The difference between the two 1, the difference of narrative objects.
Being reasonable is being reasonable. Nowadays, the examination requirements are called citation method-citing authoritative quotes, allusions, fables and well-recognized theorem formulas of celebrities at home and abroad to prove the central argument.
Citation argument is an argument method that quotes famous sayings as arguments, analyzes problems and explains reasons by quoting classics. There are two ways to quote: one is to explicitly quote and explain who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is to implicitly quote, that is, not to explain who said the quoted words or their sources. The reference method is changeable and flexible.
2. Different effects
Simple truth argumentation lacks credibility because of the rigor of argumentation and the source of truth used, while citation argumentation is more convincing than simple truth argumentation by borrowing famous sayings and universal axioms.
Citation argument is a kind of "reasoning argument", also called "quotation", that is, citing famous sayings or opinions as arguments, citing classics to analyze problems and explain reasons. There are two ways to quote: one is to explicitly quote and explain who said the quoted words or their sources, and the other is to implicitly quote, that is, not to explain who said the quoted words or their sources. The reference method is changeable and flexible.
3. Different functions
Reasoning makes the argument authoritative and persuasive. Answer: The viewpoint of ... is demonstrated by rational argumentation, thus making the argument more general and convincing. Key argument.
The function of quoting arguments: it can enhance the persuasiveness or literary talent of the article, make the argument more powerful or attractive, and further explain the argument of the article.