Current location - Quotes Website - Famous sayings - The hero is involved. What does it mean for Ying Zheng to stand tall in the world?
The hero is involved. What does it mean for Ying Zheng to stand tall in the world?
It means: For some heroes who have made great contributions and want to retire, Ying Zheng feels that he can't even achieve these conditions and is not worthy to be king.

This sentence is a famous saying of Qin Shihuang Ying Zheng. It can be seen from this sentence that Qin Shihuang was kind to heroes, and most of them died well when he was alive.

In addition to forcing Lv Buwei to die, Li Si Yao Jia turned a blind eye to kill Han Fei, while Ying Zheng did not kill Wang Jian, Wang Ben, Wang Li, Zhang Han, Wu Meng, Montaigne, Li Xin, Li Si, Yao Jia, Liao Wei, Guo Zheng, Meng Yi, Feng Jie and Wang Wan. These first-generation elders of the Qin empire are all old and dead, and most of them are old and dead.

Extended data:

Other famous sayings of Qin Shihuang:

1, I am the first emperor. There are many descendants, and two or three are endless.

This sentence expresses the ideal of Qin Shihuang. It is the first time that a king can have such a big territory after he unified the six countries. He felt that his great achievements could go down in history forever, calling himself the first emperor, namely Qin Shihuang. He hoped that his descendants would continue to use their names, Qin Ershi and Qin Sanshi, and that they would look down on the world forever like him.

2. I heard that Taigu had a nickname, and there was a nickname in the Middle Ages. He died quietly. In this way, it is meaningless to discuss the father and the gentleman. From now on, except for the funeral ceremony. As for the second generation and the third generation, it has been circulated endlessly.

I heard that the ancient emperor had a title, but posthumous title didn't. In the Middle Ages, they had a title before their death and posthumous title after their death. And this posthumous title was not given for no reason, but was sealed according to what he did before his death. So it is not the son who evaluates the father, but the minister who evaluates the emperor? This way is not desirable, and I don't like it either. I want to abolish posthumous title, so that II and III will be handed down forever.