Zhang Bai’s career life: I agree with this point of view. The key to the question lies in the word "everything". If it is a clear technical issue, there will naturally be strict right and wrong.
But working in the workplace is not like simply answering questions in school. Most things do not have clear answers. Since there is no standard answer, there is no right or wrong answer that convinces everyone. Everyone has a different background
In the office, everyone comes from all over the world, and everyone has their own growth environment, living habits, and even different values. It is normal for everyone to have different views on the same thing. At the same time, different cultural backgrounds also lead to different cognitive levels of everyone, which naturally leads to different opinions.
For example, employees A and B have different philosophies and different work backgrounds. When building the same APP, employee A thinks that customers should be given more room for operation and configuration, and there is no need for a fool-like interface. Employee B also believes that simplicity and conciseness must be the main focus, and the operation interface should be made as simple as possible. So whose statement is correct? In fact, it is often difficult for us to judge. Everyone’s position is different
In the workplace, everyone plays a different role and has a different position, so their judgment on a certain matter will naturally not be the same.
In the process of developing the same product, those in charge of quality feel that more money and time should be spent on testing to ensure better quality; those in charge of market feel that more user surveys should be done to ensure that the product The target audience is more accurate; those doing research and development feel that they should spend more time and investment in the functional development of the product; those in charge of production feel that they should focus more on the stability of the product, which is more conducive to production. The person in charge of purchasing also feels that you should invest as little as possible to make the price lower.
In such a situation, can you tell which person’s statement is clearly wrong or correct? Obviously it is also difficult to judge. Everyone has different expectations
Everyone has different expectations for every task at work. Some people have high expectations and are willing to spend more time and energy to make things perfect. Some people think that the expectations do not need to be so high and should be about the same, as long as the customer can accept it. When encountering such a problem, it is difficult for us to say which one is correct.
Summary:
In the workplace, because usually we cannot work alone, but as a team of multiple people working together. Then, there are objective reasons for different backgrounds, different positions, and different expectations.
These reasons inevitably make it difficult for us to use a standard acceptable to everyone to strictly judge who is right and who is wrong when judging a certain job. What we can do is try our best to reach a consensus through negotiation and proactive communication, rather than having everyone admit that this is right or wrong. "Children only distinguish between right and wrong, adults only look at the pros and cons." The so-called workplace is actually a place where interests are exchanged. As long as the principles are not violated, there is no so-called right or wrong. The one who can obtain the greatest benefits is naturally the right choice. Therefore, if a person is too obsessed with right and wrong, he will never be able to make the right decision.
Bigfoot believes: If the water is too clear, there will be no fish, and if the people are too clear, there will be no friends. At work, there is no need to fight for everything. Most of the successful people in the workplace are There is a philosophy of fighting and not fighting. Their great advantage is that they understand the principle of giving and receiving, and can switch freely between fighting and not fighting.
From ancient times to the present, many famous quotes and classics have warned us to be tolerant and not care about the immediate gains and losses. To borrow a sentence from the Tao Te Ching, Wu Wei If you don’t fight, no one in the world can fight with you.
Of course, Lao Tzu is not asking us to give up everything, but telling us that we can become more powerful with a non-competitive attitude. To be invincible, in his opinion, only inaction can lead to omnipotence, just like what is often said in martial arts novels, there is a way to win without a move. If you don’t fight, you will fight. If you don’t fight, people in the world won’t fight with you. This also tells us that if you don’t fight, you may have less arguments.
In reality, in such a society with limited resources and very limited opportunities, competition is an inevitable phenomenon. What’s more, young people in the workplace have a very strong sense of competition and everything is based on competition. Means, competition as the purpose, only wanting to compete, only knowing how to compete, fear of failure, unable to be indifferent, how can we do nothing and do everything? Next, let’s talk about what you shouldn’t fight about in the workplace from four aspects. 1. Don’t argue with the leader about right or wrong.
Although direct communication has become a corporate culture respected by more and more companies, the direct method does not mean that the content is straightforward. When communicating with the boss, you do not need to be thorough or straightforward. You don’t even need to be emotional or rational, because the boss is not your freedom, nor is he your mentor. These truths are likely to become silly words in their eyes.
