Shortcomings will not have much impact on the development of players.
If you want to say that the short board has no influence on the player's career, it is definitely wrong; But more often, as long as you find your own position, there is no particularly obvious impact. For example, Jordan, his three points are not good, but he throws less and is accurate. For another example, Durant's physical fitness became a big problem in the late Thunder, but when it came to the Warriors, the splash hit first, and the death came again at the last moment. For example, Harden's defense against the ball is very poor, and he even defends with his eyes; Then at the critical moment, you let him guard against the big one, and his big ass will not lose. . .
For role players, some are responsible for shooting three points, some are coolies, and some are responsible for organizing. The team wants you to do your job well. Then, for the person in charge of shooting three points, he doesn't need to practice holding singles; For a blue-collar worker, he doesn't need to practice three-pointers. . . It is precisely because of their own shortcomings that the impact on their careers may not be so great, so many players may not deliberately strengthen their shortcomings; Just like Howard. You will care about his rebounds and blocked shots, but you will care about how many scoring methods he uses in a game, whether he throws a ball or not. Therefore, there is no need for role players to make up for shortcomings. On the contrary, they will practice hard to ensure that their advantages can be constantly reflected on the court.
Some players just can't make up for the shortcomings.
Although there is no need to fill the short board, some players will choose to strengthen the short board. For example, Kobe, Kobe's professional premise, the three-pointer is very bad; However, through hard training in the future, he became the NBA three-point record holder (later broken by the splash). Another example is James, who won't hit back for a long shot a few years ago. After hard training, his back and long shot are much better. And like Brother Xin, who doesn't have a long shot, Simmons is also practicing shooting hard. But more players probably don't want to strengthen their shortcomings in their bones.
The reason why I don't want to strengthen it is not the necessity mentioned above. Another reason is that I have limited talent in some aspects, so I simply ignore such problems slowly. For example, O 'Neill can't practice free throws, so why should O 'Neill make great efforts to improve free throws? Of course, this can also be said to be related to the upper limit of each player. This is like the breakthrough of the letter brother, the low singles, the passing vision and the defense are all excellent enough. Considering his height and wingspan, if he still has top projection, other teams should not play with Bucks. For another example, although James has obviously improved his back-hitting and long-range shooting ability after hard training, he is still much worse than Kobe in these two aspects, which is the upper limit of Lao Zhan.
In addition to the upper limit, there are attitudes that don't want to be strengthened; For example, many NBA players are poor children, and when they get rich in the NBA, their nervous nerves may be relaxed. It's good that they can keep their advantages. How can they try to strengthen their shortcomings?
Why don't professional players strengthen their shortcomings? Generally speaking, there should be the following reasons.
1. Don't want to strengthen
My ability is enough to stand in the NBA, and I have no big ambitions. I earn enough money to spend. For example, with your present conditions and abilities, you can get an annual salary of millions or even tens of millions at work. Will you still ask for self-improvement? I think many people are satisfied. Not everyone is Kobe Bryant, and he can often go to training at four in the morning.
2. Can't strengthen it
We must admit that no one is perfect. Even if you are talented and motivated, you can't do everything. James is called the chosen son. Needless to say, he is brilliant and extremely strict with himself. So what? There are also short boards. Brother Alphabet is talented enough, but he just can't practice three points. Therefore, everyone has an upper limit. If you don't work hard, you will certainly make progress.
3. There is no need to strengthen
Based on the second point above, everyone has shortcomings. If we admit this, then our strategy is very simple. We will give full play to our advantages, and then use extra energy to make up for our shortcomings as much as possible. If we can do this, it will be great enough.
For example, James's advantage is his physical condition, and he can lead people to break through. Well, I'll give full play to this advantage. As for outside shooting, I just try my best to improve it. There is no need to spend a lot of time practicing on three-pointers and improve my three-pointer ability to Curry's level. Let's not talk about whether we can practice like Curry, even if we can, it will cost a lot, which is not worth it for a player like James. Because people's time is limited, we should consider the cost performance.
or vice versa, Dallas to the auditorium Curry's talent is reflected in three-pointers, so he will take this ability to the extreme, which is the most cost-effective way. Instead of gaining weight, it is better to practice hard every day to break through and turn yourself into "Little James".
Finally, for most players, I think the main reason is the first point, that is, I don't want to improve. They have the ability to stand in the league and have their own mature style of play. Any team is willing to sign me. I have a job, that's enough. Besides, every day's competition and training are enough. I want to spend more time enjoying life. Why should I be hard on myself?
