns, strategies;
Four levels of geometry: point, line, surface, body;
Three levels of solutions: Symptom solution, cause solution, fundamental solution.