Most people who can walk with the strong are also outstanding. There are many benefits to not complaining in the workplace. You will not directly conflict with your boss, and you will not leave anything to say to others. But if it is really about important right and wrong, should we argue or not? There will be three results:
a. If your communication and coordination skills are very superior, you can not only retain the leader’s face, It can also guide things in the right direction, which is the best result.
b. The second best result is that the leader listens to you and the work is carried out normally. However, due to your ruthlessness, there is no guarantee that some leaders may not care about re-employing you.
c. That is the worst result. You have offended the leader and affected the normal progress of work. The most taboo thing in the workplace is not lack of talent and wisdom, but not knowing what the boss needs. , so whether you are a newbie in the workplace or an experienced driver, you must figure out what your boss is thinking.
2. Don’t be too smart with your colleagues. Every workplace person should remember this.
Don’t lose your rationality and grace when competing with your colleagues, and completely deny the other person’s situation. You must strive to be fair, reasonably evaluate the other person’s ability, and formulate a competition plan that suits you to ensure stability. To win. 3. Don’t compete with subordinates for credit.
If possible, be smarter than others, but don’t tell others that you are smarter than him. When a person reaches a certain height and position in the workplace, he must be superior, at least They are more qualified and more difficult than the employees under them. Many leaders gain momentum with their authority. It is common for them to take credit and push others aside. The credit is all due to their own command, and all the faults are due to the incompetence of their subordinates. .
This is over-emphasis on one's effectiveness as a leader. This kind of result is often counterproductive, and it is even less respected. It is easy to win a thousand troops but hard to find one general. An excellent leader is still scarce in today's position, if you already have your own small team, or are in the position of a person in charge.
Then you must learn to be courteous to the virtuous, and especially learn to take credit for the fault. On the surface, this seems to be a loss, and it makes you give up the part you should get, but. You seem to have suffered a loss, but in exchange you have received substantial surprises from your employees, and you have also gained the most valuable resource in the workplace, which is opportunity. It not only helps you and your company colleagues or subordinates to form a mentality of mutual trust, support and understanding. The environment also helps to form a mutual motivation and upward force.
4. Don’t compete with people of the same sex for their talent and appearance.
Wherever there are people, there are rivers and lakes, and where there are women, there are battlefields. How can women win beauty in the workplace? It really requires some skills. Where there are many women, there is no escape from a comparison. Words are more important than beauty, family background, and taste. If you are particularly strong in one thing, you must show weakness in other aspects accordingly. You can neutralize it. If you are strong in everything, you have to know how to restrain it. If you let your aura spread out and you remain cold for a long time, there will always be some people who can't stand it and hug together for warmth. When the time comes, you can resist everyone alone Attack, that would be difficult.
So how do you learn to hibernate among people of the same sex? Everyone can watch The Legend of Zhen Huan. In the workplace. In particular, women should not use their beauty and ostentation to gain attention. Just like Zhen Huan, even if they have talents, they have to restrain themselves and use them in a low-key manner. On the other hand, they should know how to be open-minded, so as to make good friends and expand their connections.
If the four ways of not fighting in the workplace allow us to have both sides, then the four ways of fighting allow us to establish a solid position in the workplace, because after all, the workplace is still a place of interests, and how can we not fight for everything? Non-fighting and fighting should be There is no conflict between them. Only by switching properly can we ensure smooth operation. Let us take a look at the differences between the four competitions?
Strive to work hard to achieve perfection in everything assigned by the leader, and continue to learn and encourage yourself. Strive for trust. As a person who makes people feel safe and is strong, the leader will trust you to complete things. Strive for effective time and improve work efficiency. Strive for reasonable interests.
Please note that it is a benefit within a reasonable range, rather than seeking to maximize benefits. Salary is only a part of the income from work. In addition to the benefit of salary, it also includes opportunities to learn and get along with leaders, and to demonstrate Your own opportunities, etc. Career is a journey of growth that everyone must go through. Growth is always much more important than success.
Fighting in the workplace is not about right or wrong, but only about interests. Those who compete for everything are either stupid or profitable.
Hello! This is a great question!