Everyone knows his own shortcomings, but why not strengthen them?
Obviously, this is a simple question. Take us for example. When studying, the teacher always says that you should study hard and get into a good university. We also know that only by studying hard and struggling hard can we be close to success and have a chance to be admitted to our favorite university.
However, as a result, everyone knows that this matter will only be effective if it is done in this way, and the reason why it didn't come true in the end is that you didn't really work hard or didn't work hard enough.
Obviously, some players in the NBA are well aware of their shortcomings. As long as they strengthen their shortcomings, they will have a great chance to become superstars or even superstars in the future, but why not strengthen themselves?
This will consider many factors, such as whether this is what you like or are interested in, and it is also related to your own mood, personality and ambition.
Many people know their own shortcomings. As long as they are willing to work hard and don't say it, they will certainly succeed, or at least have a chance to get close to success. Simmons' three-pointer and Brother Alphabet's shot are short boards. As long as they practice, they must be superstar players in the league. I vaguely remember that Lakers star Kobe once suggested Simmons to practice shooting more, but Simmons responded to Kobe: I have my own way of playing, and I don't need to shoot. ...
Actually, doesn't Simmons know his shortcomings? I know for sure, but the reason why I haven't changed must be related to my personality and goals. Although Brother Xin is not good at three-pointers, everyone is practicing now. We have also seen that Jordan's free throws have increased compared with previous seasons, and everyone is practicing.
In fact, Curry and Harden's defense is not very bad. One is the reason why the offensive end can only rely on it. Physical strength will naturally decline when defending, and it is difficult to take over the game at a critical moment without physical strength. Not to mention being an NBA player, even in life, I know what to do is right, but I don't insist and struggle. It has a lot to do with people's desires.
Since it is called "short board", it is a technical disadvantage that everyone knows and everyone can see clearly.
As for why they don't make up this shortcoming and make themselves better, I think there are two reasons.
First, it is natural, that is to say, it is difficult to improve and strengthen through our own efforts.
For example, shaquille o'neal, the great shark, at the peak of his life, prevented people from killing, while the Buddha prevented people from killing, and there was almost no solution. However, his free throws are short boards, and his career free throw percentage is only 52.7%, which is lower than his shooting percentage of 58.2%.
Old Nelson also aimed at his own weakness and shortcomings and formulated the "shark-cutting tactics."
Other teams followed suit, which not only weakened O 'Neill's lethality, but even sometimes lost the game and cut it into pieces.
O 'Neill has made more than 5,300 free throws in his entire career.
This also prevented him from becoming a member of the 30 thousand club.
Later, in order to protect O 'Neill's players and make the game go smoothly, the league also stipulated the rule that "no foul is allowed on players without the ball in the last two minutes".
If O 'Neill could feel Yao Ming's free throw, his personal data and team performance would be very different.
So, O 'Neill will not overcome this weakness through intensive training? Reinforce this short board? Isn't he diligent?
This is really impossible, although O 'Neill said so: In my opinion, this is how God keeps me humble. Because I have far surpassed the people around me in other aspects, if I make another 90% free throw, I will definitely become arrogant. In order not to make me a complacent person, God said,' Hey, son, you are just an ordinary person. '
I understand his remarks as his self-mockery, which is an embarrassment that he can't solve even if he trains hard, and it is a gift.
Other players like him are Brother Alphabet, Lu Biao, Dream Green, Simmons and so on.
Of course, the letter brother and Simmons are still growing up, and it is still inconclusive. If they can improve their shooting, it will be even scarier.
Second, no need.
Everything is not satisfactory. In a perfect league like NBA, the role and position of each player in the team has been basically determined. Everyone can do their job to the maximum extent, which is the greatest help to the team.
For example, the pistons in the "Four Kings" period of the Lakers were destroyed.
In this system, "Big Ben" Wallace's duty is to defend and rebound, and the team basically doesn't need him to score.
Therefore, even if his free throw percentage is lower than O 'Neill's, only 465,438+0%, the coach still doesn't need to let him practice free throws and various scoring skills in training, but only needs to master more and more defensive and rebounding skills when he is familiar with it.
Billups is responsible for organizing and handling the key ball, Hamilton keeps running and shooting, "Little Prince" Prince and another Wallace Roaring Buddha master the balance of attack and defense.
In this way, the whole team operated like a sophisticated machine, and defeated the Lakers with the "Four Kings" without temper, thus winning the championship.
