"Doing something and not doing something" means that some things should be done and some things should not be done, but in the process of writing, we must not stay at this level, otherwise our understanding will become superficial and we can only cite examples.
If you want to have profound ideas, you might as well ask more questions and why, and then guide us to think more deeply about problems, such as what to do and what not to do, and what are the reasons for doing and not doing? In other words, what are your criteria? For example, why did Tao Yuanming give up the career of "being extravagant and extravagant, riding on the pommel horse is light and dusty" and choose the farm life of "prosperous in the morning, filthy and filthy, and returning home with the moon lotus" without food to eat? It is not difficult to write this example of returning to the countryside away from the officialdom, but the key is to write the soul behind this behavior, that is, the lofty sentiments and indomitable spirit of the literati. Only by writing this inner thing can you say that your thinking is not bad.
Of course, from another perspective, it is not enough to judge whether these should be done or not. The key is how to do it. Because we are used to the confessions of some officials, we also know that it is easier said than done. In this case, we also need a mind that adheres to human virtues, benevolence, courtesy and wisdom, and single-mindedness. We also need to adhere to the integrity of the soul, and we will not waver and be confused between the suffering of interests and the choice of life and death, so as to achieve greater human beauty. The profound meaning of life is only the first step in writing a good article.
First, the subject of "you do something" should be the same object, and Zhang San's "you do something" and Li Si's "doing nothing" cannot be compared, because, as mentioned above, "doing something" is a method of personal cultivation and a means of personal self-improvement. If you write a comparison between two different people, it is obviously biased in understanding.
Second, the incident of "doing something and not doing something" must be implemented, and it cannot be ambiguous or vague. Tan sitong, for example, is also a person who does something. What is his "doing something"? Even on the day of the disaster, friends tried their best to persuade them, but they couldn't escape. This so-called "want more than the living"; What is his "promise"? It is the generosity that "political reforms in all countries are produced from bloodshed." Today, China has not shed blood because of political reform. The reason why this country is not prosperous is that it also exists. Please start from the beginning. "It's the generosity between heaven and earth, that is,' I laugh at heaven with a horizontal knife, and I leave two Kunlun mountains'!
Third, judging from the structural relationship of the text, "doing something and doing everything" may be a parallel relationship or a conditional relationship, "doing something and doing everything", but no matter what kind of relationship, it is best to point it out in the first natural paragraph of the article, so as to reflect the author's speculative nature, accurate examination and correct conception.