Answer: In the workplace, never do "everything must be right or wrong." This is absolutely correct. Answer from the following aspects
1. To your superiors in the workplace
In the workplace, superior leaders must have their own opinions and plans due to different perspectives or patterns at work. Although they are not perfect, the direction and trend are good. If they deny or insist on it because of a little detail, It must be a taboo to ask your superiors to change. Even if you do it for the company, he will be very disgusted
2. Colleagues of the same age
If you are not willing to help in terms of execution, For him, if you are positive and he is negative, if you are serious and he is perfunctory, you may blame his attitude and think he is at fault. No matter how well you help him, he will not thank you and may hate you in his heart because he If he doesn’t want to do it at all, it’s not that he can’t do it well, then it’s a thankless effort, and even if he’s right, it’s meaningless. If it’s the work he’s responsible for, he should cooperate with the work and do a good job of collaboration.
3. Colleagues with the same leadership level
You are responsible and responsible in everything, selfless, giving a lot, tolerant, popular, strong in communication skills, and enthusiastic about work, and he belongs to For people who are selfish, shirk responsibility, scheming, and stingy, when you encounter a problem, you may take the method you think is right, but he insists on doing it according to his own ideas. In the end, the problem is not solved, but becomes more complicated. Facts have proved that he is wrong. At this time, he will blame you for not persisting in the first place, unable to bear failure, and resenting you.
In cooperative work, do not think that you are right and denigrate others, or think that it is for the benefit of the company, in order to cater to superiors, regardless of other people's feelings, blindly argue about right and wrong in everything, and in the end If you are right, you will lose face; if you are wrong, you will lose your emotions. Everyone has a different way of doing things
"What you must not do in the workplace: you have to argue about right and wrong in everything." I very much agree with this In a word, not only in the workplace, but also in life and society, everything cannot be divided into right and wrong. Many things cannot be clearly distinguished between right and wrong. Especially in the workplace, people have different positions, different statuses, priorities, and choices, making it even more difficult to distinguish between right and wrong.
Black and white theories are not reliable in reality. Everyone has different ideas when dealing with problems, looks at problems from different angles, and has different rulers for measuring gains and losses. Again, these are all determined by your status, position and way of thinking. It is a common saying that people often say: "The butt determines the head."
Put the problem in the environment of the actual production. Leaders consider the problem from a strategic perspective and may make trade-offs in local interests, which may be for the development direction of the company; and some Department or grassroots employees may not have the leadership level, so they pay more attention to local interests and immediate interests, which is exactly the opposite of the leader's opinion. Who can tell right from wrong in this situation?
In the environment of daily work and workplace interaction, there will also be different problems. When the leader talks about East, in your values ??and world view, or objectively "West" is correct, but the leader just wants "East", and the result of arguing with reason is that you will be "put in small shoes" by the leader, and then the leader will continue Going all the way "east", can this be solved by "right" and "wrong"? Conclusion:
In the workplace, there are many subtle rules and many helpless choices, which cannot be distinguished and explained clearly by "right" and "wrong". Therefore, in the workplace, what is important is not right or wrong; as a workplace person with professional ethics, just stick to your own principles and bottom line. Sometimes, don’t fight for right and wrong in everything. There is no need. You may also get injured. The workplace is like a river and lake, do it and cherish it!
In the workplace, there is no absolute right or absolute wrong. Since there is no absolute right or wrong, why should we argue about right or wrong? Most things have two sides, with different positions and perspectives.
The simplest thing is that for the same job, some leaders value quantity while others value quality.
Which leader do you think is right and which one is wrong? There's no way to judge at all. Only children argue about right and wrong, but mature people will assess the situation.
Do you have to point out that the leader is wrong in front of everyone? Did you think you were the only one who heard it? No one else said anything, so why are you the only one who can't keep calm? Or a manifestation of maturity and immaturity.
There are indeed rights and wrongs in some objective facts, but in the workplace, some rights and wrongs cannot be "disputed", but can be "pointed out" in a relatively mild way, and even if they are insignificant, they should not be mentioned. Whatever.
Just like a small mistake like the leader saying the wrong person's name, it will be over after he has said it. It is harmless, so why be so persistent. The results of arguing about right and wrong are often unsatisfactory.