This shows that in the NBA, freshness is stronger than knowing everything. Therefore, there will be functional players such as Rodman, Mutombo and Tucker in active service, and they will firmly occupy a place in the team.
Of course, the current NBA competition increasingly requires players to develop in an all-round way, with both offensive and defensive abilities, and to switch freely from 1 position to 5 position. Even so, we need hard-working people and tired people, so professionalism and accuracy are suitable for the development of the team.
Sometimes the problem is not that simple. Some things are gifts, and it is difficult to change them simply by hard work. Some players are naturally good at shooting, such as Curry and his younger brother. They all have excellent shooting talents, which must be inseparable from his father's genes, and most players will not be as accurate as Curry even if you practice shooting three points hard.
Like Brother Alphabet and Simmons, they all have poor three-pointer ability. They will definitely strengthen their three-point shooting in private education, but their three-point shooting ability has not been greatly improved, especially Simmons, who missed none of them. It is really difficult for them to develop this skill. They need to work harder than most players to make a little progress.
They have all become NBA-level players, and their shooting ability is definitely N times stronger than that of ordinary people, but why can't they shoot correctly on the court? Because in the NBA professional arena, what you need is not general accuracy, and the muscle confrontation on the field is fierce. Players who are not confident about this kind of shooting are even more nervous. I believe they can definitely shoot when training.
Therefore, those players know their own shortcomings, but the lack of progress is mainly talent, and the training the day after tomorrow also accounts for a part.
For most NBA players, it is natural that they want to be stronger, but some players are not on the court, so why not "take money to muddle along". After all, the NBA is also a workplace. Players and employees alike, some people want to go to higher places, and naturally some people are content with the status quo.
And if you want to be strong, your efforts will succeed. The answer is obviously no, because talent determines the direction, and choice is more than everything.
Take Brother Xin's three points as an example. It's not that he doesn't work hard to strengthen it, but that the effect is not obvious. First, the three-point shooting rate is only 30.8%, only lower than the rookie period; Second, as an inside player, it is doomed that there will not be too many opportunities to float to the outside to shoot three points, and the average 3.9 shots per game is already a record high; Third, interior confrontation pays more attention to strength training, while the projection of three points requires soft touch, and it is inevitable that three points are not allowed.
Let's look at some inside players' free throws. Why are some poor and some good? Don't they practice hard at free throws, like O 'Neal and Jordan Jr. There must be, then why is it so bad? Because they choose to make themselves stronger and more extreme.
It's like when we are studying, it's inevitable that someone will be biased. At this time, most people will naturally choose to strengthen weak subjects. There are only three results. First, progress has been made in weak subjects, which is naturally a good thing, but it also means that you don't have much time to consolidate your superior subjects, even to the next level; Second, it is still difficult for the disadvantaged disciplines to make progress, but it also affects the dominant disciplines, paying attention to one thing and losing another; Third, give up weak subjects appropriately and spend more time on subjects with their own advantages to achieve the ultimate.
Gold is not enough, no one is perfect. Pursuing perfection is the universal desire of human beings, but God is fair. Gave direction from the beginning. As for the way to go, it's your choice. How far you can go, your efforts will give the answer.
Simply loving basketball is purely a personal opinion.
Welcome to comment, I am the god on the right hand side.
It can be said that every player who has just entered the NBA will have some shortcomings more or less. During their long career, they constantly strive to improve and improve their abilities. In fact, the topic is problematic. Most players in the NBA work hard. They train while playing and constantly strengthen themselves.
Lebron james is a superstar with comprehensive skills, but when he first entered the league, he was not perfect. He didn't shoot from a long distance and won't fight back. James didn't have the back-hitting skill at 20 10, so he couldn't back-hit barea with1.75m in the finals with Mavericks, which was ridiculed by many people. After years of training and promotion, James has almost no obvious shortcomings.
In addition to James, Harden, Russell, Brother Alphabet and other stars are slowly improving themselves. Some are fast, others are slow. Of course, talent is not necessarily compensated by training. For example, O 'Neill can't practice free throws anyway.
In fact, I can give an example from my life to answer the Lord's question. There are many students with partial subjects in the school. Don't they want to supplement and improve? This is irreparable by study. It's a gift. It's a question of learning or not.
Therefore, it is normal for professional players to have shortcomings. Some players can improve and even become conventional weapons through hard work, and some players cannot change through hard work. If everything can be achieved through hard work, can you reach the three-point level in Curry through hard work? Can you have Paul Nash's vision through hard work? The answer is no.
