The differences between Komism and Anarchism are as follows:

Anarchism pursues complete anarchy, absolute individual freedom, individual autonomy and private property rights. Its primary premise is that individuals in society must be completely rooted in a society of voluntary action, so they must be completely free from violence or the threat of violence.

Komism pursues the annexation of all countries similar to the "vassal regime" in the past and the elimination of the functions of governments. However, instead, it still needs a functional institution to maintain the stability of the public-owned society.

Anarchism denies the existence of authoritative entities and the existence of authoritative-oriented social order. But it is by no means a return to a chaotic social state, but a society that still exists in order. Therefore, this must be satisfied with three organizational logics:

1. In the natural state, a purely free exchange process can be guaranteed, and the distribution of ownership and property rights of petty bourgeoisie must be based on egalitarianism.

2. Production cooperation can be spontaneous under natural conditions. This cooperation mechanism itself can spontaneously form an organic network, thus coordinating the whole economic operation and realizing distribution.

3. Individuals in the society must be completely rooted in the society of voluntary action, so they must not be hindered by violence or the threat of violence at all. Therefore, the system of anarchy must rely on voluntary agreements (or contracts, regulations, etc.) between people as the only legitimate social organizational structure.