Even if your friend's judgment is correct, it will be very embarrassing if the person "fighting over right and wrong" is the leader.
The leader may have his own considerations, and since his subordinates are directly challenging his authority, it would be strange not to get angry.
So many times, the result of fighting over right and wrong is that either both parties will suffer, or oneself will be completely defeated, which is very unworthy.
To summarize: in the workplace, when it comes to being a good person and doing things, the four most important words are "it's rare to be confused". Don't be too strong for a while and argue about what is right or wrong. Only confusion is in line with our golden mean!
Career planner Elaine looks at the question dialectically. Each answer has a suitable situation.
1. For disagreements, try to seek common ground while reserving differences. There is no need to decide who is right or wrong. Especially for things ordered by your boss, you can express your own suggestions. If your boss does not adopt them, you should implement them according to your boss's opinions. If it doesn't work, seek changes.
2. In the face of major issues of right and wrong, we must fight for right and wrong. If you don't argue about right and wrong, you will suffer big losses one day.
People in the workplace have complex and diverse working environments, intrigues in personnel relations, frequent interest disputes, and hidden murderous motives everywhere.
"Everything should be right or wrong." This is a matter of attitude towards handling and dealing with things. This attitude is unacceptable and cannot be done frequently.
Attitudes and survival principles in the workplace:
1. Take everything lightly, look down upon it, and do not care about it. Don't be afraid of losses, don't be afraid of rumors. Who has no one to criticize behind his back? Who doesn’t talk behind someone’s back?
2. Adopt the "golden mean" approach, choose the middle in everything, and never go up to the top or go down to the bottom. Don't get carried away when you have achieved merit, and spare others when you gain power.
3. Many times, there is actually no right or wrong in many things. Even if there is, it is not important. For example, if someone says that you missed picking up your trousers just now, you don’t need to be angry. Even if someone else says they are wrong, you don’t need to be angry. You should pay attention to observe this person's current words and deeds, and also pay attention to this person to see what his intentions are.
4. Colleagues are too persistent about things and always argue about right and wrong. There is no winner and it will only hurt the harmony.
Many people who have been there will tell you that there is no right or wrong in the adult world, only pros and cons. Only children can talk about right and wrong, and can be more serious about fairness, because children have no other choice. , but adults are different. They have their own principles of life, which is to do things that are beneficial to themselves. Often the facts that everyone sees are also facts that are beneficial to them. When you understand this sentence, you are a mature adult.
In the workplace, "everything must be right or wrong" is itself a child's thinking and a manifestation of immature psychology. But not everyone can understand this thinking mode. They all need to gradually understand it as they grow up. It is worth mentioning that the sooner you understand it, the better.
But some losses must be suffered so that you can grow. Avoid big losses in the future. Recently, a new beauty born in the 1995s joined the company. She has never lost when it comes to speaking. She claims that so far, no one has been able to take advantage of her in speaking. As someone who has been in the workplace for several years, although this little beauty has not fallen down yet, it will be a matter of time before she suffers a loss.
On the surface, she is very talkative and no one can beat her. In fact, her heart is fragile and she can't stand losing. In the workplace, the so-called loss is a win, and what you think is a win is actually a loss. Behind this is actually a contest of interests. Especially in the workplace, verbal disputes are meaningless.
When you are in the workplace, you must think about your role. What do you want to get when you work in a company? What are your own beliefs?
Everything that involves right and wrong is based on principles, and from the perspective of the results and goals of doing things, the effect is more important than the principles.
To put it simply, people must focus on the focus in the workplace. Wherever this focus is placed, results will appear.
If you only discuss the short and long, right and wrong with your colleagues or partners, then you may be too obsessed with the way to walk on the road, but forget where you want to go.
When "right and wrong" must be separated, you must be serious. For example, can the red line of the financial system be stepped on? For example, can the production safety system be destroyed? This must be serious.
Generally speaking, when it comes to issues of right and wrong, you can actually get better results by letting go of your default position. How to do it? Simply put, it means stating the facts and explaining why it is better to do so, without commenting or criticizing others, and just be flexible within the rules.