Just have a clear conscience. Many players in NBA try to change their shortcomings and give full play to their strengths. I think that's enough.
Even in the NBA, the strongest basketball league in the world, players have their own shortcomings, such as O 'Neill's free throw, Jordan's three points, and Brother Alphabet's shooting. It is said that no one is perfect. But these shortcomings do not limit them. Jordan is still the god of gods, and O 'Neill is still one of the greatest centers in NBA history. Brother Alphabet also took over James' mantle and became the "king" of NBA in the next decade.
O' Neill made a free throw 1992, and O' Neill was chosen as the top pick by the magic in the draft. In the first season, he conquered the NBA with his explosive performance and won the rookie of the year. His dominance on the court can easily "devour" every defender, but O 'Neill also has his own distress-free throws.
People even joke that O 'Neill is a big fat man who can do nothing but free throws. So how bad is O 'Neill's free throws? In the 2000 season, O 'Neill 1 1 made all free throws in the Lakers' game against the SuperSonics, setting a record of consecutive missed free throws in the NBA.
Despite this, O 'Neill scored 26 points 17 rebounds, 5 assists and 5 blocks in this game, and his dominance is still unparalleled. O 'Neill is obviously invincible if he can practice free throws well. Any tactics such as cutting "sharks" will become a cloud. The Lakers may also win more championships.
The same is true after strengthening.
O 'Neill's free throw posture is very strange. His palm didn't touch the basketball. He held the basketball in his finger, gave it a little push and flew near the basket, but he just didn't go in. At this time, of course, the happiest is the opponent, because their foul is worth it.
If the ability and consciousness of running and jumping are innate, then the free throw is undoubtedly the simplest and most unnatural, then isn't O 'Neill also practicing privately? ... of course I can practice! And it is quite accurate in training. But during the competition, it's still the same! Because the intensity of the game is far greater than the training.
Jordan's three-point Jordan's dominance in the NBA is beyond doubt. His performance in both offensive and defensive ends is perfect, 10 scoring champion, 10 best round and so on. Strong enough to be impeccable, if you have to find fault, it may be his three-pointer. Jordan's three-point shooting percentage is 32.7% (regular season) and 33% (playoffs). If we put Jordan's shooting percentage in today's NBA, it will be a bit out of reach. It can't be compared with Curry and Thompson's 40% three-point shooting rate (after all, the "Huashui" brothers all started with three points).
To tell the truth, today's NBA is more open, especially advocating offense, and it was swept away by the "five small deaths" of the Warriors. Almost all the teams began to imitate each other. In their view, this kind of play is simple and rude. Why not?
If we put today's "curry" in the Jordan era, do we really have to ask them if they can type it? After all, the NBA of that era, like the era of cold weapons, advocated confrontation more and paid attention to "boxing to meat." Unlike the current NBA, all players like to smash, and logoshot is highly praised by many players. Jordan once said, "If you put me in the current competition, I can score 70 points per game." . Although Jordan's words have exaggerated elements. However, it can be seen from this sentence that Jordan is disdainful of the intensity of NBA games today.
There is no need to strengthen.
It is conceivable that if Jordan had more 3-pointers in his career, his historical total score and various honors would have gone to by going up one flight of stairs.
Who is the biggest winner in this year's finals? Brother letter. If I remember correctly, this season is the fourth time that Brother Alphabet has played the playoffs. I finally got what I wanted. Look at Brother Alphabet's performance in the playoffs this year, and he deserves his star player status as Barker.
But to be honest, the bucks can win the championship this year. In addition to the letter brother, Middleton and Zhu are indispensable musketeers, especially Oledi, whose offensive and defensive skills are excellent. Without them, the champion of Alphabet, it is estimated that it will continue to drag on.
In fact, Brother Alphabet's performance in the playoffs is basically the same as before, especially the criticized projection ability is almost negligible.
His shooting ability seems to have not improved since he entered the league, especially his three-pointers His scoring method is still the prototype when he first entered the league, or relying on physical talent to press the inside. Or null connection and conversion.
You know, Brother Alphabet has been playing for nine seasons. The style of play is basically finalized. His three-point shooting rate is only 28.7%, which is difficult to match his superstar status.
Talent is too good, strengthen the shortcomings.
As we all know, to be a top superstar, shooting is an essential skill package. I can't be unaware of this letter. Won't he deliberately do intensive training? If so, why is the shooting effect so poor? I think it has something to do with his late contact with basketball. At first, he played by his body, and subconsciously he has developed the habit of playing. And like O 'Neill, his hands are too big. Just like adults playing children's basketball, it is not easy to throw. So talent is a double-edged sword. And your physical fitness is outstanding, and your projection ability will be relatively poor. Therefore, brother Xin, I don't want to strengthen the shortcomings, but my talent is too good to delay myself!
It is said that "no one is perfect without gold", and NBA players often do the same. There are no perfect players, even top players often have all kinds of "problems". For example, Wade can't shoot three-pointers, Harden's defense against no ball is pitted, O 'Neill's free throws are poor, and even James will be found out all kinds of problems.
Some players even have very serious shortcomings. For example, neither Simmons nor Brother Alphabet can make three-pointers, which is a headache. In this season's game, because Simmons didn't hit a three-pointer, the opponent directly chose to ignore it: giving you an unguarded shot means knowing that you can't shoot. Not only Simmons, Rondo in those days, but even Green, the dream catcher now, has been treated like this.
This is actually quite embarrassing. But the question is, why don't players choose to strengthen this obvious shortcoming? Even if Simmons has a 30% three-point shooting percentage in the game, it is impossible for the opponent to empty 5 meters, right? In Mr. He's view, there are several main reasons:
1. No talent. Why is the difference between people so big? The difference between people is really so big. How many players have made great efforts to enter the NBA, but few have succeeded. In fact, there are also three-point events like Simmons and McAway in training, and their shooting percentage is also quite good, but they dare not vote in the game.
If so, it is a terrible thing. Especially a player like Simmons, if he has obvious shortcomings, it will be very unfavorable for his future development.
2. Personal problems of players are of course rare. But because of laziness, lack of training, or other bad hobbies, many of them eventually faded out of the league from good players. Players like Saunders and Bynum should have a better future.
The urgency of a certain technology is not so high, which belongs to the privilege of some talented players. For example, Brother Alphabet, even if he can't make a three-pointer, can any team stop him? This season, the letter brother has turned into a big killer in the basket. Nearly 60% of the shots come from this area, and the shooting rate is nearly 80%. He can not only get the basket easily, but also score points. In contrast, his three-pointers are not so urgent. Of course, Brother Xin is old and his breakthrough efficiency is not so high, so he can practice three-pointers again. Just like James, he ran under the basket when he was young, but now he is old and plays healthy basketball at the right time.
Players spend so much time training that it is impossible to cover everything. Therefore, it is more meaningful to train some more important projects that are more in line with the team's tactics. I believe Simmons will continue to practice three points. After all, the importance of this skill has become increasingly prominent. If not, then he will never be a top player.
Many professional players have many obvious shortcomings. Why don't they strengthen them? In fact, it will not be strengthened. Many people are powerless, some have become accustomed to it, and some really don't want to change the status quo.
For example, Brother Alphabet and Simmons are both poor in three-pointers, which is related to their original style of play. Brother Alphabet has been playing inside, with outstanding advantages in jumping and height, so he wants to attack the basket as soon as he steps on the court, because it is easier for him to attack the basket than others. Because it was so easy to attack the basket, he didn't think about anything else. He was absorbed in how to dunk.
Simmons once said publicly that he didn't want to practice improving the three-point shooting rate and practice this technique hard. Why? He and Brother Alphabet have almost the same idea, and think that this offensive technique is enough for their own use. Besides, Simmons doesn't want to be a scorer. His ideal is to become "Magic" Johnson, playing guard wholeheartedly and organizing attacks, so it doesn't matter whether he throws three points or not.
What about Curry and Harden's defense? Curry can't do anything about it, and it is a habit. Because Curry has been exhausted, his task is to pass the ball to others or float outside to attack. When I first entered the league, I was still relatively thin, and my style of play has not changed, so defense has always been Curry's shortcoming. But with Curry's strong body, his defense is much stronger now and his confrontation has also improved.
Harden, indeed, was criticized by the outside world in the 14- 15 season, saying that his eyes were defensive and very negative. However, since joining the national team, Harden has changed. In the past two years, Harden's defense has been appreciated and praised by the coach. Harden's low post defense is tough and efficient now, but Harden's throwing defense is still slow. Maybe he likes the guard frame and rebounds with him. Harden moves slowly, and it will be fine if you get used to it. But now I can't say that Harden's defense is poor. He and Curry also changed, and Simmons made a three-pointer. I'm afraid this is the end of my life!